Loading ...This Was Skipped Over & It’s Too Important To Miss
On Wed. Kewl2 made the following post,
New Legal Memo Giving Trump Supporters Hope on Christmas Eve Here is the link to the original article. http://New Legal Memo Giving Trump Supporters Hope on Christmas Eve I believe being Christmas Eve. many missed the article and my comment which was the only one. I am repeating my comment below. The article presents a great, reasoned case for the mistakes made by the Supreme Court in rejecting the Texas case and why they would almost certainly have to take it if it was resubmitted by the President(who would have standing, representing the people) I suggest it would actually be the Acting Attorney General (as proxy for the President and the people)
The paragraph about re submission of the Texas case to the Supreme Court by the US instead of Texas, being brought by the President(or I would say the Atty General as proxy for the President) is why Trump told Barr to resign by Christmas or he would fire him. May also be why SCOTUS set the date for the PA case to Jan.22 two days after inauguration because they know the TX case is going to be resubmitted and they will be deciding before Jan. 20th on that one. In favor of Trump who will be sworn in on the 20th. The PA case will be moot by then.
However this is going to play out, it better be done in the light of day, or there will be hell to pay. Thanks for the sound info.
We will not know until … until we know. It still has some appearance of the show of Professional Wrestling, though possibly the faking is not faking of naive supporters but rather clever ruse meant to conceal from opponents what will be a successful strategy.
Yet when I see today’s http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/incompetent-weak-trump-blasts-supreme-court-not-standing-fraud/ attacking the Supreme Court I can’t help thinking, what’s this guy doing talking about it, potentially alienating a swing justice or two, rather than letting the person under Barr stealthily file? Sure, his comments could amount to pressure on justices, but I suspect that in their positions they would be more inclined to react passive aggressively by voting against him.
Not that I know. I of course see things as someone who disagrees with him but sees the election fraud as absolutely frightening and the idea of a set D-party victory in the current setting even worse.
Perhaps laying the groundwork for the removal of Roberts from SCOTUS via charges or resignation (in next week or so)??