Kategate ?

From Jeff Childers

The UK Telegraph took the opportunity of yesterday’s Royal Cluster story to cook up a narrative cover for rising cancer rates, by running this astonishing headline:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/23/doctors-warn-abdominal-cancer-epidemic-princess-diagnosis/?

Don’t lose track of that sub-headline: more and more, fit, young people are getting cancer. Setting aside the ethical and civilizations aims of protecting our young folks, this trend could become a demographic atom bomb if it continues. You’d think the young cancer crisis would constitute the CDC’s biggest concern, but CDC researchers remain committed to diving into promiscuous gay mens’ nether orifices looking for monkeypox.

This Telegraph story is part of a recent series of similar ‘surging cancer’ stories that have been trickling out of corporate media, tantalizing us with the headline, but then packing the articles with useless tidbits to distract readers from ever thinking the magic vaccines could be involved or wondering, what changed that’s causing all this cancer?

I’m sick of playing pretend, and we’re shutting it down today.

Like Coca-Cola, corporate media keeps a secret recipe for baking all these narrative-framing cancer articles, a recipe for grudgingly recognizing the recent drastic increase in turbo cancers in young people . But today I’m going to give away their secret recipe. My hope is no one will ever again be tricked into consuming any more of these empty mental calories, not least because they’re packed with unhealthy high-fructose corn syrup and six different kinds of GMO seed oils.

Once baked, the media’s final journalistic product is a hallucinogenic compound causing people to forget that for their entire lives — until 2021 — all these weird turbo cancers were strictly diseases of old age. Whenever a young person used to get cancer it was practically a national tragedy, and lawyers would eagerly call the victims to find out if they’d been climbing through asbestos at their jobs or something. (Nowadays I suspect the reason only old people used to get those cancers is because of prolonged exposure to something in their environment.)

If you eat off the media’s narrative-formula cancer cake, you’ll get amnesia and forget all about cancer in the old days. The name of the media’s narrative formula is “strategic ambiguity.” (Actually, the real name includes a crass reference to male bovine excrement: ‘strategic b——.’ But that name was cleaned up since this is a family blog, and since cow farts cause climate change. Allegedly.)

Ready? Here it is; here is the media’s secret journalistic formula for manufacturing misleading strategic ambiguity to fog the skyrocketing numbers of young cancer diagnoses:

First, whip ten egg whites into empty fluff and carefully fold in a brief, drive-by citation to some barely relevant, antique study showing a long-term increase in cancer over an extended period of time except — and this is the important part — the study must end no later than 2019:

For added zest, don’t link the study, don’t give its name, don’t say what journal it appeared in, and don’t otherwise identify it so people can check for themselves. For best effect, generically call it “one study.”

Second, prepare your first bowl by adding two cups of CURRENT quotes from doctors who are NOW reporting alarming increases in cancer — but be very careful not to reveal exactly when cases started spiking. Let the reader interpret it any way they want:

Third, grease a second bowl of drivel with bafflement. Make readers more confused about the cause of the cancer than were the poor, bewildered Babylonians after God confused their languages and they were all trying to ask each other what exactly happened last night after the Tower party. To enjoy a spicier version, sprinkle into the mixture some sideways references to good-old Darwin and point the finger at rapid-onset genetics:

Then mix the two bowls together, combining the amorphous admission of ballooning cancer rates bowl with the bowl of bafflement, to reinforce the almost-baked narrative that it’s just a mystery and it always will be:

Finally, bake the result at 350 degrees for six seconds to create a hot mess. After you remove your strategically ambiguous narrative cake from the oven and allow it to cool, apply some vanilla icing of useless advice:

Now the strategically ambiguous narrative cancer cake can be served to unsuspecting news consumers. They’ll eat up the mystifying, amnesia-inducing pastry and ask for a cup of malarkey to wash it down.

But now, you won’t eat it, because now you know how the lying media’s cock-and-bull cancer cake was baked.

…………

NOW THAT THIS SHIT IS GETTING REAL AND I AM SURE THAT EACH OF US HAS REAL LIFE CANCER DRAMAS GOING ON IN OUR CIRCLES…KEEP IN MIND ALL THE RESEARCH AND POSITIVE RESULTS SCIENTISTS AND DOCTORS ARE GETTING WITH REGARDS TO IVERMECTIN AND ANOTHER MORE OBSCURE NATURAL REMEDY ( IN PILL FORM) FENBENDAZOLE

SEE 2ND SMARTEST GUY ON THE PLANET’S SUBSTACK FOR MORE ON THIS …THERE ARE LINKS ON THE SIDEBAR TOO

DYODD…BIG PHARM AND THEIR “CHEMOTHERAPY” SOLUTION IS GETTING OLD NOW…THEY LITERALLY POISON YOU AND MAKE YOU FEEL 1000 TIMES WORSE AND TELL YOU IF YOU DONT GO ALONG YOU WILL BE SORRY !

IF THEY CAN PATHOLOGICALLY LIE ABOUT COVID AND COVID VAXX AND REMDISIVIR AND OZEMPIC AND THALIDAMIDE AND OPIODS AND STATINS…IS THERE A TINY CHANCE THEY COULD BE LYING ABOUT CHEMOTHERAPY VS IVERMECTIN + ?

SHEESH TO THE NTH DEGREE

…………..

PS

Jeff Childers is THE Bomb !

This guy stands out above and beyond all the Brilliant and Brave Analysts and researchers that we are blessed to have in our “Corner” of this fascinating and terrifying journey we have “chosen” to embark on.

His substack is free every day except Sunday

You’re welcome