Loading ...COFFEE AND COVID
Jeff Childers Substack is must read every morning 7 DAYS A WEEK
Each day I think…WOW…this one is the BEST ever
Well…I think so again…If you are NOT subscribed you are missing…EVERYTHING !
(The next item after this Covid piece this morning is even more Important if you have Real Estate)
IMO there is NOTHING more important than the continuing exposure of the fraud and crime that we call COVID.
So I will post the pertinent part of |Jeff’s piece today…but seriously please join and support this Guy
…………..
We’ve been watching the narrative over jab safety and efficacy pivoting for two months now, and then last week we saw the CDC pivoting to drop all its covid restrictions for unjabbed people, and announcing a “top to bottom” reorganization. Weird.
Within the last month, Tucker Carlson has rounded up jab injury studies
Tucker SAYS IT about the forced vaccines.
The Lancet: “Risk of infection, hospitalization, and death up to nine months after second dose of Covid-19 vaccine.” in 2.5 minutes
https://twitter.com/JustTruthSleuth/status/1550466208255750145?s=20&t=E1pu_m7HAyKwq2i07zQGlQ
Tucker’s first study was from the Lancet in February titled “Risk of infection, hospitalisation, and death up to 9 months after a second dose of COVID-19 vaccine: a retrospective, total population cohort study in Sweden – The Lancet”.
So it’s not that Tucker was breaking any new “news.” The real news was that Fox was giving prime-time coverage to direct vaccine injury studies. Tucker’s been warming up to this, I told you in July when he first referenced a study about the jab disrupting interferon signaling. But his tone in July was much more cautious than it was this weekend.
https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1551734762259234817?s=20&t=E1pu_m7HAyKwq2i07zQGlQ
Tucker is getting aggressive about jab risks. The CDC and its allies MUST realize that it’s simply too late to screw a cap onto all the studies — the cat’s already out of the bag, as Dr. McCullough keenly observed yesterday
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1561494836833820672?s=20&t=E1pu_m7HAyKwq2i07zQGlQ
He’s right — there are more than 30,000 papers and studies now published on the harms caused by spike protein, which is the mRNA shots’ one and only effective by-product. And many of those papers specifically examine jab-induced spike protein rather than just spike generally.
Now Tucker needs to do excess deaths. That’s the government’s weakness, the reality that they won’t be able to dissemble away.
? In another example, albeit not in corporate media, the Epoch Times ran a story Friday headlined, “New and Recurrent Cancers After mRNA Vaccines, Studies Suggest Immune Changes.”
The article starts with an alarming timeline for former cancer patient Bonnie Eisenberg. She recovered from breast cancer in 2012, and since then has been regularly testing for cancer markers every few months. They’ve always been low, averaging 0.4 ng/mL.
But after Bonnie took the first jab in January 2021, her next cancer marker test showed slightly elevated — but not alarming — levels at 3.7 ng/mL. After her second jab in February 2021, it bumped up again, to 5.2 ng/mL. But after she took the booster in October, her marker shot up to a red-hot 17.6 ng/mL and her doctor called her in for an immediate PET scan.
You guessed it; her breast cancer was back and not only that, it had already metastasized. Bonnie explained, “it went to all my bones … it didn’t go to any of my body organs, but it was over every bone you could think of. On the PET scan I lit up like a Christmas tree.”
She was suddenly and unexpectedly in stage 4. They immediately put her on chemo ($14,000 a month), which got the cancer under control. But Bonnie will remain on serious medication for the rest of her life, and is already experiencing side effects like hair loss, loss of bone mass, and so on.
Epoch quoted MIT’s Dr. Stephanie Seneff, who is apparently doing some great work in this area. Dr. Seneff explained in a recent study, “Impaired type I IFN signaling is linked to many disease risks, most notably cancer, as type 1 IFN signaling suppresses proliferation of both viruses and cancer cells by arresting the cell cycle.”
The paper then pointed out that “research on spike protein and mRNA vaccines suggests that IFN-alpha action may be impaired when exposed to spike protein.”
In other words, they’re saying the shots cause immune system problems, which pave the wave for cancer.
The immune system is what keeps cancer in check in healthy people. Epoch cited an analysis by The Expose on VAERS data that indicated a jab-linked explosion of cancers by 143,233 percent. That’s a lot.
The article cites more examples, like John Rolf, a healthy 68-year-old who suddenly developed stage 3 esophageal cancer after his jab in March 2021. Although doctors were optimistic, and started him on aggressive chemo, John died in his sleep in October. His wife Cheryl said, “I got up and he said ‘I want to sleep some more’ and he didn’t get up. I went and looked [later] and he had passed away.”
Is it possible we’ve finally reached the stage where the problems can no longer reasonably be hidden or denied, and that’s why the CDC is suddenly pivoting so hard, and why the U.S. is signaling that it will stop paying for jabs?
If so, it’s a fabulous development. We need a new Operation Warp Speed 2.0, to develop CURES for what the first Operation Warp Speed came up with. An all-hands-on-deck effort to treat vaccine injuries can’t happen until they admit there’s a problem.
Just admit it! Everybody already knows anyway.
“jab-linked explosion of cancers by 143,233 percent. That’s a lot.”
So if cancer rates were previously 1:10000 people
Its now 1432:10000 or 14% getting cancer
that not a lot, it is a nuclear explosion.