Of ALL the insanity unleashed by the Gender Bender Retards the defense of any man who says he is a woman to play a womans sport is the most disgustig . Jeff Childers has the goods .

………………

The debate over the insulting nature of the terms “cis” and “cisgender” continued building steam yesterday on Twitter. One good example was Harry Potter author and well-known feminist JK Rowling, who chimed in, calling the theory of gender identity an “unprovable essence”:

That’s a neat way of putting it. Let’s see if it fits in anywhere else in today’s roundup; I’m thinking it will.

? Swimming champion, former trans-napping victim, heroine, and outspoken biological-women’s rights advocate Riley Gaines testified in Congress yesterday about women’s sports. After the pro-trans witness claimed that no man has ever beaten Serena Williams in tennis,” Ms. Gaines promptly corrected the record.

It was extremely satisfying when Riley spoke up and testified, “Both Serena and Venus lost to the 203rd ranked male tennis player.” She also said that her husband, who was not a champion but swam in college, could still beat her any day of the week.

There was another electric moment when Senator Kennedy asked the democrats’ witness, Kelly Robinson, to explain why we have women’s sports at all, if men and women are NOT biologically different? Why not just have unisex sports?

It’s a question we’ve all hoped to hear an answer for. And the anticipation was momentarily excruciating.

But it was ultimately disappointing. The trans advocate’s answer was, as you would predict, completely unsatisfying word salad. First, Ms. Robinson refused to simply agree or deny that any biological differences exist between men and women. Instead she just kept spouting marxist, pseudo-intellectual claptrap about social constructs of gender being distinct from biological sex.

Curiously, Ms. Robinson’s answer reminded us of Ms. Rowlings’ Twitter comment. Sex — biological sex — is easily provable. If in doubt, just check the undercarriage equipment. But GENDER, as Rowling points out, is a completely “unprovable essence.” It’s a meaningless phantom, a ghost of an idea. ‘Gender’ is a perfectly subjective concept that means whatever anyone thinks it means.

“What is a woman?” Nobody knows for sure! They circuitously answer, “a woman is a person who identifies as a woman.” And as Matt Walsh has asked until his vocal cords gave out, “yes, but what is THAT?”

Robinson ultimately told Senator Kennedy the reason for women’s sports was because women’s sports were “important.” Left unanswered was, WHY are women’s sports important? Especially if men can be women whenever they feel the perverted inclination to don a dress and ladies’ undergarments?

If it weren’t for circular reasoning, I’d suspect these trans advocates don’t use any reasoning at all.

MORE About Riley Gaines and the Williams Sisters debacle here

https://pjmedia.com/columns/stephen-kruiser/2023/06/22/the-morning-briefing-riley-gaines-is-the-hero-sane-america-needs-this-pride-month-n1705300

click to enlarge