Massive Johns Hopkins study: Lockdowns, masks, closures did NOT reduce death
Researchers at Johns Hopkins University conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of thousands of studies to determine whether or not there is empirical evidence to support the belief that “lockdowns” reduce COVID-19 mortality.
They concluded that such policies are “ill-founded” and should be “rejected.”
Curiouser and Curioser
John’s Hopkins was IN on the “Pandemic” ..They had their website ready …It was online immediately
Counting the cases and the deaths 24/7 365. They were Also in on Gates Dress Rehearsal in late 2019
Now they Publish a hit piece on all of the Measures that all failed to prevent any deaths ?
WTF ?
1…Are they doing this because the scam has essentially been revealed and documented in the Genocide Court Filing at the International Criminal Court. Not sure if this Court has any teeth but we shall see
2….Are they just being honest and doing important research ?
3….Have they Called of the great reset because of World Wide Populist Protests ?
4….Are they ready to sacrifice all the Health Czars and Dictators to install a new group
after this crop failed to deliver 100% Vaxxed ?
Anyhow…Lets pass this one around…it will open some eyes which are already starting to open…Open Wide !
The conclusions by the Johns Hopkins researchers are consistent with other studies of hard data from around the world showing the lockdowns and other severe mitigation measures didn’t stop the typical waxing and waning of a respiratory virus pandemic.
Brownstone is a Great Asset in this War for Freedom
FGC – agree with your observation – Hopkins has been in the forefront of everything related to this COVIC pandemic scam so this is a HUGE shift in strategy. WHY?? I do hope there are some with knowledgeable insight into such a shift. Note that Hopkins is NOT saying the mRNA’s didn’t work but instead have restricted their comments to lockdowns etc.
More than a year ago (when the WEF didn’t think anyone was listening) they indicated that this crisis would continue until 2025/26. It was to come in waves with the second biological weapon release speculated for Feb/2022.
The strategy involved increasing the pressure — then lay off a bit — then increase it even more — then lay off a bit — then increase again etc etc etc.
Perhaps all that we are witnessing is the “backing off” stage after COVID and immediately before the next bioweapon release. If they can get people to forget that the mRNA injections for COVID are experimental (full FDA Approval even though they aren’t using same) then a shift to an EBOLA/MARBAN type bioweapon would both A) finish off those with destroyed immune systems from the COVID toxic spike protein and B) enable a new mRNA injection to magically appear for the new bioweapon.
It’s a shift that would be immensely profitable while eliminating the first Billion or so souls for the depop program. It would also enable an opportunity to remove troublesome individuals that stood agains’t the COVID scam and assume complete control of the internet to shut down any discussions outside the approved narrative.
It certainly is curious to see Johns Hopkins negate the actions of the past 18 months in such an unsolicited and surprisingly strong wording.