Loading ...On The Record, The World Health Organization Will Attempt To End National Constitutions
The End Of Sovereignty. The End Of Freedom. “It’s For Your Health”
“WHO is going to establish a classical totalitarian structure and wants to make sure that the value of the national constitutions become 0. And if you analyze well these international health regulations, you will find 5 elements that show that very clear.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1748865353911038065
6 minutes
1st comment
https://twitter.com/WallStreetApes/status/1748865353911038065
On The Record, The World Health Organization Will Attempt To End National Constitutions
The End Of Sovereignty. The End Of Freedom. “It’s For Your Health”
“WHO is going to establish a classical totalitarian structure and wants to make sure that the value of the national constitutions become 0. And if you analyze well these international health regulations, you will find 5 elements that show that very clear.
Number 1, there’s a mechanism of self empowerment that already exists today, but which will be enlarged to a horrible extent. It will be even more simple than until today for one person, the general director, to declare a public health emergency of international concern. There, I’ll spare you with the details, but he can simply just, um, say the word into the microphone.
2nd element, all what WHO will publish under the title of recommendations will become mandatory. I gladly state this proposal to any media to prove that there are still today many officials who say the opposite, to say, no, this will just be recommendations not mandatory. That’s not true. They will become mandatory.
Number 3, fundamental rights with such a regime where you have one person declaring emergency law, having all the power to make recommendations that are legally binding, you don’t have to even discuss about human fundamental rights. And whether they are now still crossed out in Article 3 or whether they might put it back into, it will not change the result, there will be no effective protection on the country level for fundamental human rights.
Number 4 is specifically frightening because as human beings and trying to pursue the ideals of the enlightenment, um, as very well explained by Matthias Desmond, we depend on the right information. Now in both of these instruments, in the new Pandemic Treaty and in the amended health regulations, we have both provisions that clearly, say, WHO shall be the only sole institution on the planet that will be allowed to define what is the truth in health matters, including, um, censorship.
And the 5th point is that there’s no mechanism of correction, there’s no mechanism of control vis a vis WHO that could correct any wrong recommendation or a wrongly declared public health emergency of international concern? No.
They can just go on forever and forever. And all of this, of course, we know it is done in the interest, not of our health, but in the interest of those sponsors who define the true strategy behind it. Now, it doesn’t take study of law to come to the conclusion that this will heavily affect and reduce this ordinary structure of our constitutions, actually, to a minimum, there will be no uh, separations of powers, there’ll be no checks and balances. This principle of the rule of law will be as abolished and replaced by the rule of emergencies, and most notably, there will be no uh, human rights. Now this is something this is so powerful, and we have seen that this message has not come across to the public.
And there has literally non debate taking place in any parliament with very few exceptions, and I shall mention one exception, um, is Andrew Bridgen, member of British parliament, who rightfully persisted and insisted in bringing this topic to the floor of the house in the British parliament, and he succeeded. And I’m honored that he is here with us today, Andrew Brechin. And so does also Gerhard Hauser. He did the same. He made the case in the Austrian parliament that WHO’s power structure should be made a topic of discussion.“
– Phillipp Kruse
This continues on but I can’t transcribe it all due to X’s text limits.
SO….if the WHO Pandemic Treaty is confirmed in May (Canada is one of the proponents) than National Sovereignty over “Health” ends immediately and the WHO can declare anything they want for world implementation with all recommendations being mandatory and no appeal or opt out options.
Is this NOT the exact same thing as the success of the globalists in assuming control of the world and imposing one-world government?
For example — WHO could say that “X – pick something/anything – is a pandemic” and mandate that the cure is for all world governments to resign and be replaced by an elite oligarchy. There is NO appeal and NO opt-outs so whatever they say MUST be implemented as specified. (Am sure someone else can think of a better example but also sure you understand my drift).
This IS the globalist “coup d’etait” being executed most likely by WEF Young Leaders worldwide.
Canada is licking the boots of Schwab et al and will likely be first in line with vaseline to ensure the elite are properly entertained!
https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/eu-affairs/tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus-is-the-who-led-by-a-terrorist-the-go-between-of-gates-and-china-engaged-in-the-global-leadership-battle/
And close to half of all Americans will approve.
The ones who have learned nothing and never will.
And the WHO will declare something this upcoming fall.
And those restrictions will be enforced.
Like, no voting in person.
They are prepping for it … step by step, inch by inch
https://www.healnc.net/blogs/post/nc-poised-to-mandate-masks-and-social-distancing-on-workers