Loading ...The hidden COVID vaccine scandal nobody wants to talk about
REPOST
JON RAPPAPORT EXPLAINS THE SHAM VACCINE “TRIALS” IN CLEAR EASY ENGLISH. CHECK IT OUT…IT’S AMAZING …AMAZING !
Not much hs been made of this even in the ALT media
Bottom line these things were Authorized by the Government Medical Stooges based in 150 mild cases out of a hundred thousand people in the trials . SCAM is not the right word here .
If Jon’s simple explanation becomes more widely recognized it will take down the WHOLE VACCINE INDUSTRY ….so Pass it on..get it out there in the zeitgeist …sheesh
Paywalled…so I copied it in a comment
it is pay walled
You’d think the alternative journalists would have caught on. But no.
It’s almost as if they studiously ignored the evidence staring them in the face.
Why?
I don’t know. Maybe they only pay attention to proof when it comes from their specially approved “alternative sources.” Or maybe they’re just too stupid to notice the truth.
Or maybe the truth is so devastatingly obvious, they can’t believe it’s so simple. They can’t believe the absolute refutation of the vaccine is right there, out in the open, for anyone to see.
This proof first appeared in an op-ed in the New York Times. I dug into the evidence there and expanded on it. I went to the bottom of that rabbit hole.
You see, when the clinical trials of a vaccine are DESIGNED to prove nothing important; when those trials are looking for evidence showing the vaccine can prevent NOTHING ANYONE CARES ABOUT; and you see that, and you see WHY they’re doing this exceptionally stupid thing, you’ve GOT THEM.
You’ve got them once and for all.
No matter what they do after that, they lose.
They can’t reverse course and win.
They’re stuck.
What they gained by the official authorizations and approvals for the vaccine doesn’t matter. Their ads and public service announcements and wall to wall messaging and all the bloviations about the vaccine protecting against this and that—you can sweep all that off the table.
Note: When you design something to fail, at best you’re going to succeed in proving failure. That should be clear to anyone. I hope so.
Here we go:
PART ONE
Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials.
They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.
September 22, 2020, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know” (click here):
“If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?”
“The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”
“But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”
“According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”
BOOM. THE CLINICAL TRIALS WERE NOT DESIGNED TO SHOW THE VACCINE COULD PREVENT SERIOUS ILLNESS. OR HOSPITALIZATION. OR DEATH.
The Times: “To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”
BOOM.
This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.
And I could stop this article right here and walk away. Done. Finished. Nothing more need be said.
And you the reader could walk away. OK, done. The clinical trials of the vaccine were never intended to prevent serious illness of any kind. Never intended to prevent hospitalizations or deaths. End of story.
Goodbye. Forget the vaccine. Why would anyone want to take it?
But if you want to know WHY the clinical trials were designed this way, and HOW the con was played, and why it was actually necessary to design the clinical trials to be useless, read on.
First of all, make sure you understand the clinical trials of the RNA vaccines were only designed to show effectiveness in preventing “mild cases of COVID,” which nobody should care about, because mild cases (cough, fever, chills) naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.
Now let’s go deeper. Read the next section from the Times piece, and then I’ll make comments.
“The Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each; Pfizer’s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19…”
Now pay close attention. Here’s how it works. The vaccine companies are looking for a total of 150 mild COVID cases to occur, combined, in the two groups—those receiving the placebo and those receiving the vaccine. How would that happen? The researchers believe “the coronavirus is spreading everywhere” and it will pounce on some of the volunteers during the clinical trial.
Let’s say that, during the trial, 100 people receiving the placebo develop mild COVID-19 (cough, chills, fever), and only 50 people receiving the vaccine develop mild COVID.
The vaccine companies would say, “We just proved the vaccine is 50% effective in preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to do, in order to win emergency authorization from the FDA. Release the vaccine. Inject the world.”
The outcomes for ONLY 150 people equal “let’s shoot up seven billion people.”
That’s staggering.
The magic number of 150 COVID cases? How is a COVID case defined? The authors of the Times piece have the answer:
“In the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19—for instance, a cough plus a positive lab test—would qualify and muddy the results. AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.”
A cough and fever (“mild COVID”) are nothing to worry about, and don’t require a vaccine at all. We’re talking about 150 cases of “who cares.” That’s what the COVID vaccine is DESIGNED to prevent.
“So, Doctor, the magic number is 150 ‘who cares’ mild cases? That’s the number that will decide the immediate fate of the planet?”
“Of course.”
“And these 150 people, who you say develop mild COVID-19…no one should care, because those symptoms cure themselves, and no vaccine is needed.”
“Correct.”
“And come to think of it, the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from mild COVID-19, as a result of the effects of the vaccine.”
“Yes, that’s right.”
“But you’re very confident in the success of the vaccine.”
“Indeed.”
“Why?”
“I have to be confident. If we’re exposed as incompetent frauds, our bottom line will take a huge hit. And we’ll wind up in prison.”
PART TWO: THE DEVIOUS TRICK
Now I’m going to go over the vital information again, but this time I’m going to show you how…
The vaccine companies can use the fatal flaw in their protocol design to…
Actually win approval of their COVID vaccine.
Stick with me. This is big.
Only 150 people are needed to make the major clinical trials of a COVID vaccine look like a success.
Out of 30,000 volunteers in a trial, researchers are waiting for 150 people to “come down with COVID-19.” MILD cases. They assume this will happen because they believe the coronavirus (which doesn’t exist) is everywhere, and it’ll infect some of their volunteers.
The researchers are waiting for a total of 150 people to “catch a mild case of COVID.” When that number is reached, everything stops.
Now comes the big moment. How many of those 150 COVID cases occurred in the group that received the vaccine, and how many in the group that received the placebo shot of salt water?
Let’s say only 50 COVID cases occurred in the vaccine group, and 100 in the placebo group. The researchers pop champagne corks. They say, “Look, the vaccine is 50% effective at preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to win emergency authorization from the FDA.”
BUT suppose 75 cases occurred in the vaccine group and 75 in the placebo group? No good. No good at all. No way to call the vaccine effective.
Now comes the “reshaping of the data.”
HERE WE GO.
The researchers say, “Wait. Thirty of the COVID cases in the vaccine group were REALLY just adverse reactions to the vaccine. They weren’t cases of COVID. You see, the vaccine can cause symptoms that are indistinguishable from mild COVID. Cough, fever, chills. ACTUALLY, there were only 30 cases of COVID in the vaccine group. There were 75 in the placebo group. That’s good enough. The vaccine IS effective. We’re golden. We can get emergency authorization from the FDA right now to shoot up everybody.”
Vaccine manufacturers HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG that they could pull this trick.
Why leave things to chance?
Why risk a few hundred billion dollars of profit on a random distribution of mild COVID cases among the volunteers in their clinical trials?
The definition of a mild COVID case is EXACTLY what the vaccine manufacturers needed. It enabled them to hatch a plan, to make sure they didn’t fail.
They could pawn off a MILD case of COVID as a reaction to the vaccine. They could fake that without causing ripples. The FDA would say, “The vaccine reactions aren’t serious. All right, no problem. We’ll approve this vaccine for emergency use.”
However…If the manufacturers designed their clinical trial protocol to prevent serious cases of COVID—very serious life threatening pneumonia—then first of all, they would be waiting to see 150 cases of really sick people to occur among the volunteers.
That might never happen. In 100 years.
Did you read that? THAT MIGHT NOT HAPPEN. IN 100 YEARS.
THAT’S WHY THEY HAD TO DESIGN THE CLINICAL TRIAL PROTOCOL TO IDENTIFY MILD CASES—COUGH, CHILLS, FEVER.
But if it did happen, and 150 volunteers came down with serious pneumonia; and the manufacturers had to pull their devious switcheroo trick and blame the vaccine for some of these SERIOUS cases…
They would have to tell the FDA that their vaccine was causing life-threatening pneumonia; and the FDA, under a lot of scrutiny these days, would find it very difficult to overlook that.
FDA: “We can’t approve this vaccine. It could cause a few million cases of dire pneumonia…”
The vaccine companies didn’t make a titanic stupid mistake in their protocol design. In gearing the protocol to prevent MILD COVID cases, they did what they did on purpose. It allows them to “reshape their data” and win FDA emergency approval for their vaccine. And it allows them to actually see 150 volunteers get sick—with very mild symptoms—as opposed to waiting 200 years for 150 people to get really sick.
There you have it. You see why the companies designed their absurd clinical trials the way they did:
ONE: If they waited for 150 volunteers to get really sick with dire pneumonias, that might never happen and the clinical trial would never end.
TWO: Designing the clinical trials to wait for 150 people to get mild COVID symptoms (cough, chills, fever) allows for the switcheroo, if too many of those mildly ill people were in the group that got the vaccine. “Oh, most of those people were just having mild adverse reactions to the vaccine. They didn’t have COVID.”
These companies have no intention of failing, starting over, and spending a year recruiting 30,000 new volunteers for another clinical trial. They want success and money now. They want to win the race.
And they will win, if the truth isn’t known and shared widely.
The punchline:
Every “expert,” in August 2021, is instructed to say the vaccine is definitely protecting people against severe illness and hospitalization. This is their promotional message to the world.
“Yes, even if you’re vaccinated, you could become infected with the virus, you could develop COVID, and you could pass the virus to other people, BUT you must take the shot. It will protect you from becoming severely ill.”
As you can see from what I’ve written above, this is a straight-out lie.
It was always a fantastic lie, from the beginning of COVID vaccine development, because the design of the clinical trials had nothing to do with preventing serious illness.
—end of article—
OK, we’re back in the present now; 2023. Everything you’ve just read has been studiously ignored. Shoved to the side.
The vaccine was only designed, at best, to prevent mild cough, fever, chills. That’s it. A mild case of flu-like illness. Which cures itself.
That design was intentional. It allowed the vaccine makers to win approval for the injection.
If they had to wait around for 150 volunteers in the clinical trials to develop serious pneumonia, that could have taken years. Or forever.
The clinical trials proved nothing.
The vaccine, even in mainstream scientific terms, was worthless.
It was designed that way.
That’s a chunk of blockbuster news anybody with a half a brain should be shouting from the rooftops. Instead: SILENCE.
Why?
Because this blockbuster news burns the whole house down.
It takes down the whole vaccine establishment. With a scandal for the ages.
And there are lots of vaccine critics who DON’T WANT TO GO ALL THE WAY.
EVEN THOUGH THEY SHOULD.
They back away.
They could shoot down, overnight, the whole basis for these COVID shots, and they would expose the vaccine that is maiming and killing of millions upon millions of people.
But they stay silent.
Show them this information.
Get them to tell you what their problem is.
— Jon Rappoport