TURNS OUT GRAPHENE IS A REAL THING
I admit I have been reluctant to embrace the graphene in the blood fear theory BUT…YIKES
again JC
Finally! I’ve been waiting FOREVER for someone to do a comparative blood study of jabbed versus unjabbed blood, and yesterday, the Epoch Times — which has been tearing the vaccines a new one lately — ran a story headlined, “Study Found ‘Foreign Metal-Like Objects’ in 94 Percent of Sample Group of Symptomatic People Who Took mRNA Vaccines: Italian Doctors.”
The sub-head explains, “Among a study sample of over 1,000 people who developed symptoms, researchers found ‘graphene-family super-structures’.”
The study published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research last month, and is titled “Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna.”
Out of 1,006 patients analyzed, researchers found only 58 had a normal blood profile. In other words, 95% of the thousand patients had abnormal blood following the injections. The researchers had access to pre-injection blood samples so were able to accurately compare the patients’ blood before/after.
This is a mild example of what they found in one of the 950 of cases:
Before Injection After Injection
The study explained the visible differences:
The right side image shows the same person’s blood one month after the first dose of Pfizer mRNA ‘vaccine’. Particles can be seen among the red blood cells which are strongly conglobated around the exogenous particles; the agglomeration is believed to reflect a reduction in zeta potential adversely affecting the normal colloidal distribution of erythrocytes as seen at the left. The red blood cells at the right are no longer spherical and are clumping as in coagulation and clotting.
In other words, in the “after” image, the patient’s blood cells look “sticky,” which is exactly what you don’t want. Blood cells should be smooth and easily slide off each other. Sticky blood leads to clumping which leads to clotting. Blood cells should also be nicely disc-shaped, but the “after” photo shows the blood cells assuming a variety of distorted shapes. Discs are designed to easily slide through veins and capillaries. When the cells are oddly and unevenly shaped, they can hook onto each other, blocking veins and capillaries.
There’s also a weird structure visible in the “after” picture. The researchers noted such abnormal structures were common in the samples. They found these aberrant structures in three main types: smooth “butterfly-like” structures, complex crystalline structures, and tubular structures. They also noted the presence of what appear to be graphene particles interacting with blood cells:
None of the structures or particulates were present in the patients’ “before” blood samples.
Here’s the study’s conclusion, which speaks for itself:
In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying hemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented. Such phenomena have never been seen before after any “vaccination” of the past.
In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow especially at the level of the capillaries. As far as we know, such self-aggregation phenomena have only been documented after the COVID-19 mRNA injections were first authorized, then mandated in some countries, and now are still being widely distributed in more than 12.3 billion doses (Bloomberg.com, 2022).
Further studies are needed to determine the precise nature and purposes of the foreign particles found in the blood drops of about 94% of the mRNA recipients we have studied. Where do they come from, and why are they in these injections?
I’d be remiss if I didn’t highlight the fact that the 1,006 study participants were all experiencing symptoms of vaccine injury, so these results aren’t evidence of what anyone is facing who took the injections and feels fine. But it’s very significant anyway, providing evidence of CAUSATION between the jabs and the variety of strange illnesses people are suddenly and unexpectedly experiencing after taking the shots.
In other words, Sudden Adult Death Syndrome might be a little less baffling now. This kind of study is easy to reproduce. If the researchers are wrong, they could be disproven in a few days. If only we had a giant, well-funded health bureaucracy that could follow up on something like this, dangit.
If I’m ever facing elective surgery, I will bank my blood. For emergencies, I just hope I won’t require a transfusion.
Will Pureblood have a premium? A simple test and possibly there will be a robust mkt for our blood.
$1000 per pint?
This is concerning. Geez!
Is this being addressed anywhere? Red Cross? Anybody?
It has been discussed in various forums that the injected particles/structures will form an electronic bridge to interact with & control brain/body functions and are lying dormant awaiting full 5G/6G activation. This technology has been reviewed publicly by both prominent scientists and WEF spokespersons but mass “real life” trials have not yet begun(perhaps because of the 30% that refuse the injections). The metallic / graphite interface will enable those with the proper technology to control how citizens think & act. Each injection has been shown to carry a unique “Bluetooth” identification by recipient so that AI control at the “individual” level can be effected.
This also explains the NEED for 100% compliance with the multiple vaccine programs (originally scheduled for completion by 2030 – (Covid jabs to run to 2025 as highlighted at the tent last year.)The speed of acceptance and general lack of pushback has moved the timetable forward. Still the non-participation rate in the gene modification jabs remains too high at 30% and so the restrictions etc. will continue until forced Val’s can be implemented (as per Australia military forced jabs completed last year on aboriginal settlements & subsequent mass deaths of elders – does anyone remember.)
It is quite unimaginable to realize that decades of social progress & rule of law accomplishments by the “developed world” have been destroyed in only 2 years.
30% ?
Maybe in the USA but in Africa it is 90%…what about them ?