Here’s the COVID Vaccine Injury Report CDC Was Forced to Release
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System safety signal analysis for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines shows clear safety signals for death and a range of highly concerning thrombo-embolic, cardiac, neurological, hemorrhagic, hematological, immune-system and menstrual adverse events among U.S. adults.
Summary
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) safety signal analysis based on reports from Dec. 14, 2020 – July 29, 2022, for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines shows clear safety signals for death and a range of highly concerning thrombo-embolic, cardiac, neurological, hemorrhagic, hematological, immune-system and menstrual adverse events (AEs) among U.S. adults.
- There were 770 different types of adverse events that showed safety signals in ages 18+, of which more than 500 (or 2/3) had a larger safety signal than myocarditis/pericarditis.
- The CDC analysis shows that the number of serious adverse events reported in less than two years for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is 5.5 times greater than all serious reports for vaccines given to adults in the U.S. since 2009 (~73,000 vs. ~13,000).
- Twice as many mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reports were classified as serious compared to all other vaccines given to adults (11% vs. 5.5%). This meets the CDC definition of a safety signal.
- There are 96 safety signals for 12-17 year-olds, which include: myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell’s Palsy, genital ulcerations, high blood pressure and heart rate, menstrual irregularities, cardiac valve incompetencies, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmias, thromboses, pericardial and pleural effusion, appendicitis and perforated appendix, immune thrombocytopenia, chest pain, increased troponin levels, being in intensive care and having anticoagulant therapy.
- There are 66 safety signals for 5-11 year-olds, which include: myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction and cardiac valve incompetencies, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest pain, appendicitis and appendectomies, Kawasaki’s disease, menstrual irregularities, vitiligo and vaccine breakthrough infection.
- The safety signals cannot be dismissed as due to “stimulated,” exaggerated, fraudulent or otherwise artificially inflated reporting, nor can they be dismissed due to the huge number of COVID-19 vaccines administered.
- In August 2022, the CDC told The Epoch Times that the results of their safety signal analysis “were generally consistent with EB [Empirical Bayesian] data mining [conducted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)], revealing no additional unexpected safety signals.”
So either the FDA’s data mining was consistent with the CDC’s method — meaning they “generally” found the same large number of highly alarming safety signals — or the signals they did find were expected. Or they were lying. We may never know because the FDA has refused to release their data mining results.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-vaers-covid-vaccines-serious-injuries/?
From COVID & COFFEE — Jan. 6, 2023
On Monday, the Epoch Times ran an investigative report headlined, “EXCLUSIVE: CDC Finds Hundreds of Safety Signals for Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 Vaccines.”
The Epoch Times’ investigative reporter got the results through a Freedom of Information Act request, after the CDC refused to make its data public. According to the report, the CDC internally analyzed adverse events reported between December 14th, 2020, and July 29th, 2022.
It won’t surprise you to find out the CDC has always used three types of statistical tests to link an adverse event to a vaccine. The tests use different statistical techniques to compare incidences of adverse events from the subject vaccine to the same incidences in existing vaccines already considered safe, like the flu vaccine.
Pfizer and Moderna failed all three of the CDC’s historical tests in the data accompanying its undisclosed analysis. But who cares? Wheee! Jab harder!
The Epoch Times sent the CDC’s data to several public health data experts. They crunched the information and discovered over FIVE HUNDRED different types of adverse events showing statistical signals even larger than myocarditis and pericarditis, including, not surprisingly, Bell’s palsy, blood clotting disorders, and sudden death.
At minimum, these signals should trigger further investigation, if not outright recall of the drugs, as one of the article’s experts recognized:
“We know that the signal for myocarditis is associated with something that is caused by the mRNA vaccines, so it’s more than reasonable to say that anything with a signal larger than myocarditis/pericarditis should be taken seriously and investigated,” Josh Guetzkow, an Israeli professor who trained in statistics at Princeton University and has been studying VAERS data during the pandemic, told The Epoch Times via email.
The article reported the FDA also analyzed the same data, using one of the CDC’s tests — a technique called Empirical Bayesian data mining — but so far has refused to release the results of its analysis. Shocking. I wonder why? One suspects, if the FDA’s analysis made the jabs look good, it would be all over corporate media by now.
The Epoch Times has made the CDC’s data available for download in the article, and independent analysts have been crunching the numbers all week. Stand by for updates.