Loading ...Public Must Reduce Standard of Living by 75% to Stop ‘Global Warming,’ Media Warns
n order for an individual to lower their carbon “waste” below the WEF-friend limit, every individual would have to give up personal car use, energy usage, meat-eating, and other “wasteful” necessities.
The average person’s lifestyle would have to change dramatically in order to comply with an “ultra-low carbon green lifestyle.”
For most people, this “lifestyle” would mean abject poverty and misery and a prison-like life where there is very little travel allowed, and minimal, if any, freedoms.
While this may already sound extreme, others in the green cult believe that even a limit of two metric tons of carbon footprint per person per year is still too much.
Some alarmists are suggesting just 1.4 metric tons instead by the year 2040 with further reduction to just 0.7 metric tons per year per person by the year 2050.
For some reason, the BBC ignored Communist China in its reporting on the worst carbon-emitting countries.
https://slaynews.com/news/public-must-reduce-standard-living-75-stop-global-warming-media-warns/
You are all being brought down to Third World standards of consumption and energy usage in case you did not know. What the targets imply is what I live every single day. I live in a region that has only one or two private vehicles for each hundred persons. That means the vast majority walk, take buses and motorbikes or use bicycles to get around. Which is fine if you live in a year round hot climate but in Prairie Canada it will feel like utter hell.
You won’t be able to live in a rural community. You won’t be able to live in the suburbs either. For this to work as suggested means most people in a city like Regina will have to be squeezed into the center of the city in small apartments to enable walking to work and shops. And this is exactly what is being proposed by the 15 minute city model. Anyone living outside the zones will effectively be cut off from all services. I mean ALL services.
Because the model does not account for anyone living a rural farming lifestyle nor does it discuss keeping roads, bridges, telecom, medical, government, financial, postal, electrical transmission or other services alive to support far flung communities. I hope everyone here reading understands that. Its not just that your consumption of fuels and supplies will diminish but your basic ability to enjoy freedom of choice about where you live will be challenged to the extremes. Not many people are able to live a rural life as it is. But without basic services that number is surely infinitesimally small.