both of the twin towers were a problem . NOT rented. Less than 8000 people worked in both buildings.
They were full of asbestos that would have cost more to remove than either of the buildings cost to create.
AND the debt was due for a ‘roll-over’ that could not be accomplished.
AND they were doubly insured. It’s tricky. Investigate it. The buildings being destroyed paid off the debt and made the owner at the time very much more wealthy.

https://x.com/clif_high/status/1900538709126320560

 

 I wasn’t aware of the asbestos angle………..or lack of rentals……….neither was revealed at time of the implosions