Jeff Childers Explains…and note this story was in the Toronto Sun ( MSM but Conservative leaning)

The Toronto Sun ran a shockingly candid article last month that will not surprise you one bit — except, that is, for the fact they actually ran the story — headlined “Privy Council Advocated Downplaying Covid Vaccine Injuries Or Deaths.”

Here’s the screen-grab to prove it actually happened:

The article explained a May 2021 internal Department of Health memo, issued just weeks after the jab rollouts, and previously marked confidential, was obtained by diligent reporters through public records requests. The memo’s Orwellian title was: “Testing Behaviourally-Informed Messaging In Response To Severe Adverse Events Following Immunization.”

To help you out, I translated the memo’s incomprehensible title from bureaucratese. In the Queen’s English, the memo’s title actually says: “How to Manipulate the Public Into Overlooking Covid Jab Injuries.”

In other words, they relied more on the “science” of psychology than on the science of vaccinology.

The official Department of Health memo began by observing that “News reports of adverse events following immunization and the government’s response to them have strong potential to influence public confidence in vaccines and their safety.” You don’t say. It then darkly suggested that officials skew the statistics, to downplay the impact of jab deaths or injuries, helpfully suggesting tactics like saying the “chance of it happening to me is one in a million” instead of “it has happened five times.”

Meanwhile, government officials were doing the exact opposite with their covid death messaging, reporting the absolute and inflated covid death numbers without ever mentioning the relative risk of dying from covid. See how it works?

One important, unanswered question is: how and why did the public officials expect the media to trot right along behind whatever nudgy psyops they came up with? Either way, the memo evidences just how well public officials understood that the jabs were injuring and killing people, and the risk that people might find out. They knew perfectly well. But, for “science,” they deliberately concealed that critical information from the public using statistical trickery, while simultaneously smothering the airwaves with the now-discredited shibboleth of “safe and effective.”

Canada was certainly not alone in its well-planned charade to make the deadly jabs look safe. In fact, it was a worldwide phenomenon. The newly-disclosed memo adds one more brick to the accountability structure.