Loading ...Cancer Rates : Vaxx Induced Explosion
Breast Cancer rates up 1200 Percent…Farmer Corrected…. 300%
——————————————————————————-
If you are a woman, know this. The New World Order hates you.
They especially hate your body and your ability to produce and feed children. In general, vaccine injuries among women are being seen at rates as high as 8 to 1 versus men in some categories of illness. That data was according to recent research produced by Naomi Wolf. But for breast cancer where such comparisons with men are difficult to make, the numbers are awful.
In the younger cohort of ladies under age 45 where cancer is typically relatively rare, the post vaccination numbers now showing up as reported by Cancer.Org for 2023 are up sharply from what has been seen in a series of prior years (from 2019 through 2021) where the mean was roughly 26,000 cases annually. The number for 2022 came in at 47,000 but for 2023 they are already reporting estimates of 48,780. The year 2023 is not over yet.
The correlation to the vaccination program should not be in doubt.
I have mentioned this before but will say it again. If you are a women you must take extra precautions in how you manage your health. That includes taking extreme care in the kinds of vanity products you use on your skin and hair. The NWO has made you their number one target in the program to reduce fertility and thus thin the human race. You may be at extreme risk using common makeups, skin creams, soaps, hair care, shampoos, facial products and perfumes as those products may be the vectors of attack even for ladies who are not vaccinated.
Doctor Betsy Eads explains the cancer data in an interview on Greg Hunters USAWatchdog.com
https://usawatchdog.com/cancer-is-exploding-because-of-cv19-vax-dr-betsy-eads/
…………
Editors Note :
Farmer has done great work to fact check this Doctor. Turns our she exagerated the issue …BUT it still is a BIG Issue
Brest cancer under 45 y/o
2021 26 k
2022 47 k
2023 47 k …extrapolates to over 100 k
so 300% increase …Not 1200%
……………
ALSO NOTE ANOTHER EXAMPLE
COLON CANCER MALES UNDER 45
2021 5 K
2022 10K
2023 1K….EXTRAPOLATES TO 20K
AGAIN 4X THE 2021 RATE ( 300%)
Listen people, these numbers are so severe that if they don’t let up there are not going to be many women a decade from now. Could this be why they are trying so hard to normalize gay sex, transsexuals, sex with children and other alternatives to ordinary relations between healthy men and women. I may be going out on a limb saying this but the main victims of the vaccinations program appear to be women. And since there is no way to turn off spike production and other changes to DNA caused as a result of the shots then the numbers of victims will be compounding as the next few years pass. Will it get so severe that women are in a social minority or face extincion? I don’t know but it looks really bad.
1200% ?
This is unfathomable. Difficult to beleive or accept . Not saying I dont beleive ..but it’s hard to wrap ones head around these numbers
I’m pulling this thread Fully. I went and got the data to check for myself. Doctor Eads was so confident that I never really questioned what she was saying. But it seems she is wrong on this data as you can see from the attached data pages.
Dont pull it Farmer
Good on you to fact check this
BUT it’s still NOT Good re brest cancer
stand by
Brest cancer under 45 y/o
2021 26 k
2022 47 k
2023 47 k …extrapolates to over 100 k
so 300% increase …Not 1200%
Lets put this on the main post
An excellent example of fact checking
OK thanks. Sorry about jumping in with bad numbers though. I need to be more careful. Doubt everyone should be the motto. The anti-vaxxers can propagandize as well as the pro-vaxxers. In this case it looks like Dr Eades transposed her numbers and used the annual total estimated for 2023 for all breast cancers for all ages. That makes for a huge error though. So let me apologize again for repeating it. As you say though, the 2023 totals thus far are still horrific as this is just halfway through the year.
Note: This posting has been edited June 27th to account for the differences in numbers provided by Betsy Eades versus the actual numbers she was quoting from on the Cancer.org site. The data is now published above for comparison.