Loading ...Dr. Mike Yeadon Ivermectin Anti-Fertility Bombshell: “One Of The Most Violent Fertility Toxins”
Note: At the tent we strive to understand “what” is being said — whether it makes sense or is hogwash can sometimes be irrelevant – information travels swiftly whether it is true or false! Use your god given common sense when new information hits the grapevine!!
Renowned pharmacologist Dr. Mike Yeadon has dropped a massive Ivermectin bombshell, calling it “one of the most violent fertility toxins” he’s ever seen. His comments were recorded back in June 2024 but were just posted yesterday on the Delingpod Live channel- sending a massive shock wave across the internet.
AND
Dr Mike Yeadon Ivermectin Anti-Fertility Bombshell: “One Of The Most Violent Fertility Toxins”
5 minutes
It’s repulsive when those fighting tyranny are attacked by others supposedly on the same side. Yeadon is accusing doctors (that have lost their good names and livelihoods) of knowingly recommending “alternative treatments that are toxic” to safeguard agains’t military bioweapons that are genocidal. No proof is provide – just a vague reference to a stack of papers – on a theory based on the conjecture that viruses don’t exist period. Therefore those doctors trying to save the world must only be doing so for personal gain.
Yeadon makes himself appear incredibly small minded and irrelevant by projecting that only he knows everything! Show us the science that proves your case before you question the morals and ethics of doctors like Meryl Nass, Ryan Cole, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Pierre Kory and thousands more around the world!
There is a mountain of evidence that what Yeadon is saying is true. The research is damning. I brought this up many months ago because I was so suspicious about who was pushing the drug and why the Ivermectin story seemed designed to be such a large part of the alternative media’s message to its membership. Looks like I was not wrong after all. Ivermectin is the suckers punch from left field that knocks down the best and brightest from the camp of vaccine resistors.
Hi Farmer — I don’t doubt that you did post something in the past, however, this is the first time that I personally have seen any reference to Ivermectin being toxic in any way.
I checked the tent for your earlier post but couldn’t find anything. The only one that pops up is about Rafoxanide (although Ivermectin was mentioned as to how you found the link to Rafoxanide). https://goldtadise.com/?p=593811
Could you elaborate on your understanding of research done that confirms Ivermectin toxicity and where/when they uncovered that it impairs female fertility???
It has always been my understanding that Ivermectin is considered one of the safest drugs in the world with over 4 billion pills prescribed to patients and was the winner of a Nobel Prize for positive impact on humanity. These don’t seem to fit with a “toxic” product descriptor (but lots of strange things are occurring in medicine these days).
My post was intended to make readers aware of what is being said about Ivermectin but my disgust is the infighting that is underway.
If Ivermectin has been scientifically proven to be toxic than we just need to understand the science.
But this fighting between separate “groups” fighting tyranny (Yeardon, Bailey etc vs names in my post etc) simply cast negativity upon both groups — this is unhelpful, stupid and childish infighting basically about I’m more right than you are! Really who gives a F*** when we have a cabal of narcissistic psychopaths trying to depopulate the planet. The few that understand what’s happening are ensuring defeat with these “my theory is better than your theory” wastes of time & effort.
No doubt the globalist forces cheer in delight when issues turn from science to personalities.
Here is a link to my post from July 10 2023(about one year back). You also wrote a comment as the thread grew to be quite fat since Fully and I were arguing about the virtue and lack of virtue in the alternative community.
Potential Risks From Using Ivermectin
https://goldtadise.com/?p=586792
Thanks Farmer — am glad you found it and confused as to why my search didn’t catch it!
I still don’t remember it but that is trending to happen as I get old(er) — clearly I added a link to the somewhat heated debate that ensued……
Will have to re-read your original post to see if it addresses this infertility issue.
Yeadon is one of the most honesat brokers we have heard all through the Covid scandals.
I am not Buying this at all
Ivermectin has been used in Africa for Decades and Decades and there doesn’t seem to be a fertility problem there
Explain that …show us proof that the Countries in Africa where this drug is over the counter have declining fertility and population over the last 50 years
I have believed that Yeadon is honest but aslo believe all the others in the IVM camp are honest as well
FWIW
Yeadon is retired and did NOT lose any credentials like all the other Doctors on team IVM
Also this thesis is supported by some IMO shady people like Interest of Justice ( lunatics IMO)
and Sage Hanna…I have first hand experience wth this guy in some exchanges at his site
He has it in for ALL these Doctors. He is VILE and deranged IMO
Watch Ryan Cole’ work and then tell me if you don’t think he is honest
https://www.nature.com/articles/ja201711
A 15 min read regarding Ivermectin. History and applications.
From my limited experience from over 20 years ago, it was effective in parasitic infestation control in livestock. I had sheep for 10 years. Gave it IM. I believe twice a year. My neighbour a few concessions over had a large flock and had been using it since it was approved for animals. He had no fertility issues that I know of all those years.
All his ewes bred.
The whole virus no virus debate needs to be looked into further to finally set the record straight. Both sides should meet to give their evidence. An open discussion.
Come on now guys lets think this through a little bit
As Columbia says this drug is used WIDlEY In Vet Medicine
Farmers certainly would not continue to use it if there were fertility problems
AND
IF IVM was an anti fertility drug wouldnt the Eugenicists be PROMOTING it…Instead they heve spent Billions trying to discredit it
The Doctors who promoted it have lost their licences to practice. Why would they want to do that if they didn’t believe in it
I don’t know why Yeadon is on this but as I said above his allies are suspect to say the least
In his work Geert explains the HOW. Did Yeadon do that here?
And I’m with Fully. Where is the empirical evidence?
Africa seems like the relevant lab.
Next up, the ranches and vet experience.
The burden is on Yeadon here.