Goldtent TA Paradise

Allied Nevada – Hycroft addendum

1. Karl says:

   January 14, 2021 - 5:27 am at 5:27 am

   I received an email from a leader of a group of post-bankruptcy warrant holders asking that we post one of two messages wherever relevant, giving us the option of longer or shorter messages.  Here’s the shorter one:
    
   “Hey everyone, anyone here lost money in any stocks and looking for a way to get it back? I own HYMCZ warrants, and we are in the process of trying to get the attention of the SEC. I’m one of the original warrant holders but anyone can be a warrant holder. We have the potential to get back $47.87 per warrant. 1,000 warrants would get you back $47,870. They are cheap right now and we have two years until the warrants expire. Anyways, take a look at this article, it explains everything: https://seekingalpha.com/instablog/52535199-hymcz-warrant-holders/5542105-speculative-bet-of-century-hymcz
   Thanks so much and please keep an eye out on that updates page!
   https://bit.ly/HYMCZ-Warrants-Updates-Page
    
   With the link I am sure you too can be updated. I should probably not be undermining the message, but I personally think the chances of good things from the SEC are only moderately better than a call by the Speaker of the House for a revote using paper ballots with counting of presidential ballots in public to restore more harmonious feelings in the country.   

   I composed a lengthy essay on ANV that I will spare you for the most part.  One point was that I was stunned at how many financial and mining corporations of markedly varying reputations may have been involved in what to me might have seemed to be questionable activities involving ANV around its demise; that many shareholders came to the impression that occurrences that could seem quite odd or off to many everyday people might be routine in some Delaware bankruptcy courts and might be condoned on appeal up to the US Supreme Court. Also complaints by shareholders to this or that entities could seem receive the email version of almost something like contemptuous laughter in response. Also, the person originally filing suit in the bankruptcy court asserted including in at least one court filing that he had received death threats for challenging things.  The #1 message given by those who got their way was that one goes with the flow of whatever you call that which flows.

   I suppose the author of the piece I was sent is hoping, cynically, that one or more influential entities might buy vast quantities of the warrants (in which he is heavily invested), thus altering the direction of the flow.