Loading ...WHO IS WHITNEY WEBB AND WHY IS SHE ALWAYS SO APOCALYPTICALLY NEGATIVE
The above is my own Search Query
Here’s an article that seems well researched
Whitney Webb’s Scandelous Deep Fake Journalism
Here is an article …Who is Whitney Webb ?
Couple of Notes
…Not exactly forthcoming about her family
…she’s only 33 and has lived in Peru and now Chile since 2014 when she was 23
………..
In summary : I don’t think she can be taken seriously given her age and history and the lake of any evidence at all of her central thesis regarding J Edgar Hoover and his aledged sordid compromised life.
That is her central thesis and if you take the time to read the above article ( it’s long and somewhat tedious ) you will very likely come to the same conclusion.
So do I believe her recent take on JD Vance ? Nope…I believe she is a compromised shill .
First, you pose a legitimate query towards skepticism.
No, I have not fact checked her. Interesting that she invited it.
The author’s key point
In other words, we can agree with what Whitney Webb is saying: Yes, our core institutions have been corrupted. But — and this is The Big Question — did it happen “in the type of way” the 33-year-old author is telling us? Namely, by a “sordid union” in the 20th century of Intelligence and Organized Crime originally forged by J. Edgar Hoover and the Mafia? And isn’t there something missing from Webb’s 20th century — like, um, uh, the sordid union of the KGB, cultural Marxists, things like that?
Agree with that retort. WW may have one narrow angle on it (at a time). She’s not the NSA and has books to write (make that one book at a time) based around what’s not well known.
Her strength seems to be linking this person to that person in a million directions at once, weaving an intricate web. Ie, she’s on to the PEOPLE who are behind all the mischief. Most of whom we know nothing about. Some sort of nebulous Cabal with a million tentacles. All trying to push their own agendas. Hell, that’s human nature.
Whatever the truth …. the MSM is not covering it.
Perhaps if we had a dozen WW’s circling the globe, with ample resources, they could fight it out and come up with the real story. A complete one.
For now, I don’t really TRUST any politician. Not all the way.
They have to make deals. They are NOT dictators, so they MUST have allies, and in this world, they HAVE to be bought (somehow).
So Trump saw JD as Tucker did, the least odorous Swamp Creature from DC he could find. Who actually is close to his wife.
JD got there with help. Peter Thiel and others.
Trump probably realizes that, in detail.
Hopefully, next winter we find out where that leads us.
Its not like we have a choice. OR, a realistic alternative.
“I’m the best you can get
Have you guessed me yet?
I’m the slime … “
if you read this article you cannot dismiss that her whole thesis that J Edgar Hoover was a Cross Dressing pervert Homosexual who was compromised and controlled is based on the testimony of one woman who alledged all this .
This woman was convicted 3 times as a serial lier and perjurer. She had a motive as Hoover was an associate of her Estranged husband and she included the husband in her alegations.
Sounds like a 20th Century Stormy Daniels / Michael Cohen Character
Webb cites photos BUT There has never surfaced any photos proving this alegation .
It’s all been debunked several times in several books and essays .
So …if that is true…then how can anything she writes or says be trusted.
AND she started her career from he home in Chile when she was 23 years old …WTF ?
I’m not familiar with what she’s written in that particular book.
And that topic is not one that I’ve encountered in any recent interviews with her that I’ve seen.
The vid I posted has her connecting JD to Thiel, Thiel to Palantir, and Palantir to The Surveillance State. That seemed topical.
In the past, her vids were about Jeffrey and his blackmailed control of big wigs, and possible ties to Mossad. Nothing I’ve seen since have rebutted that assessment, but not a whole lot more has been revealed either. Funny that.
PS — I don’t see/notice/detect video breaks in the interviews she does. She rarely pauses to retrieve names from her memory. In that, she has a SCARY capacity to remember (memorize?) details like the most dangerous attorneys seem to have. Her offloads are breathless in detail, yet impromptu. Like I said, scary.
Of course, I have no right to tell you who or what to believe or doubt, but I’m fascinated by your continued obvious dislike of Whitney Webb, something you’ve made clear here earlier. And I’ve made clear my views that I like her and find what she presents as being in the realm of the best and most comprehensive information about the present state of affairs in Western society available today. I find her to be anything but a shill; rather, I think she’s a whiz kid.
Why is this particular detail she claims about J Edgar Hoover of such great importance to you? Personally, I really don’t care whether or not Hoover was a homosexual, or whether that was where the present reality of compromised and owned influential persons in power actually got its start. These details make no difference as to the present reality that things have progressed to an absolutely crazy state of attempted control of everything, by whatever means, no matter what the actual starting details.
The woman who did the hit piece might have valid points about Whitney Webb’s inaccurate reporting of facts, but it appears she might also just be jealous of a 33-year-old who gets so much attention. Whitney Webb responded to the attack with a video, but I admit to having watched only the first few minutes, mostly because I don’t care who is correct in these details, probably because it is never going to be proven one way or the other. Here’s a link to the video: https://x.com/_whitneywebb/status/1621505854209146882?lang=en
Who is Diana West (Watson?) anyway? Why might you believe what she says is the be all/end all, anymore than Whitney Webb is? Check out a hit piece on her and her book a while back, which isn’t necessarily any more valid than her smear of Whitney Webb: https://www.nationalreview.com/2013/10/diana-west-still-wrong-conrad-black/
As to you question, “WHY IS (Whitney Webb) ALWAYS SO APOCALYPTICALLY NEGATIVE”, I’ve already addressed that in a response to an earlier ‘apocalyptically negative’ post you made about Whitney Webb then. In what I wrote about your negative post, there’s a link to what she recommends for everyone, something which is purely positive but requires each individual to take full responsibility for their own lives. This goes against the grain in a world where people love to blame others for what they themselves experience and take no responsibility for. You can find -and might even want to follow- what she encourages in that video, found in a link at this link: https://goldtadise.com/?p=604701
Cheers, brother!
Hi GB
That Book She wrote Focusing on Hoover is her signature piece of work that put her on the map
So her claim that he was a homo and compromised is the central thesis to most of her work
Not to say all her research is bunk …BUT if she cheated on her overall premise then I don’t trust her
looked up the author of the “hit ” piece she is described as a conservative historian ….as well as the person owning the website this was posted on
They seem legit as does the work presented IMHO
My current take is WW is a stroy teller…brilliant yes…but factual …sometimes yes and sometimes no it appears
ALL of her work implies we have NO HOPE to defeat the Evil ..it’s ALL evil …all of the players are controlled by the Borg and thats that
There are NO GOOD GUYS ONLY BAD GUYS in any positon of “Power”
Thats Bullshit
There’s Good Guys and Bad Guys in every corner of our societies
If One believes all her work to be true based on impecable research one would turn off the tent and go live life awaiting the apocalypse
So what are you waiting for ?
PS…I find her delivery …with a smugness and always a with smile while she delivers the villest profiles of Everyone she zeros in on … CREEPY
She is Brilliant ( maybe a savant) but if she has ever been disingenous about Poor old dead J Edgar …
Maybe he was a Heterosexual after all …..Then who can trust any of her work
We cannot forget the eyeball theory
Posting dirt about a Guy like Vance Right after he is selected and becomes famous …is an eyeball trap 🙂
I am going to start the J Edgar Hoover Strait Appreciation Society…will you be the first member to join ?
Will I join your J Edgar Hoover Strait Appreciation Society?! Fuck, no! One excuse is I’m too busy with so much other more worthwhile stuff. For example, I was just down swimming in the river, enjoying the scenery while cooling off. Bend is a wonderful theme park (if you’re not homeless), with literally thousands of people floating down the river daily during the summer months. The river show includes many shapely bodies that are infinitely more worth my time appreciating than dwelling on your dead homo buddy, J. Edgar. Just sayin’.
Now, what were we discussing… Oh, yeah, your strange fixation on what you don’t like about what you imagine about what somebody you never heard of before wrote about one insignificant part of a book you never read that Whitney Webb authored. At least, I’m presuming you didn’t read it, because you’re not big on long-form obscure stuff like that (neither am I; I didn’t read it either and don’t plan to, because I don’t care about it). Yet, for some unknown reason, what this West woman wrote about the book has you up in arms and making crazy claims, like “It’s Whitney Webb’s central thesis to most of her work.” Really? Says who?! That’s a wild claim. Just because you think that, doesn’t make it so. It’s certainly not central in my mind. Jeffrey Epstein was a creep, whether he got his start because of J Edgar or not.
Because you persist in being so negative on Whitney Webb, including now on the recently posted interview of her on Redacted (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyTr3_mhGPI), I just listened to it again to try to determine exactly what rubbed you the wrong way. I can’t figure out what you didn’t like about it, except that it was not exactly a glowing report on JD Vance. But she didn’t say he was “bad”. Instead, she pointed out where his funding comes from and basically encouraged the time-proven method of ‘following the money’ in order to attempt to understand potential influences. It puzzles me that you came out so strongly against what I view as a very informative interview, one that essentially advises caution.
Please, do let us all know exactly what you take issue with about JD Vance that Whitney Webb said in this interview. Please also explain why you believe “she is a compromised shill” and maybe we will agree with you. Without this, my guess is the shilling emanates from elsewhere, even if unintentionally.
Furthermore, because you did not respond to either the video I posted in December or to it when re-posted in my earlier comment today. Here’s the link, yet again: https://youtu.be/uVUZZ5xSR5w?t=3525 Am I to understand that you still haven’t bothered to listen to the encouraging words at the end of the video that come straight from Whitney Webb, words that refute your BS claim, SHE IS ALWAYS SO APOCALYPTICALLY NEGATIVE?
Here, to make it easy, I’ll write out for you what was said in the last 3+ minutes of the interview, which is at the opposite end of the spectrum from your claim, “ALL of her work implies we have NO HOPE to defeat the Evil”:
INTERVIEWER NATALIE BRUNELL Well, one thing that you’ve said is, No one is going to come save you. We have to save ourselves. We have to build locally and take the steps to be as sovereign as we can. Buy Bitcoin as part of that. I’m so sad that we’re out of time, but Whitney, any final thoughts? What do you want to leave the viewers and listeners with?
WHITNEY WEBB Well, I guess sort of what we started, right? So, some people hear this stuff and get black-pilled and worried. But instead, let’s get excited and go out and build some stuff, so we don’t have to use these crazy people’s tools and we can just use our own tools. You know, much better tools that actually work for the people and are made by people, for people. You know, not made by oligarchs, to force people to serve the oligarchs. You know, let’s not do that. Like, let’s get excited about building something new and better, instead of being all black-pilled and depressed. We can do stuff without it. We just have to like get out of the armchair and like start building. And that’s like what humans are meant to do, get out and do and build stuff. We’re not meant to sit, you know, on our couch, with a VR headset on, and just like be like that all day. Like, no, we’re supposed to get up and build stuff and make things and create. That’s what humans are supposed to do. So, like instead of being cognitively diminished by the Kissinger-Schmidt AI, and sitting there with your Oculus Facebook headset on, let’s get out and build real stuff and real tools, and like, you know, use Bitcoin for financial freedom like it’s supposed to be, and all this other technology doesn’t have to be bad. But we have to get out and build it ourselves. And there’s people that can do that. And there’s people in the space that can be supported to do that, if you don’t know how to do that. So, let’s go!
FGC- Whitney Webb is just providing information that she digs up, not selling anything. Just because you happen to dislike that she’s only 33 and you want her to look different and to speak only pleasant things about the people you support today, get over it! Admit you’re just black-pilling yourself and blaming her.
I know you as such a generally positive person. I know you wouldn’t go into a restaurant, look at the menu and then complain to the owner about the items on the menu you don’t like, or complain when your tablemates order something you wouldn’t eat. No! You would just focus on what brings you joy, order it and enjoy the meal with friends. So, stop complaining and leave Whitney to do her thing, even if you don’t understand and have some unexplainable negative bias towards her. Some of us here appreciate her work. Maybe one day you’ll join our club, maybe when your fascination with poor old dead J Edgar ends.
Great and well researched response GB
I did miss all that optimism….good to see it !
BUT
She loses me at “So, some people hear this stuff and get black-pilled and worried.”
Of course they do DUH…IS ANY OF THIS SUPPOSED TO MAKE US HAPPY AND OPTIMISTIC ? …she is spilling very detailed dark black pilled rhetoric
It’s like …hey look at what I found out… the whole world is a deeply corrupt and disgusting cesspool of hate violence deciet lies depravity AND HOMOSEXUAL PEDOPHILIA and there is nothing you can do about it
All your leaders institutions and entertainers…left right and center are on the same team so your hope and dreams are not worth having because they will always control every facet of your life
..BUT Hey…don’t worry be happy…go build something …LA LA LA LA LA LA
Her whole focus is on This Evil cabal that has us all by the malls all day every day . Everyone who is in power is in one it.
And YOU call that Optimism ?
Now I like WW even less than I did when I discovered she made up a story about a dead guy with scant to no documentation
“Whitney Webb is just providing information that she digs up, not selling anything”
Of course she is selling something…She has a website and is featured on a lot of podcasts and has written books
There is income from You Tube Videos and Book Sales and performing on podcasts with millions of viewers….and she of course is entitled to get paid for her work ..but she IS selling herself and her research
So we agree to disagree about this particular analyst
But we managed to do it in a civil way ( sort of ) 🙂
OK, I get it. You are hopeless! 😉