Loading ...When The Law Didn’t Say What They Wanted, The Liberal Government INVENTED A New Justification For Invoking Emergencies Act Based On Their ‘Feelings’
Trudeau’s national security advisor Jody Thomas admitted that the Emergencies Act requirement of a “threat to the security of Canada” – which is defined by CSIS and is required to rightfully invoke the act – should be “reconsidered.”
Further, she said the government knew that CSIS did not believe the protest met the definition of a nation emergency. But instead of accepting that – which should have taken the Emergencies Act off the table since the threshold for invoking it was not met under the law – they decided to make up a new definition based on how they ‘felt’ about it:
“In NSIA Thomas’ view, it was the totality of the circumstances that led to what she considered to be the existence of a threat to the security of Canada, and therefore, [a] public order emergency.”
This stunning.
So the map says turn right to get to your destination.
But instead you turned left because you “felt” that is correct decision.
End result: Lost