Goldtent TA Paradise

Dr. Ryan Cole Addresses Covid-19 Jab Claims: Graphene Oxide, Nanotech, Parasites

1. Fullgoldcrown says:

   March 26, 2023 - 2:17 am at 2:17 am

   There are some pretty heavyweight commenters on this piece ( it was posted in December)

   These Guys are obviously way more into this stuff than any of us .

   There is quite a debate in this community. The science of what is in the vials is NOT settled. Some very strong support for Cole’s observations and some very strong rebuttals.

   All agree that even if there is No Nanotech or Graphine in the vials The mRNA spike protein Producing component is poison

   Unfortunately the Science on what other toxins / technology is in the damn thing is NOT settled

   • Farmer says:

     March 26, 2023 - 6:19 am at 6:19 am

     One thing we can all likely agree on…..this is a criminal operation. The injections are poisonous, toxic, likely a bioweapon and ultimately their design is to soft-kill the majority of people whp take them while permanently sterilizing those who survive. Anything that changes your DNA, a fact that is admitted to, cannot be for our well being.

     Lets not forget, they were given out to counter the common cold in the beginnning. Nobody told us what was inside the vials. For three years now we have been gas-lit and lied too, manipulated and intimidated, badgered, harrassed, insulted, demeaned, threatened, cornered, terminated from our jobs and even killed in some cases over the head of this so-called flu shot.

     Something else is clearly going on here. They want this liquid in our veins. They want it done really, really badly.

     Why? Well we had better start taking a closer look at the contents of those vials and asking hard questions. Kestrel does not want to hear it. I say too bad. Because I will not be silent. Those assholes pushing this jab agenda killed my Mom with their shots. I have a right to my indignation and a right to an examination of the facts. Even if that is with a microscope. Someone will be held accountable eventually.

2. Farmer says:

   March 26, 2023 - 8:40 am at 8:40 am

   So who is taking the other side of the trade? Well there are a large number of people in opposition to Ryan Coles weak analysis and dismissive tone about what he sees under a microscope slide. Some of those on the other side hardly need introduction. I am listing a cast below of people who are seriously discussing the topic of nanotech in the vaccinations and the direct impacts of damage to the blood of the vaccinated. This is a brief list of respected names. Most are well known. People of good reputation. Let’s cover them and see how it stacks up. These people do not necessarily share Ryan Coles opinion.

   La Quinta Columna – Ricardo Delgado – Microscopic experts- Investigative Laboratory
   Dr David Nixon – Brisbane GP – Dark Field Microscopy
   Dr. Zandre Botha of South Africa – Blood Microscopy Expert
   Sasha Latypova – Pharma R&D Executive 25 years experience
   Karen Kingston – Biotech Industry Business Researcher and Strategy
   Dr Shimon Yanowitz -Nanotechnology Researcher
   Matt Taylor – Engineer researching vaccine samples
   Mike Yeadon – Pfizer Scientist and Researcher
   Senator Rand Paul – Physician
   Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of Childrens Health Defence Fund
   Kelly Bacher – Live Blood Analyst from Canada
   Dr Ana Maria Mihalcea – Internal Medicine Physician
   Dr Felipe Reitz of Brazil – Biologist – Thermographic blood imaging expert
   Dr Dr. Liliana Zelada – Dentist – Live microscope analysis of vaccine vials
   Dr. Reiner Fuellmich – Lawyer leading the Corona Investigative Committee
   Dr Judy Mikovitz – Virologist and Research Scientist
   Dr. Lee Merritt – Orthopedic and Spinal Surgeon
   Todd Callender – Disability and Life Insurance Lawyer

   That is in one corner of the debate. In the other corner we have Kestrel. When he saw my recent post about blood analysis (from a professional who specializes in blood analysis no less) he wrote “I believe this is WACKO…enough fear porn…much more important things to pay attention to– an understatement..

   So which side of the trade wold you prefer to take? You want to put your bets on Ryan Cole or do you want to put your bets on the list of people above. If you are wrong it could kill you btw, so getting the information right is kind of important as it will tell you how to personally conduct yourself when in close contact with the vaccinated. For example, lets go with Kestrels view that this is all Whacko. Well in that case then you are free to have sex with vaccinated people. Because no problem. But if you are wrong you might possibly absorb the poisons being shed from the DNA changing spike proteins into yourself and probably shorten your own life.

   Is it a coin flip? Or maybe we just trust the professionals on this one hmmmm?

3. Farmer says:

   March 26, 2023 - 9:18 am at 9:18 am

   The point of the posts above is that we cannot put the Genie back in the bottle. After three years of testimony, there is an overwhelming amount of evidence that the vaccinations contain toxic ingredients that are having a serious, even life threatening impact on the blood of people who accepted shots. There is no going back and pretending that everything we have learned to date does not count all of a sudden. Fully, you must agree with me here if you are rational man (which I know you to be), we cannot dismiss blood evidence from a specialist just because we saw it on the Stew Peters Show. We need something stronger than that to refute the evidence coming forward. It is not as though this Canadian Blood Analyst is saying anything new. She is just the latest to offer her findings.

   As for Kestrel, I hope you will open your mind a little more. Nobody is lying to you on this subject.

4. Fullgoldcrown says:

   March 26, 2023 - 9:22 am at 9:22 am

   Here is a guy commenting on the Vigilant Fox Post re Ryan Cole

   Seems like he is a Science “Sceptic ” on many levels and seems to have a lot of experience with this

   https://substack.com/profile/97278428-the-science-analyst

   here are spome of his comments

   The Science Analyst
   Writes The Science Analyst
   Dec 12, 2022
   Liked by The Vigilant Fox
   I tried to discuss this graphneoxide for a year with some hardcore people. I recognized the cholesterol similarity right away. And I know what real nano-tech looks like, because I designed some. They look completely different, with lots of parallel lines and similar structures. Never got any normal answer.

   Generally the grapheneoxide story is is just based on some patents where they want to use grapheneoxide instead of Lipid Nano Particles (LNP). This is a future plan, and currently science fiction. But companies often use science-fiction patents to prepare a future monopoly for when the LPNs are no longer protected by patents. I wonder if any of those plans are even possible.

   Another problem is that most people do not know how powerful mRNA is. It can make any protein that you want. So with it you can figuratively turn a human into a frog, by replacing all active human RNA with frog RNA.. Practically you can use mRNA to drug people to compliance or to sleep. And we do not know what mRNA is injected exactly.

   Officially the mRNA is making a toxic spike-protein that attacks all of your body. For months. And I wonder why people think that any of that is OK.

   But if you repeat a story long enough, people start to think it is real, I guess. It is on all sides. Just like most doctors believe that all vaccines work and are safe. Or that peer-review is good for science.

5. Fullgoldcrown says:

   March 26, 2023 - 9:25 am at 9:25 am

   The Science Analyst
   Writes The Science Analyst
   Dec 15, 2022
   AI Chatbot? You have not read my articles clearly. The science fiction statement is based on my experience with the scientific papers.

   We probably both agree that astronomy is filled with science fiction? Like dark matter, black holes, and lots of things that are not visible at all.

   In the same sense do I look at medical science papers. What did they really find? What is the real-world data? How much did they fill in with fantasy and science fiction? And how much of the article is focused on selling a product instead of showing a discovery?

   Additionally we have ghostwriting as the major problem in medical science. It means that the article is written by Pfizer or Moderna marketing. By signing the papers the scientists get a lot of funding for projects. It is probably combined with non-disclosure-agreements. So you will not hear the bad news. Like that it kills people. Or that it is actually not effective.

   So, medical science has therefore more science fiction than astronomy. And I think that the graphene oxide papers are among those. Since I see no actual results, or clear data. They are just projecting possible usage.

   ……………..

   The Science Analyst
   Writes The Science Analyst
   Dec 15, 2022
   Yes. You found the patent that I referred to. Now what? Did they use it or not? And for now it looks like they have not used that patent.

   There are also patents about UFOs and I do not see many of them around now. We have to look at actual data and actual results. I think this probably does not even work, because it may damage the cells. And it may not even release the mRNA.

   We also know from the official ingredients that this mRNA is extremely toxic and should never be used in any form. So why would they even try variants when their original stuff is already “working as intended”?

   Many of the crystals in the video are clearly cholesterol. There was glass too. And there was stuff from a house-plant. I also could also recognize CO2 bubbles in another video, where lots of black stuff was showing.

   Now compare this to a simple chip. Zoom into a microchip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fxv3JoS1uY8 You see a lot of lines and small similar components. These have to be made with extremely accurate machines.

6. Fullgoldcrown says:

   March 26, 2023 - 9:29 am at 9:29 am

   These injections are already toxic with things that can be proven with clear science. Focus on the things that can be proven without doubt.

   The Science Analyst
   Writes The Science Analyst

   I had the disease. Was like a bad flu with months long blood problems. All the testing was indeed completely fake. I think that they released the virus in different parts of the world. And in that sense Karen Kinston might be on to something. But the injections are extremely toxic and people pushing for it should be punished.

   ……………………

   The Science Analyst
   Writes The Science Analyst
   Dec 12, 2022
   Ryan Cole explains how he came to the conclusion with all the available data. He also allows you to study his ideas further and get more data. That is different from an “expert” who just claims that a very experimental “vaccine” is “safe and effective”. Without any data to back it up, and asks you not to ask any further questions nor look at data yourself. Science is a process of observation and logic reasoning that we all can share.

   The grapheneoxide was first a hypothesis, because some people in Spain thought there were some similarities. And based on a patent that theoretically used the technique. From their research came others with the false 99% grapheneoxide claim. And certain people just called everything strange grapheneoxide. They made it a hype. Just like the magnetic arm hype.

   To be fair, the graphenexode was never supported by good analysis. Any video that I saw just claimed that “it” was grapheneoxide, without comparing it with other substances. I also saw that cholesterol was looking extremely similar. So it was either cholesterol or a different lipid (from the lipid nano particles). I even considered pollution from graphene filters used in the laboratories. Usually you first start with things that you can expect to be in such a liquid.

   But the “experts” in grapheneoxide never compared these with other possiblities. And then jumped to make extreme futuristic claims that these were nanotech circuits that connected people’s brains to 5G. That last step was clearly false, because I know how to design a 5G chip with nanotechnology, and it looks very different. And that is why I distrusted these “experts” in their claims and conclusions. But I do respect their observations. And I sometimes suggested different tests in their videos, which they never responded to.

   And as Ryan Cole shows in his interview: you can find stuff in your sample that are came in from your surroundings or your tools. This can be very confusing. And I think that his experience with this kind of stuff is excellent, as he could immediately point out how the “hydra” likely came from a plant.

   • pedro_deleon says:

     March 26, 2023 - 1:04 pm at 1:04 pm

     “But the “experts” in grapheneoxide never compared these with other possiblities. And then jumped to make extreme futuristic claims that these were nanotech circuits that connected people’s brains to 5G. That last step was clearly false, because I know how to design a 5G chip with nanotechnology, and it looks very different. And that is why I distrusted these “experts” in their claims and conclusions. But I do respect their observations. And I sometimes suggested different tests in their videos, which they never responded to.”

     This is where my thought process has been.

7. Fullgoldcrown says:

   March 26, 2023 - 9:31 am at 9:31 am

   The Science Analyst
   Writes The Science Analyst
   Dec 13, 2022
   “Comprimised” – As an expert in nanotechnology, I have only seen bullshit being produced from the GO promoters. You need huge machines and clean rooms to make nanotechnology. Very pure silicon. Very well defined circuitry. Thousands of chemical processes with ultra-violet lasers. Not something that you inject in a human body.

   For something that reacts to 5G you need additional things like an antenna and power source. Also pretty big stuff. Your mobile phone probably has a huge spiral antenna to receive messages. Would be the first thing that you would see under a microscope. You can just see it with your eyes.

8. Farmer says:

   March 26, 2023 - 9:35 am at 9:35 am

   Fully, you cannot imagine what it takes to get a patent. I am a patent holder. My wife and I created a process to make cardboard furniture. You need to actually prove your idea works in order to get it through. It cannot be conjecture or an interesting idea or merely novel or even a decent probability. To receive a patent your industrial process must actually work and be proveable with citations and backup evidence. The strange comment above about UFO’s above is completely off base. That is how you discredit the good work of others. It does not pass the smell test anyway. What UFO patents is he talking about? Because a patent holder will not get his patent unless the idea actually flies.

   • Fullgoldcrown says:

     March 26, 2023 - 9:51 am at 9:51 am

     Or unless you are a big corporation and can buy a patent.

9. Fullgoldcrown says:

   March 26, 2023 - 9:36 am at 9:36 am

   My Point is…there are 2 sides to this story. As a layman each of us can only observe and then deduce .

   Then there is the EYE test

   Many hundreds of people in my circles and almost all of them are vaxxed for a year or 2 and hardly any of them are maimed or dead that I know of ( maybe 1% )….so we watch and wait for clues . But for now I am with Ryan and Del and Vigilant Fox and the Science Analyst ( plus a few more commenters )

   I see malice and murder but not an the scale suggested by the inclusion of nanotech and 5 G

   • Farmer says:

     March 26, 2023 - 9:44 am at 9:44 am

     Whooooaaaa there! Seriously?

     How about 40% excess death rates?
     How abut 82% miscarriage rates in Canada
     Did you forget about the live birth crash taking place everywhere. Stunning numbers.
     And then there is the disability rates. Off the charts using metadata. a 13 standard deviation move!
     You cannot possibly come to fixed conclusions from anecdotal evidence in your neighborhood.
     Or what about the myocarditis events in children. Absolutely unprecedented.

     Fully, keep your eye on the big picture. This is very disturbing stuff.
     I agree there are two sides to the story.
     There is a pack of lies……. and there is the truth.

     • Fullgoldcrown says:

       March 26, 2023 - 10:05 am at 10:05 am

       We agree there is an agenda and there are excess deaths and excess disabilities.

       We disagree that EVERYONE vaxxed is gonna die and is a toxic machine to be avoided

       My life is not an anecdote though. I am just not seeing or hearing of the kind of death and destruction implied here.

       There are lies AND misunderstandings …they come from both sides…it’s the fog of war

       • Farmer says:

         March 26, 2023 - 10:25 am at 10:25 am

         LOL…ok brother sorry, Didn’t mean to say your life was a mere anecdote.
         I just mean compared to metadata studies of thousands of people. Hahahaha

         • Fullgoldcrown says:

           March 26, 2023 - 10:35 am at 10:35 am

           🙂

           Good discussion brother

           I think we showed “em” how to have a passionate but civil discussion.

           Also this brings to light what complexities we are up against

         • Farmer says:

           March 26, 2023 - 10:42 am at 10:42 am

           Indeed. My conclusion is a large part of humanity is doomed! LOL

     • pedro_deleon says:

       March 26, 2023 - 1:11 pm at 1:11 pm

       FCG “but not an the scale suggested by the inclusion of nanotech and 5 G”

       F: “How about 40% excess death rates?”

       That takes the annual death rate from something “LIKE” 1% per year to 1.4%

       Yes, that’s observable but its not Chicxulub.
       The REAL problem is that Something Like This could happen, at all.
       Lots of Centralized Power, too much Trust in Public Institutions, and a dearth of Critical Thinking. The middle one is shrinking fast but the others remain.

       • Farmer says:

         March 26, 2023 - 1:26 pm at 1:26 pm

         Excess death rates have not tapered off though. They remain at high levels suggesting that this added mortality will continue long into the future. When you consider that in conjunction with sharply falling birth rates the equation on population growth changes dramatically. You may not see a billion people vanish overnight but the combination of persistant high death rates and low live birth rates still gets the equation to a falling population and much lower life expectancy numbers. Lets review it in 20 years and see where it stands. By then almost everyone you know will be gone and the schools will all be closed because….no kids!

10. Columbia says:

    March 26, 2023 - 5:32 pm at 5:32 pm

    Just my 2 cents.
    I’m of the thought that these shots were contaminated due to the tremendous push to produce enough shots for the entire world. Intentional? I have no idea.

    I believe the shots were a dry run for testing compliance in the population. Were the shots tested for safety and effectiveness. Hell no! Never been tested in humans before on a mass scale.

    Were all the shots uniform? Possibly not. The analysis of the batches causing the most harm appears to show this.
    It was a compliance test for a Vaccine Card…….precursor to the WHO International Travel Vaccine ID Card. If they are able to pass the WHO Pandemic Treaty modifications, they know which countries will comply. Also since they are the pushing the Climate Change Scamdemic they can control our movement and consumption while “asset stripping” our wealth through bogus carbon taxes.

    It’s a multi-step process. Wear us down, keep us fearful and offer the solution.

    So what’s in these shots? Nothing that works, only harm.

    As to people dying from the shots. I only hear anecdotal reports. Some I know but not well. Many are complete strangers. I do have people tell me that they have no energy, blood clots, myocarditis or can’t shake the respiratory illness. Lots! What are their long-term health consequences????? We just don’t know at this time.