Goldtent TA Paradise

TOM LUONGO …EPIC…FLOODING THE ZONE

1. Fullgoldcrown says:

   February 22, 2023 - 7:17 pm at 7:17 pm

   I grew up an enormous sports fan, especially the NFL. I
   bled NY Giant blue growing up in the 1970’s and they were so
   bad for so long I thought I’d bleed out before they ever made
   the playoffs, no less won a Super Bowl.
   I’m a “defense wins championships” kinda guy. So, I loved Bill
   Parcells, who coached my Giants to two Super Bowl wins, in my
   opinion, the right way – efficient, safe offense coupled with
   superlative defense. I’d rather watch a 2-1 pitcher’s duel in
   baseball or a 1-0 goaltending exhibition than a game of
   basketball, any game of basketball, where points flow like
   handouts from Congress at a military contractor road show.
   But in the late 1990’s I fell out of love with the NFL. The game
   was dominated by systems and scripts. It stagnated under the
   weight of groupthink in offensive and defensive designs.
   Sports is on-the-fly storytelling. It is supposed to celebrate
   spontaneity and individual effort but within a team concept
   that represents your values and your community.
   NFL football had become so big and important that coaches
   would rather ‘lose the right way’ than take a chance to ‘win the
   wrong way.’ Free agency destroyed the community of our
   teams. Complexity dominated to that point that playbooks
   were as big as sections of the Federal Register. It begged for
   someone to find a simple solution. And it got that.
   When Buddy Ryan introduced the ‘Zone Blitz’ to the game
   everything changed, for the better. For a while. A league
   dominated by the Bill Walsh/Sid Gilman “West Coast Offense,”
   finally began to take a backseat to defense going on the attack.
   All of those complicated formations, misdirections, and high
   probability short passes were disrupted by simply flooding with
   one side of the field with seven guys to rush the quarterback
   and take away his time to read.
   Ryan would ‘flood the zone’ with more men than the offense
   could block. If the quarterback picked the right ‘zone’ the blitz
   was coming from he could dump the ball off to the open man
   for a big gain

   If he didn’t he was staring at the field from his back and facing
   ‘second and 22.’
   Spontaneity had returned briefly to the NFL. But, it quickly
   became a guessing game. Now every play was a coin toss. I
   hated the ‘West Coast Offense’ even more now because it gave
   rise to the ‘Zone Blitz.’
   A pox on both of their houses.
   No matter what tweaks the NFL Rules Committee make every
   year to mitigate this devolution of the sport, the basic
   framework is the same, the game is fundamentally broken.
   In our political life, flooding the zone looks like the endless
   procession of emergencies, scandals, and manufactured crises
   which keep everyone guessing where the next attack of the
   globalist blitz will come from.
   Denial is Not Just a River
   When you think about the ‘Zone Blitz’ as an idea it’s a negation
   thing. It’s saying I have no way to beat you other than to not
   let you play the game. I will deny you agency.
   In any gaming environment, if there is a ‘lock-out’ strategy
   everyone is racing for, the game itself is fundamentally flawed.
   Imagine playing chess but where you could make a move that
   denied your opponent the right to use his rooks or his queen.
   Or a game of Texas Hold ‘em where you can deny someone
   their hole cards.
   I despise games like this. In fact, I’d argue they aren’t games at
   all. But do you know who does like them? Control freaks,
   sociopaths, and bullies. I spent a lot of my life around people
   like this, who, frankly, get off on destroying their opponents.
   The parallels between sports/games and the current
   geopolitical and financial landscape should be obvious.
   These are the same people who have their feet on the scale of
   what is publicly acceptable. And if someone steps out of line,
   well, it’s time for them to lose their voice

   We all like to believe we live in a world where the rules are
   equally applicable to all people. That’s what we’re told, anyway.
   When the reality, of course, is that access to the ‘rules
   committee’ is what determines who wins and who loses.
   Or even, who is allowed to play.
   We’re less than two months into 2023 and one thing is very
   clear to me, the great globalist project is running into serious
   opposition.
   There has been a general awakening happening all over the
   world to some aspects of the plans of these people I like to call
   The Davos Crowd. Not everyone gets it, certainly, but enough
   do that Davos is having to react aggressively.
   For years, they’ve come after the easily marginalized – “The AltRight,” “Alex Jones,” “Conspiracy Theorists,” etc. – and it was
   child’s play for them to convince normal people that these were
   the fringe who abused their ‘free speech.’
   They were ‘zone blitzed’ out of the public with lawsuits,
   pressure campaigns, and deplatforming. It was chilling then
   and it’s chilling now.
   One recent example is the removal of the head of the World
   Bank, David Malpass. Malpass was a Trump appointee who
   publicly questioned the CO2-as-planet-killer narrative and was
   roasted for it. A recent struggle session ensued, he was forced
   to apologize for his heresy and resign.
   Now, Davos thinks it can continue to make the world safe for its
   ESG corporate credit score having
   clawed back the top of one of its
   globalist pillars of their planned
   technocracy, just in time for the EU
   to roll out new, more stringent
   ESG-related rules for importers.
   Malpass is an important win for
   Davos but it’s not going to move the
   needle with the public like going after anyone investigating
   Pfizer or Hunter Biden.
   What’s happening today is different because these tactics now
   carry a far different message than before.
   Shutting up Andrew Anglin or Richard Spencer is one thing.
   They trigger people’s disgust circuit so thoroughly justifying to
   themselves taking away their rights as people can be excused as
   a necessary evil to protect the community.
   The ‘zone blitz’ against people like Dr. Peter McCullough is
   something far different. The recent move to oust James O’Keefe
   from Project Veritas had all of us, myself included, jumping up
   immediately to tie this to his bombshell report tying Pfizer to
   directed evolution.
   This was another ‘zone blitz’ against a real journalist out of
   revenge and damage control.
   This is no different than the ongoing revenge against Julian
   Assange, keeping him shut up in prison for publishing
   information given to him and Wikileaks.
   Davos’ zone blitz strategy, however, has begun to change from
   one of denial that there is anything wrong to covering up that
   which they’ve done because their crimes have broken
   containment.
   It is the crimes that will enflame people’s passions. This is why
   the O’Keefe story is important. Millions of people immediately

   went there. The meme has fully broken containment and the
   signal can’t be stopped now, no matter how much they try.
   At its core too many people had the sinking feeling that
   COVID-19 wasn’t just a pandemic that it was the opening
   gambit in a war against humanity itself. O’Keefe’s trapping the
   Senior Engineer at Pfizer just further confirmed what we all
   knew in our hearts to be true.
   And this is why Davos is flooding the zone, because once this
   shibboleth – trusting the science – collapses, all the other
   projects that are based on this premise lose all public support as
   well.
   Three Eroding Pillars
   There are three major operations happening right now that
   form the foundation for Davos’ desired Great Reset project.
   They are 1) the War in Ukraine, 2) the imposition of
   transnational governance through global health policy and 3)
   replacing the old monetary system with a new one.
   All three are glued together by fundamentally anti-capitalist
   rhetoric mixed with direct assaults on the transportation and
   production of basic economic goods all in the name of fighting
   Climate Change.
   There are a number of ways to view the Great Reset and the
   massive logistics infrastructure needed to implement it. But it
   devolves into those three operations at their core.
   And if you look around the
   headlines today you can see clearly
   that all three of these operations
   have hit major stumbling blocks.
   The War in Ukraine is going badly
   for the Ukrainians. Having failed
   to trap thousands of Russian troops
   near Kherson during last fall’s
   offensive, NATO now has very little political leverage over
   Russian President Vladimir Putin to force him to step down or
   accept a settlement.
   The meatgrinder that is Bakhmut is working out to the
   Russians’ advantage having slowly won the attrition war there
   leaving the Ukrainians in very bad shape. Even NATO Secretary
   General Jens Stoltenberg is finally admitting that Ukraine is ‘out
   of ammunition’ and the race is on to supply the front while
   Russia continues to bomb Ukraine’s physical infrastructure to
   make that difficult.
   Whether Russia has the capabilities to take full advantage of
   this or not is a different discussion.
   From Davos’ perspective, one major narrative, Ukraine is
   winning, is collapsing.
   The second operation, a Health Superstate, was delivered major
   blows before James O’Keefe’s reporting. It is also in serious
   trouble. The combination of the loosening the speech controls
   at Twitter in the wake of Elon Musk’s takeover of the company
   and an ascendent minority within the GOP delegation in
   Congress, has opened up the floodgates of attention on the
   COVID-19 vaccination program.
   This is rapidly becoming a story about misuse of public funds,
   abuse of public trust, and corruption at the highest levels of
   government rather than a clarion call for global governance to
   protect public health.

   Politicians previously drunk on absolute powers granted to
   them during COVID-19, like New Zealand’s Jacinda Ardern, are
   being driven out of power. The Social Democratic Party (SPD)
   in Germany just lost the Berlin regional election to the Christian
   Democratic Union (CDU) for the first time in 24 years. Given
   the results, I don’t expect much effective change at the national
   level yet, this is a signpost that German politics is shifting hard
   away from the Green Party mafia shepherded into place by
   Davos through Angela Merkel.
   Here at home, there is profit for normally feckless Republicans
   on Capitol Hill to go after members of the “Biden”
   Administration and its corporate partner, Pfizer (NYSE:PFE).
   The case is building against President Biden and for previously
   protected apparatchiks from political and legal fallout.
   The last operation, transforming the global monetary system,
   has also sailed directly into the iceberg of the Federal Reserve.
   At February’s FOMC meeting the Fed raised the Fed Funds Rate
   another 0.25%, foregoing the option of a second 0.50% hike.
   The US economic data continues to defy critics, coming in
   stronger than expected and supporting my contention from last
   month that there will be no recession in the US in 2023.
   January’s CPI was slightly higher than expectations.
   The markets finally began waking up to this reality and false
   signals coming
   from the US
   yield curve. US
   Treasury
   Secretary Janet
   Yellen has been
   fighting the Fed
   by mobilizing
   the Treasury’s
   general account
   to sell short term
   debt (2/3 year
   notes) to buy
   long term debt
   (10, 20, and 30
   year notes/
   bonds). This is
   her putting her
   thumb on the
   scale of the yield inversion between the 2-year and the 10-year,
   currently between 0.75% and 0.80%. This helps fuel an
   historic mispricing of US debt, feeding the traditional view that
   inversions equal recessions.
   To all of these we can add Seymour Hersh’s bombshell article
   on the Biden administration’s year-plus plans to blow up the
   Nordstream pipelines which the Davos controlled media is both
   trying to stuff down the memory hole but also use to further
   amplify the ‘US as rogue empire’ malign actor cover story.
   Hersh’s article is a perfectly timed Molotov cocktail that now
   requires levels of damage control previously thought beyond
   the pale.
   Balloons!
   Game Over, Man!
   Cue the “Chinese Spy Balloon” story and it quickly morphing
   into a certain Kinks song, becoming the theme music for the
   next resurrection of the X-Files.

   The reason there’s a ‘little green man’ in our heads is because
   Davos helped put them there with their ever more bizarre
   narratives about the need for global communism. Honestly, the
   things happening are so surreal alien invasion at this point I
   don’t blame anyone for having it on their whiteboard.
   So, we’re going to be inundated with hysteria after hysteria
   while the push for implementing the technical and regulatory
   structure of their technocratic dystopia accelerates below the
   headlines.
   It will happen where they still have the most power –
   California, the UK, the EU, Canada, and NATO. I could flood
   you with the headlines here but what is most important is that
   they are doing this because they are vulnerable.
   The distractions will be thick and heavy.
   When we have a US government officially denying that the
   military operations to shoot down objects over our airspaces in
   Montana and Michigan were alien objects and repeated by the
   New York Times, it begs some serious questions.
   And to me, the only one that matters is, “Where is the next big
   escalation in their war against us going to come from?”
   This is intentional. It’s designed to keep your frantic, jumping
   at shadows, and confused as to what their real aims are.
   The New York
   Times refused to
   cover Hersh’s
   article about the
   Nordstream
   bombings.
   Hersh’s article
   hasn’t been
   reported by the
   German media at
   all.
   Instead, we’re
   implored to, “DO
   LOOK UP!”
   Seeding aliens
   into the media
   cycle is just
   another variation on “I See Red People.” In the 21st century
   McCarthyism is the now the rallying cry of the political left,
   having demonized Russia to the point of justifying all-out war.
   Because the alien invasion negation is meant to lead people
   into the discussion of who actually floated these balloons. It is
   meant to unnerve us that Fortress America is crumbling. Russia
   and China’s arms are long enough now to reach into the
   heartland and it’s time to get serious about that war.
   This year’s Munich Security Conference should be the stage
   where they roll out the next escalation against Russia and
   China. It’s what they did last year while flooding the zone with
   stories about Russia’s impending attack on Ukraine, which they
   maneuvered Russia into.
   This time last year, Vice-President Kamala Harris was given a
   speech to read that read like an open declaration of war
   against Russia over its conflict with a non-NATO country.
   Then, On February 22, 2022, President Zelenskyy demanded
   nuclear weapons.

   George Soros skipped this year’s World Economic Forum Annual
   Meeting in Davos to prepare his speech for Munich. And, right
   on script, he called openly for NATO to confront Russia
   officially.
   The talk about Poland taking administrative control over
   western Ukraine may be disinformation chatter, but if the
   Donbass front collapses, placing a NATO army in the country as
   a tripwire for invoking Article 5, even if Article 5 doesn’t apply
   to hostilities against NATO troops in non-NATO countries makes
   sense.
   The US just issued a warning for all Americans to leave Russia
   now. France among a number of EU countries have issued a
   similar warning about Belarus. This is almost always a
   precursor to war.
   There are seismic events just over the horizon for the future of
   the global monetary system. Russia has survived the shock and
   awe of sanctions that Harris promised in last year’s Munich
   speech.
   The FOMC has won the war on monetary policy versus the ECB
   and the Eurodollar system. Global US dollar liquidity is drying
   up while opposition to further Ukraine monetary support from
   Congress is heating up.
   President Biden announced the end of all COVID-19 emergency
   measures for May 11th, one week after the May FOMC
   meeting.
   The fight on Capitol Hill over the raising the debt ceiling has
   been engaged fully. “Biden” will try again, like in 2021, to use
   it as a way to force new spending programs. The US was
   officially warned by both Moody’s and Fitch that a downgrade
   of US debt hangs in the balance.
   So, there is a replay of the summer of 2011 when Standard and
   Poor’s downgraded US debt from AAA to AA+, cueing up on
   that front just as LIBOR is ending at the end of June and
   trillions of dollars in dollar-denominated debt is threatened
   with repricing shock.
   Is it any wonder that they need to throw everything at us now
   to make something stick?
   And if they do it hard enough and fast enough they hope we
   won’t have time to read the zone blitz and, “just say no.”