Destruction of San Francisco – Is No Accident
Many are shocked and dismayed how the once beautiful city of San Francisco has been destroyed by numerous progressive policies. Yes, liberal political policies always have unintended consequences, but what if many of them, were actually intended. From the Soros chosen D/A to allow unpunished crimes, the rampant drug abuse, homelessness, shop lifting etc. While such woke policies have caused havoc in many cities across America, I believe they were especially harnassed in San Franciso to further another agenda. Just like in Maui where Lahaina was purposely destroyed under the guise of a fire, because of plans and law changes preparing for a modern digital city, San Francisco was destroyed to drive investors, businesses and future residents to the new city being built just east in Solano County. The mysterious large land purchases from multiple farmers around at least two military bases is for a planned new digital city there, as well. How better to accelerate a rush for investors and future residents than to eliminate the nearby competition.
Interesting and viable theory CM
Agreed, it’s ALL ABOUT INTENT.
Reminds me of a similar tactic used in the ‘reporting’ of the final Napoleonic war results to unsuspecting investors.
Cover a gem (SF) with shit, and when no one wants to buy the shit and the value plummets, buy it at a firesale price and install a new regime get rid of the shit – voila !!
Also regarding Intent – think about Insurance companies – how vocal were they (to law enforcement or gov’t officials) about allowing insured property getting destroyed in the 2021-22 riots (crickets), now what are they doing to homeowners? Absolutely not accidental.
Appreciate the post CM!
And in all that intentional destruction, the state’s coffers have been wiped out to the extent of a $6b billion annual deficit!
My home insurance premium is up 65% !!! WTF !!!
GL
Correction: $68 billion