Alexander Dugin
The US elections in November 2024 will answer the question of whether humanity has a chance or not. No more, no less.
https://ria.ru/20240619/vybory-1953676989.html
(translated) column in first comment
The US elections in November 2024 will answer the question of whether humanity has a chance or not. No more, no less.
https://ria.ru/20240619/vybory-1953676989.html
(translated) column in first comment
ALEXANDER DUGIN: AMERICAN ELECTIONS WILL DECIDE THE FATE OF THE WORLD
The upcoming presidential elections in the United States, which are scheduled to take place on November 5, 2024, have absolute significance. The fate of not only the United States and even the whole West, but also of all mankind, largely depends on their outcome. The world is teetering on the brink of a nuclear war, a full-fledged and total third world war between Russia and NATO countries, and in the end, humanity will exist or not depends on who will take over the White House for the next term.
That is why it is so important to take another look at the two candidates in these elections, to understand their platforms and positions.
Biden certainly represents today an imbecile invalid with obvious signs of senile dementia. But, strangely enough, it makes almost no difference. Biden is just a facade, a signboard for the political elites of the Democratic Party firmly in power in the United States, who have reached a firm consensus on Biden. In principle, Biden could rule over a dead body. It wouldn’t have changed anything. He has a close-knit group of globalists (sometimes called the “world government”) behind him, uniting not only most of the American deep state, but also liberal elites in Europe and at the global level.
Ideologically, Biden is globalism, that is, a project of uniting humanity under the rule of liberal technocratic elites with the abolition of sovereign nation—states and a complete mixture of peoples and faiths. This is a kind of project for the new Tower of Babel. Orthodox Christians and many Christian traditionalists of other faiths naturally see this as the “coming of the Antichrist.” Globalists (Yuval Harari, Klaus Schwab, Raymond Kurzweil, Maurice Strong) openly talk about the need to replace humanity with artificial intelligence and cyborgs, and the abolition of gender and ethnicity has already become a fact of Western societies. Personally, nothing depends on Biden in the implementation of this project at all. He does not make decisions, but only performs the role of an authorized representative of the international headquarters of world globalism.
Politically, Biden relies on the Democratic Party, which, with all the diversity of its positions and the presence of non—globalist poles and figures — such as the far-left Bernie Sanders or Robert Kennedy – has reached an internal agreement on his support. Moreover, Biden’s incapacity does not frighten anyone, since completely different personalities — younger and more rational ones – have real power. But that’s not the main point: Biden is backed by an ideology that is widespread in the world today. The majority of representatives of the world’s political and economic elites are liberals to one degree or another. Liberalism has penetrated deeply into education, science, culture, information, economics, business, politics and even technology at the global level. Biden is just the point of convergence of the rays of this world wide web. At the same time, its political embodiment was recorded in the face of the Democratic Party in the United States. Democrats in the United States care less and less about Americans themselves and more and more about maintaining their global dominance at any cost — even at the cost of a world war (with Russia and China). In a sense, they are ready to sacrifice the United States itself. This makes them extremely dangerous.
Representatives of American neoconservative circles also agree with the globalist agenda of those behind Biden. These are former Trotskyists who hate Russia and believe that a world revolution is possible only after the complete victory of capitalism, that is, the global West on a global scale. Therefore, they postponed this goal until the end of the cycle of capitalist globalization, hoping to return to the topic of the proletarian revolution later, after the global victory of the liberal West. The Neocons act like hawks, insist on a unipolar world, fully support Israel and, in particular, the genocide in Gaza. There are also Neocons among Democrats, but most of them are concentrated among Republicans, where they represent the opposite pole to Trump. In a sense, this is the fifth column of Democrats and the Biden group in the Republican Party.
And finally, the American deep state, the Deep State. Here we are talking about the non-partisan top government officials, top bureaucrats and key figures in the army and special services, who embody a kind of “guardians” of American statehood. Traditionally, there were two vectors for the American Deep State, embodied precisely in the traditional politics of Democrats and Republicans. One vector is aimed at global domination and the spread of liberalism on a planetary scale (the policy of the Democrats), and the other is aimed at strengthening the United States as a great superpower as the hegemon of world politics (the policy of the Republicans). It is easy to see that these are not mutually exclusive lines, but both vectors are directed towards the same goal with different nuances. Therefore, the American deep state is the guardian of the general direction, allowing the balance of parties to choose one of the development vectors each time, both of which are fundamentally satisfied with the Deep State.
At the moment, Biden’s grouping more accurately reflects the interests and values of this top American bureaucracy.
Biden concentrates a critically important number of power factors — from ideology to the Deep State, and in addition, relies on the support of large financial corporations, the world press and control over global monopolies. His personal weakness and senile dementia force the globalists behind him to force undemocratic methods of keeping him in power. In one of his recent speeches at a campaign rally, Biden bluntly stated that “it’s time to put freedom over democracy.” This was not another slip of the tongue, but the globalists’ plan. If it is not possible to retain power by democratic methods, any undemocratic processes can occur under the slogan of “freedom”, that is, in fact, the establishment of a globalist dictatorship. The war with Russia will give legal grounds for this, and Biden can repeat the trick of Zelensky, who remained in power after the cancellation of the elections. The same can be chosen by Macron in France, who suffered a crushing defeat from the right in the European Parliament elections, and even Scholz, who is rapidly losing support in Germany. Globalists in the West are clearly considering the scenario of establishing a direct dictatorship and abolishing democracy.
For humanity, a Biden victory or just the fact that he remains in power in any capacity will be a disaster. Globalists will continue to build a New Babylon, cling to the world government, and this is fraught with an escalation of existing conflicts and the beginning of new ones. Biden is a war. Without end.
There are completely different forces behind Donald Trump. This is indeed an alternative to Biden and his grouping of globalists, and a much more contrasting one. Therefore, Trump’s first presidential term was a continuous scandal. The American establishment categorically refused to accept him and did not calm down until they replaced him with Biden.
Trump, unlike Biden, is a bright, original, impulsive and strong—willed personality. Individually, despite his age, he is in good shape, passionate, energetic and cheerful. Moreover, if Biden is a team man, and in fact a protege of globalist circles, then Trump is a loner, the embodiment of the American dream of personal success. He is a narcissist and an egoist, but a very skillful and successful politician.
Ideologically, Trump relies on classic American conservatives (not Neocons!). They are often called paleoconservatives. They are heirs to the traditional Republican isolationist tradition, as expressed in Trump’s slogan “America First!”. These classical conservatives defend just traditional values: a normal family of men and women, the Christian faith, the preservation of decency and norms familiar to American culture.
The ideology of paleoconservatives in foreign policy boils down to strengthening the United States as a sovereign nation-state (hence another slogan of Trump’s “Make America Great Again”) and to refusing to interfere in the politics of other countries when it does not pose a direct threat to the security and interests of the United States.
In other words, Trump’s ideological platform is completely opposite to Biden’s ideological platform. Today, this ideology is most often associated with Trump himself and is defined as “Trumpism”.
It is worth noting that from an electoral and sociological point of view, almost the majority of Americans share this ideology — especially in the central states between the strips of both coasts. The average American is conservative and traditional, although the culture of individualism makes him indifferent to what others, including the authorities, think. Self-reliance makes traditional Americans skeptical of the federal government, which by definition only restricts their freedoms. It was a direct appeal to this ordinary American — over the heads of political, financial and media elites — that allowed Trump to be elected president in 2016.
Since there are not only paleoconservatives among Republicans, but also neoconservatives, the Republican Party is largely split. The Neocons are closer to Biden and the forces behind him, and Trump’s ideology goes against their principles. The only thing that brings them together is the declaration of America’s greatness and the desire to strengthen its power in the field of military, strategic and economic. Moreover, during the decades of their new policy in the United States, the former Trotskyists managed to create influential and high-profile think tanks, as well as infiltrate existing ones with their representatives. Paleoconservatives have almost no serious thought factories left.
Buchanan complained in the 90s that the Neocons had simply hijacked the Republican Party, pushing traditional politicians to the periphery. This is a mine planted under Trump.
But on the other hand, for Republicans, elections are of great importance and many major politicians from among them — congressmen, senators and governors — take into account Trump’s enormous popularity with the electorate and are forced to support him even for pragmatic reasons. This explains Trump’s critical weight among Republican presidential candidates. For Republicans — not only paleoconservatives, but also simple pragmatists — Trump is the key to power.
However, the Neocons will remain an extremely influential group, which Trump is unlikely to risk breaking with.
The attitude towards Trump from the Deep State was quite cool from the very beginning. In the eyes of the top bureaucracy, Trump looked like an upstart and even a marginal, relying on popular and traditional for Americans, but still somewhat dangerous ideas. In addition, he did not have enough support in the establishment. Hence the conflict with the CIA and other services that began from the first days of Trump’s presidency in 2017.
The Deep state is clearly not on Trump’s side, but at the same time they cannot ignore his popularity among the population and the fact that strengthening the United States as a state does not in principle contradict the fundamental interests of the representatives of the Deep State themselves. If desired, Trump could create an impressive support group for himself in this environment, but his political temperament is not suitable for this. He prefers to act spontaneously and impulsively, relying on his own strength. This is what he bribes the voter, who sees in him a culturally familiar American archetype.
If Trump, no matter what, manages to win the presidential election in 2024, relations with the Deep State will certainly change. Realizing the non-randomness of his figure, Deep State will obviously try to establish a systemic relationship with him.
Most likely, the globalists behind the weak Biden will try to remove the strong Trump from the election and prevent him from becoming president at any cost. All methods can be used here: murder, imprisonment, organization of riots and protest actions, up to a coup or a civil war. Or at the end of his term, Biden will unleash World War III. This is also very likely.
Since the globalists have strong support from the Deep State, any of these scenarios can be involved.
However, if we assume that the popular and populist Trump wins and becomes president, then this, of course, will most seriously affect the entire world politics.
First of all, the second term of the US president with such an ideology will show that the first term was a pattern, and not an “annoying” (for globalists) accident. The unipolar world and the globalist project will be rejected not only by the supporters of a multipolar world — Russia, China, Islamic countries, but also by the Americans themselves. This will deal a powerful blow to the entire network of the liberal-globalist elite. And most likely, they will not recover from such a blow.
Objectively, Trump will be able to trigger a multipolar world order in which the United States will take an important, but not a dominant role. “America will be great again,” but as a nation-state, not as a globalist world hegemon.
At the same time, of course, the conflicts that automatically exist today and unleashed by the globalists will not stop by themselves. Trump’s demands on Russia regarding the end of the war in Ukraine will be realistic, but generally quite tough. His support for Israel in Gaza will be no less unconditional than in Biden’s case. Moreover, Trump sees Netanyahu’s right-wing politics as a kindred type. And he will pursue a rather tough policy towards China, especially in putting pressure on Chinese businesses in the United States.
The main difference between Trump and Biden is that the former will focus on rationally calculated American national interests (which corresponds to realism in international relations) and do so with a pragmatic consideration of the balance of forces and resources. Whereas the ideology of the globalists behind Biden is in a certain sense totalitarian and uncompromising.
For Trump, a nuclear apocalypse is an unacceptable price to pay for anything. For Biden and, most importantly, for those who imagine themselves to be the rulers of the New Babylon, everything is at stake. And their behavior, even in a critical situation, is unpredictable.
Whereas Trump is just a player. Very tough and audacious, but restrained by rationality and estimates of specific benefits. Trump can hardly be persuaded, but you can bargain with him. Biden and his hosts are insane.
The US elections in November 2024 will answer the question of whether humanity has a chance or not. No more, no less.
Original Source to be added when I get it.
THIS IS AMAZING
THIS GUY…A RUSSIAN…GETS IT….COMPLETELY…
WOW