MORE COVID TEST “CYCLE” OUTRAGE
This is a hot topic now.
This is vindication for everything we have discussed here for many months. The Scam / Scandal is just beginning to be recognized by a wider audience. For some this may be just like a boring science class in high school but this information is Vitally Important to get out to the general population in a format they can understand : Here is my attempt .
Leading Scientists Agree .
The Tests they use to detect Coronavirus Disease is far too sensitive . It needs to be ratcheted way down to have any meaningful results .
Up to 90% of what are called positive cases are not infected at the time of the test and not contagious in the least.
Simply Put : the Test that is the Center of all Covid Policy and therefore the most important test in the history of the world GROSSLY overstates “cases” It is a complete failure as it is currently structured.
Snip from the Article.
“A positive PCR test does not tell doctors whether the person is currently ill or will become ill in the future, whether they are infectious or will become infectious, whether they are recovered or recovering from COVID, or whether the PCR test identified a viral fragment from another coronavirus infection in the past. The CDC reports that a person who has recovered from COVID-19 may have low levels of virus in their bodies for up to three months after diagnosis and may test positive, even though they are not spreading COVID-19”
“It’s just kind of mind-blowing to me that people are not recording the CT values from all these tests—that they’re just returning a positive or a negative,” said Angela Rasmussen, PhD, a virologist at Columbia University in New York. “It would be useful information to know if somebody’s positive, whether they have a high viral load or a low viral load,” she added.”
Whole Article ”
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/09/coronavirus-cases-plummet-when-pcr-tests-are-adjusted/
You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”
— William Wilberforce
that NYT article from late Aug reported 90% of cases are false positives
so 10% (roughly) are real.
Of that 10% I wonder how many are symptomatic or not?
The WH outbreak shows that some positives have symptoms and need treatment.
I haven’t seen much on symptoms and treatment other than for Trump.
What I noted was that symptoms appeared Thur, tested positive late Thur, and worsened on Fri after admission to WR. That’s a fast timeline. He has a personal physician; we don’t.
That reinforces my belief that ordinary citizens need to have outpatient treatment options ready at home, before they become symptomatic. (And stay clear of beauties like Hope Hicks)
I’d also like to know if they know how she got it, and how he got it.
Do they know Case Zero for the WH outbreak? (And is he/she a democrat? LOL Was it KellyAnne’s husband, eg.)
Interesting article I saw that flu didn’t appear this past season in southern hemisphere, due to lockdowns. PERHAPS we get fewer false alarms from mild cold/flu season in the north. That has the potential to be very disruptive, given how poorly they are diagnosing covid at this point.