Loading ...JEFF CHILDERS TAKE ON TWITTER FILES #7 ( SUPPRESSION OF HUNTER BIDON LAPTOP STORY
IN THE FIRST COMMENT
He sees this being HUGE and hints at a real remedy in the works
It would be an understatement to call all this an historic development. If Elon Musk hadn’t spent $44 BILLION DOLLARS to buy Twitter, nobody would have ever believed the extent to which the intelligence community has absorbed private social media platforms in this country and turned them against the people. It’s literally unbelievable.
Exposure will probably be fatal. The Constitution does not provide for any internal security service in the United States. The agencies are WAY off the reservation, well into criminal territory, no matter how clever their lawyers are. You want an insurrection? Just consider how deep the intelligence agencies have penetrated social media platforms and how the suppression of the Hunter story probably affected the election.
Of course, we still have the teensy-weensy little problem of “who” will charge and arrest these people, since they’re in control of the entire federal law enforcement apparatus. Don’t worry, there ARE answers. But let’s wait a little bit and see how things play out.
I am starting to wonder whether all this is really a coincidence, or if something bigger is afoot.
Dr. Michael Shellenberger posted the seventh installment of the Twitter Files yesterday. It was all about how the FBI and the larger intelligence community conducted a wide-ranging operation inside and outside Twitter to discredit the real facts about Hunter Biden’s laptop. It’s a clear picture of how the intelligence community manipulated Twitter management to cancel the embarrassing story and influence the U.S. election.
In January of 2020, some Twitter employees expressed concern over FBI Agent Elvis Chan’s intentions and the FBI’s social media dragnet, as seen in this email from Carlos Monje to Yoel Roth, disclosing a “sustained effort by the Intelligence Community to push us to share more information and change our API policies” to allow direct access into Twitter’s database:
“Elvis” again. Their good buddy.
In October 2020 — the month before the election — the Hunter Biden laptop story broke in the New York Post. Almost immediately, Twitter (and other social media companies) banned and locked down discussion about the story, and suspended the New York Post, even though it was a “mainstream” newspaper, lamebrainedly citing some rule about hacking.
Russia! The bogeyman!
In December 2020, Twitter’s former censorship head Yoel Roth explained in a sworn statement that for almost two years leading up to the leak, the FBI told him, over and over, to expect a Russian leak about Hunter Biden in October 2020:
During these weekly meetings [since 2018], the federal law enforcement agencies communicated that they expected “hack-and-leak operations” by state actors might occur in the period shortly before the 2020 presidential election, likely in October. I was told in these meetings that the intelligence community expected that individuals associated with political campaigns would be subject to hacking attacks and that material obtained through those hacking attacks would likely be disseminated over social media platforms, including Twitter… [and] that there were rumors that a hack-and-leak operation would involve Hunter Biden.
Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, made comments on a podcast suggesting he’d had similar conversations with the FBI.
In September 2020 — the month before the leak — Yoel Roth also participated in a swanky Aspen Institute “tabletop exercise” based on a potential “Hack-and-Dump” operation — relating to Hunter Biden! Coincidentally!
The Aspen exercise was organized and attended by people either in intelligence or formerly-in intelligence. The 4-fun-filled-days of “exercises” were designed to shape how media companies like Twitter would respond to a “national emergency” that was based on a
“disinformation attack” using “hacked materials.”
On October 14th, right after the New York Post published its Hunter Biden laptop story, and right before canceling the New York Post, Yoel Roth soberly admitted, “it isn’t clearly violative of our Hacked Materials Policy, nor is it clearly in violation of anything else,” but — tellingly — Roth added, “this feels a lot like a somewhat subtle leak operation.”
One of the FBI agents embedded at Twitter, was Twitter’s head lawyer Jim Baker, who previously worked for the FBI for 30 years, most recently as its Deputy General Counsel. Baker used his authority at Twitter to push for shutting down the Hunter Biden story:
Internal emails showed that Twitter executives were, in fact, misled by all this activity into falsely believing that the Hunter Biden story was a disinformation attack orchestrated by Russian hackers.
In one email dated in February, 2021, Jim Baker bragged that Twitter had collected $3.5 million dollars from the FBI since 2019 for “reimbursements for staff time.” In other words, it was the old carrot and stick again. The FBI was paying Twitter as well as pressuring it. Paying Twitter with our tax dollars. For safety.
One wonders, doesn’t one, how all these high tech companies that never made a profit have stayed afloat all this time. Maybe we should be looking hard at any company fitting that description. Who are these “investors?”
There were so many “former” FBI agents embedded at Twitter that they even had their own private internal chat channel and their own on-boarding procedures for new agents assigned to pretend to work at Twitter, sorry, I mean for new hires, of course.
It wasn’t just Twitter. Twitter may have been small potatoes, the tip of the iceberg. An independent researcher tweeted yesterday that he’d searched LinkedIn for profiles of people who worked at Facebook but used to work at the FBI, CIA, NSA, or other intelligence agencies. He found ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN of them, all now at Facebook.
That dwarfs the crowd at Twitter, and there might be more: this is just based on what’s available from LinkedIn.
Guess which department at Facebook employs the most former-intelligence staff? That’s right, the so-called “content moderation” group.
The inescapable conclusion of what we’re seeing from the Twitter Files is that our country’s intelligence agencies, by and through the F.B.I., now control all the large social media outlets (except Twitter and TikTok), and are using them to manipulate American public opinion and change the outcome of domestic elections.
But for whom?
It would be an understatement to call all this an historic development. If Elon Musk hadn’t spent $44 BILLION DOLLARS to buy Twitter, nobody would have ever believed the extent to which the intelligence community has absorbed private social media platforms in this country and turned them against the people. It’s literally unbelievable.
Exposure will probably be fatal. The Constitution does not provide for any internal security service in the United States. The agencies are WAY off the reservation, well into criminal territory, no matter how clever their lawyers are. You want an insurrection? Just consider how deep the intelligence agencies have penetrated social media platforms and how the suppression of the Hunter story probably affected the election.
Of course, we still have the teensy-weensy little problem of “who” will charge and arrest these people, since they’re in control of the entire federal law enforcement apparatus. Don’t worry, there ARE answers. But let’s wait a little bit and see how things play out.
I am starting to wonder whether all this is really a coincidence, or if something bigger is afoot.
“I am starting to wonder whether all this is really a coincidence, or if something bigger is afoot.” Like perhaps the Brunson Court case. It is important that this all comes out BEFORE the Supremes make their decision. Unlike right after the 2020 election where Robert’s was blackmailed into refusing to hear any of the lawsuits challenging the result and yelled about an insurection if they over turned it. Now that the people are finding out what the deep state has been doing, there will be an insurrection if they don’t remove Biden, Harris and all the Congress members who refused to even investigate the possibility of a rigged election!
“It is important that this all comes out BEFORE the Supremes make their decision.”
Could well be.
Because with all this information STREAMING out, who would anyone file their case with, DOJ? Leave it to States Attorneys? Unlikely.