Short and Sweet and to the point

We asked this question early on at Goldtent .
Why are “they” NOT requiring an antibody test 14 days after the second shot.
To Prove The “Shot” works and produces antibodies to the spike protein.
This would remove all doubt …would it not ?
Apparently it is very easy to devise a test for spike protein antibodies…why not ?
Why just assume ? Why even consider a vaxxport if there is No proof a person has
antibodies ?
And Now all of a sudden antibodies following natural virus exposure do not count for anything .


Tell you what…I’ll take the shots when I see proof of antibodies to the spike protein. Why were the trials not designed this way. They used “symptoms” in their trials as the final arbitror of efficacy…Symptoms could be from the common cold.

Bullshit of the highest order