Also posted two days ago – take this post down if need be – it is very important though.  Thanks FGC.

IF you can’t access see X link below for excerpt.


PV with other excerpts

Some background

Notably, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) changed the definition of “vaccine” in 2021 to include the experimental mRNA jabs.  Vaccines used to be defined as “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.” But the CDC modified it to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

In other words, the mRNA injection did not stimulate immunity to COVID-19, so the CDC had to change the definition of vaccine instead.

Since the court ruled the COVID-19 jabs don’t fit the traditional definition of a vaccine, it raises questions about whether pharmaceutical companies who manufactured the jabs are now vulnerable to legal action.  “The 9th Circuit Just Stripped mRNA Shots of Legal Liability Protection,”

Dr. Jane Ruby wrote on X. “The 9th Circuit said it’s not a vaccine if the claim isn’t PREVENT THE SPREAD. COVID shots were claimed to ‘reduce symptoms’ and prevent hospitalization…Those claims make it a TREATMENT.”