How can it be controversial to say that children have a right to care by their biological father and mother?

MP Danny Kruger, who told the audience that “that the normative family – held together by marriage, by mother and father sticking together for the sake of the children and the sake of their own parents and for the sake of themselves – this is the only possible basis for a safe and successful society.” He went on: “Marriage is not all about you. It’s not just a private arrangement. It’s a public act, by which you undertake to live for someone else, and for wider society; and wider society should recognize and reward this undertaking.”

These have been boilerplate political talking points for decades, if not centuries. Andrew Boff, the Conservative chair of the London assembly, who told the BBC that the parliamentarian’s praise of the natural family was “reminiscent of some of the diatribes that Putin comes out with” and insisted that Kruger “does not speak for the average Conservative,” which may well be correct now that the term is functionally meaningless.

BBC was pleased to announce that “Rishi Sunak does not agree with a Conservative MP’s claim about the role of conventional family values in society, his spokesman has said.”

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/uk-conservatives-denounce-one-of-their-own-mps-for-defending-the-nuclear-family/?