Encouraging, but as a guy who looks at test results often, I looked for the reported margin of error. It was +/5%. All the results were within that band, so the shift could very easily have been polling error. I hope it wasn’t as we could all use some good news.
I wonder what the numbers would have looked like 20, 50 or 100 years ago?
Encouraging, but as a guy who looks at test results often, I looked for the reported margin of error. It was +/5%. All the results were within that band, so the shift could very easily have been polling error. I hope it wasn’t as we could all use some good news.
I wonder what the numbers would have looked like 20, 50 or 100 years ago?