Goldtent TA Paradise

Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory — a synopsis

1. pedro_deleon says:

   May 30, 2023 - 3:20 pm at 3:20 pm

   Hi B****,

   I’m glad you’re putting this out there for discussion.

   I think the third point…”Why should I care? How does that pertain to today? It doesn’t change a thing” is the easiest one to refute. Because, if there is no virus that has ever been proven to cause disease, it literally changes EVERYTHING. As long as we believe that invisible particles that we can neither see, hear, taste, smell, or touch (much like the demons of yore) are out there to get us through contact with our fellow humans, we are locked into an adversarial relationship with both nature and each other.

   As long as we believe viruses cause disease, we are attached on some level to the massive fear porn being cranked out about it, still. But once you know it is a lie, you are free from it…completely free. And that has massive impact on the choices you make.

   I think the reason most people don’t understand this, is because it is not a simple concept. That’s the beauty of germ theory…it’s easy and does not take a lot of thought. A (Germ) + B (You, in a vulnerable moment) = C (Disease). But with the alternative framework, I would not say that it is as simple as “there are no viruses.” I don’t think most are framing it that way, but rather as “there are no viruses that have been conclusively proven via genuine scientific method to cause disease.”

   There are particles that could be identified as viruses. But that’s where the cellular pleomorphism theory of Bechamp, the brilliant, genuine scientist credited with terrain theory who Pasteur at first plagiarized, and when he was caught at that, decided to spin off germ theory to discredit Bechamp. Back by the big money and pharmaceutical companies of the era who knew a cash cow when they saw it, Pasteur’s demented version won the day. His family hid his notes for many years after he died, until one brave family member decided to publish them and expose his ancestor for the fraud that he was. His notes reveal a demented mind torturing animals and proving absolutely nothing. But I digress.

   Anyway, the theory of pleomorphism says our own cells are able to, and often do, mutate to address the conditions of terrain within the body. They can mutate to the form of viruses, or bacteria, or even, when the terrain is very severely compromised, to fungal cells whose function it is to destroy what seems to be dying or unhealthy cells. This is in response to the many, many ways in which we poison ourselves and are poisoned…vaccines with mercury, aluminum, and God knows what; sky high EMF levels that create inflammation and impair the nervous system, the mitochondria, and the voltage gated calcium channels in every cell; highly processed and unhealthy food; pharmaceutical “medicines;” and even intense emotional trauma that causes real physical damage. With all of this and more, we truly do not even need viruses to account for disease.

   From what I understand, the key factors as to why virology is pseudoscience is because they never do controls for their experiments. How is that even remotely acceptable? And, when they say they have isolated a virus and shown it to cause disease, if you actually read their methods, in every case they have done some version of: extract fluid from a sick person or animal, do some kind of process to isolate the virus (or not!), put what you got into a cell culture with monkey kidney cells, add some fetal bovine serum, add some antibiotics (often the kind that are known to kill kidney cells!), starve the whole culture by not giving it proper nutrients, maybe subject it to extreme heat. And then when the poor cells in the whole hot mess die, say “Voila, cell death! That shows it’s a virus, alright!” And again, they never do a control cultivation with all the same processes minus the “virus.”

   Not only that, but, if you really think about…this whole bizarre virus “proving” process is being done outside the human body, away from all the realities of how a living human body functions, repairs itself, cleanses toxins, etc. What does that really prove? Oh, and to top off the process above, to get a slide with their virus trophy, they often use some kind of toxic dye. The final product is dead, dead, dead. They do not look at living blood. The only way to do that is with dark field microscopy, which is almost never done.

   One of my personal litmus tests for truth in the era we now live in is how heavily it is censored. Dr. David Martin gives a presentation in the European Parliament full of virus fear porn and suddenly it is everywhere. He has a major platform and is not censored. Compare that to Drs. Mark and Samantha Bailey from New Zealand, who are heavily censored on every platform. Speaking of which, if anyone wants to do a deep dive into a very well thought out and evidence-based look at the lies of virology, I cannot recommend Dr. Mark Bailey’s “Farewell to Virology” article highly enough. Check it out here: https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/

   Sure, it’s 67 pages…but if it holds the potential of gaining mental freedom from Big Pharma’s lies, isn’t it worth it? Another very important book in this field is Virus Mania, the most recent version that includes a few chapters on COVID. Reading this book was a game changer for me, because it looks at so-called “epidemics” for the last few decades, and shows that every single one of them uses the same playbook: identify a virus through junk science, take a set of symptoms and define them as a disease, major marketing push through the media to get everybody terrified about it, come out with highly toxic “medications” or quackzenes that cause the same symptoms they are supposed to cure, when people start getting sick from those claim the epidemic is getting even worse, rinse and repeat.

   Speaking of censored, there is also Karen Kingston, who is very highly censored. Her work sheds light on what is really going on in virology labs and it is far from natural viruses as AI is from my brain. But that’s a topic for another post.

   Denise

2. Farmer says:

   May 30, 2023 - 3:50 pm at 3:50 pm

   Yes, agree. Virus theory is pure utter bunkum and pillow fluff. The sooner we get over it the sooner we get free of the agenda.

3. Peter47 says:

   May 30, 2023 - 7:56 pm at 7:56 pm

   the book that got me on this theory is was researched for I believe 10 years
   before they published it:

   What really makes you ill

   “C:\Users\pivan\OneDrive\What Really Makes You Ill Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong by Dawn Lester, David Parker.pdf”

4. Fullgoldcrown says:

   May 30, 2023 - 9:25 pm at 9:25 pm

   Yes I am comming round to believe this virus shit and “Virology” is the Original Pharma Scam !!

   To sell vaccines and be able to poison populations at will

   Evil to the nth degree