The novel coronavirus’ spike protein plays additional key role in illness

“LA JOLLA—Scientists have known for a while that SARS-CoV-2’s distinctive “spike” proteins help the virus infect its host by latching on to healthy cells. Now, a major new study shows that the virus spike proteins (which behave very differently than those safely encoded by vaccines) also play a key role in the disease itself.”


“In the new study, the researchers created a “pseudovirus” that was surrounded by SARS-CoV-2 classic crown of spike proteins, but did not contain any actual virus. Exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage to the lungs and arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease.”

What did they say about the spike proteins in the vaccines?  “which behave very differently than those safely encoded by vaccines”.

The “vaccines” are nothing but the creation of spike proteins.  But they’re “safely encoded”.  And they know that it’s safe because why?  Two months of “testing”?

Why would anyone assume the “vaccine’s” version of the spike protein is not dangerous or even less dangerous?

And they’re giving this to kids for whom Covid isn’t even a health threat?  There are absolutely no benefits from this “vaccine” for children so there are no benefits to “outweigh” the risks.  It’s ALL risk for children.

As for adults, you ought to know that the “benefit” of the Covid vaccines is a trivial difference of about 1%.  In other words, as far as getting covid or not getting it, the difference between an unvaccinated person and a vaccinated one is a one-percent difference in the likelyhood of becoming infected.  That is essentially nothing.

This is actually from the vaccine manufacturers own testing results.  Why have you heard amazing numbers like 95% or even 60-something percent?  Here’s a quote from the Lancet that I found out about from Del Bigtree’s last Highwire show:

Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 90% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines. However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.

If you understand how useless the “vaccines” are and also understand how easily they could be dangerous because they fill you with spike proteins then you are truly informed and can now give a truly informed consent –or not.

There is nothing but risk to this thing.  Nothing.

And incidentally, the blood clots and most other side effects being reported are the sorts of vascular problems that these “safely encoded” spike proteins aren’t  supposed to be causing.  Thanks to all those guinea pigs who took this experimental vaccine we now know the experiment was a colossal failure.  Don’t add yourself to the disaster.