Loading ...Video emphasizes importance of case against Ottawa constable for investigating COVID jab’s risks
‘Freedom fighter/advocate for the ‘little guy’ Dave Freedom contends in his documentary that veteran officer Helen Grus’ disciplinary hearing ‘is one of the most important cases in Canadian history, as it will define how police investigate crimes.’
Grus, a 20-year Ottawa Police Service veteran and mother of three, has been in an ongoing disciplinary hearing after being hit with misconduct charges for allegedly looking into the deaths of nine infants between June 2020 and January 2022.
Grus has stated that her investigations were legitimate police work, and according to her lawyer, Bath-Sheba van den Berg, she had a “a hunch, not a mere hunch,” about the links between the COVID jabs and infant deaths. Freedom stated in the video that “Helen faces the bogus charge of discreditable conduct for simply doing her job as an Ottawa police detective.”
Regarding Grus trial, video alleges ‘the fix is in’ — ED: read this part — it’s interesting what the ONTARIO CANADA police commission is doing to sway the result of this hearing to penalize Grus………
Kudos to this detective. She is one of the many heroes in this sorry story! We should never forget the pathetic performance of most police officers, who were as complicit as doctors in the gross abridgement of our rights, and their responsibilities. Fuck ’em! Here’s to you, Helen Grus! Your three children have an amazing mother, and what could be better than that!
ABSOLUTELY….AND HEAR HERE !
this is one of the comments we should know:
I know that I am wasting my time here but perhaps, just perhaps , someone with some influence will learn the REAL law and use it.
Firstly, note the word constable. Police officers are not the same as constables although the roles may be combined in one man or woman. Constables have a sworn duty to uphold the law. Police officers are agents of the corporate state. It generally makes little difference but it matters with regard to investigation of crime. A constable has a common law sworn duty to investigate crime. Note the words common law. Most people do not understand what common law is. They think law is what parliament dictates. Parliament law is statute or legal law. Statute law is inferior to common law. Common law gives you freedom of speech and freedom to travel. These can only be taken away from you if you if you consent. Most people do not challenge the state if they are prosecuted for hate crimes etc because they believe that the state can make laws taking away their freedoms. Most people includes lawyers because they have a first sworn duty to the state who control the courts. As regards the duty of a constable to investigate crime; the common law duty of constables to investigate crime was written in the years of the 1500s by Henri de Bracton. That law is common law and does not allow constables o ignore crime. Henri de Bracton stated that a constable’s sworn duty is to record and investigate crime. I doubt if anyone will learn and realise the importance of following and using the common law because people today are mind programmed to accept that the state can tell them what to do. They do not understand that the people are sovereign not parliament. The lower courts side with parliament. The Supreme court has to follow precedent. Wake up people and use the real law.