PATENTED GENOCIDE
DR. DAVID MARTIN YESTERDAY
Martin’s credibility is under attack…as per the piece Pedro posted earlier
That piece is still on the front page here ( if you haven’t followed the story…there are many comments…have a look )
https://goldtadise.com/?p=502401
pedro posted a link to Martin’s latest interview
I am highlighting it here for all to watch
Martin’s Thesis is very Damning to the Cretins.
Is he a Globalist gone Rogue or is he a controlled opposition plant working for the Cretins ( as the mystery author alleges)
You decide
Fully, I read the entire Google Doc article. Lots of info there. It is interesting that someone can be everywhere and involved so much in Globalist Agenda.
I am confused at this time.
All I can say for sure is what I can observe with my own eyes and hear from reliable sources.
The “Pandemic” was obviously something that caused many elderly to die or become ill. Spread through respiration. Was the Seasonal Flu overlapped, likely.
Do masks work, no. Lockdowns just prolong the event. Natural immunity is lasting with most viruses. A 99% recovery if you get Covid.
Was it released or planned to create the fear necessary for most of the world to accept a “vaccine” under EUA. I’m believing this scenario more and more. Not sure of course but sure looks like it due to the intense coercion to take the jab.
Somehow up to 80% of us slobs already had some level of immunity coming into the “Pandemic”.
People are dying and having adverse reactions to the jab, yes.
Ultimate goal is a ID Card for control like the CCP Social Credit system, yes definitely.
The Great Rest is another term for Communism.
Yes, we need to resist before the ID Card rollout or it will be so much more difficult to reverse the damage.
I have more trust in RFK jr or Reiner Fuellmich. Seem like the real thing. Martin???? I have no idea. A smooth talker.
He also names Del Bigtree as a Agent planted ( calls hi a Pro vaxxer)
That’s where this guy lost me !
Never trust anon authors . Put your name on your research or it’s suspect
Agree about Martin however…not sur about him…BUT this video does seem like the real deal
The changing narrative from Fauci was troubling. It is either true or it’s all BS and he can’t remember the same BS so he calls it “the science” . What a buffoon! I knew there was something wrong there.
My wife was not fooled from day one.
It is difficult to describe simply. At least I can’t do it well. I was too tired last night, and I just woke up now. I would like to offer up some guidelines I use for myself:
1. Tend to trust nothing and no one unless you have looked at it from multiple angles for quite some time.
2. Be prepared to wake up and consider yourself having been at least 99% wrong on anything and everything and be happy to have been educated.
3. Unreliable sources can be extremely useful. If, for example, Martin is put up there to confuse, the patents may indicate an ongoing project starting early on. Consider along with other data.
4. If (note that this is a conditional) there is a seriously efficient effort to deceive, there can be multiple agents or perspectives designed to confuse, distract, divide, and so forth. You might well have an obvious problem being exposed by another problem person or other entity, and months later a seemingly more sensible one still might be exposed as a plant. It might be rather like layers and layers of embedded spies in your ministry.
5. If in a world well controlled by not-so-nice entities, the most innocent and decent person even if not making many mistakes will necessarily be doing the work of entities with improper goals much of the time. Such a person might get improperly called out, and possibly maliciously. It is an old trick.
6. The world of law may be limited. Change the law and presto changeo it’s gone. We never honored the Nuremberg Code and if we did then we don’t now (racist, sexist, or something like that, created by white males). We have now updated the rules on what constitutes FDA (or other such agency) approval and backdated them. You can’t live back in the 20th century. All your arguments are obsolete. Lawyers are just lawyers. The Science is what is important. Etc. Also, as I’ve noted before, I’m not so keen on the strategy of sounding punitive, whether one is in a strong or weak position. Much better to go for public discussion, healing, trying to forgive make good in order to allow some forgiveness, make it so never happen again. Law ok as an adjunct at best, not to be relied on. Relying on a few key people questionable.
7. Don’t jump to conclusions. Smoke and mirrors. Stick to facts. Look for incongruities — what doesn’t make sense.
8. Fauci was suspicious for being a grifter way before Martin’s scenario of patents started. At least I had him on my do-not-trust-in-the-slightest scenario when looking into HIV in the scientific literature somewhat casually as AIDS emerged. I do not doubt that he knows a lot about Covidiana and if were to speak straight (possibly impossible for him) he would be able to give extremely useful information, but it is both ludicrous and scary the way he is put on a pedestal as a demi-god as the world’s greatest expert, a wise and good man, etc etc, and millions venerate him. Important to consider how that happened. Are there people you/we venerate wrongly? If so, how did that happen? Are you and I compromised in ways you don’t know?
10. In summary, I am an advocate for not being complacent. I do not go for idols and Leaders, but conversely I think one can learn from even the worst sources as they let things slip out.
These are some early morning before coffee thoughts not well edited. Apologies that disjointed. Have a pleasant day.
I don’t believe it. No, I do not. No way.
Martin is saying the few, for money and for power, have unleashed a transcendent evil upon the many.
It is a story too horrid to believe. I cannot believe it. Can you?
Yes I can believe it
Evil personified