Loading ...Jabbed? You will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity.
Straight from the Government
The British government has spilled the beans about that fact that once you get double jabbed, you will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity.
In its Week 42 “COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report,” the U.K. Health Security Agency admitted on page 23 that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” It goes on to explain that this antibody drop is basically permanent.
What’s this mean?
We know the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission of the virus (in fact, the report shows elsewhere that vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated).
What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.
In the long term, people who take the vaccine will be far more vulnerable to any mutations in the spike protein that might come along, even if they have already been infected and recovered once, or more than once.
The unvaccinated, meanwhile, will procure lasting, if not permanent, immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being infected with it naturally even just once.
Read it for yourself.. Page 24.
PK …is this YOUR summary or was it written by a third party. If so who ?
I can’t really make heads or tails of this regarding antibody production in vaxxed vs unvaxxed
The Graphs show for most age groups the unvaxxed have lower rates of infections but higher rates of ‘death”
The higher rate of death in the unvaxxed though could be that the shots kill ( and until 2 weeks after the second shot are you considered unvaxxed. Thats at least 5 weeks after the first shot if you die from the shot you are still”unvaxed”
Thanks
Not my summary. I copied it from “World Doctors Alliance” on Telegram.
This is page 24 that is referenced:
COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – week 42
24
Figure 6 shows monthly categorised Roche S levels in N-antibody negative individuals by age
group. Almost all tested S-antibody negative during December. In the 3 oldest age groups, the
impact of first vaccine dose, then second vaccine dose, can be seen from December through
June, as the profile of population antibody levels increases. Then from June through September
the profile of antibody levels in these cohorts gradually decreases, consistent with waning.
During October there is a small increase in percentage of donors with high antibody levels of
1000+ AU/ml for the 70 to 84 age group only, following the initiation of the booster programme.
The higher profile of antibody levels in the youngest age group, is likely a result of a
combination of factors including stronger immune responses in younger individuals and the
higher antibody levels produced after mRNA vaccination.
Figure 7 shows categorised Roche S levels in N-antibody positive individuals, those likely to
have experienced past infection. Pre-vaccination antibody levels will be influenced by time since
infection, variant and severity of infection, as well as personal factors such as underlying health
conditions and age. At the start of the vaccination rollout in December antibody levels typically
sat within the range of 0.8 to 1000 AU/ml, after vaccination antibody levels typically exceed
1000 AU/ml. Comparing Figure 6 with Figure 7, the overall higher profile of antibody levels in
those who have experienced past infection is evident; both vaccination post infection and
breakthrough infection following vaccination are expected to boost existing antibody levels.
Researchers across the globe are working to better understand what antibody levels mean in
terms of protection against COVID-19. Current thinking is that there is no threshold antibody
level that offers complete protection against infection, but instead that higher antibody levels are
likely to be associated with lower probability of infection
From page 23:
Seropositivity estimates for S antibody in blood donors are likely to be higher than would be
expected in the general population and this probably reflects the fact that donors are more likely
to be vaccinated. Seropositivity estimates for N antibody will underestimate the proportion of the
population previously infected due to (i) blood donors are potentially less likely to be exposed to
natural infection than age matched individuals in the general population (ii) waning of the N
antibody response over time and (iii) recent observations from UK Health Security Agency
(UKHSA) surveillance data that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire
infection following 2 doses of vaccination.
PK, I’m not seeing the reference to a permanent drop in N antibodies. The purebloods would love to know that we “did the right thing”.
Could you quote from the report?
From skimming the past 4 weeks of the Surveilance Reports I do see that over age 30 the cases per 100,000 in the fully jabbed are higher than the unjabbed. Some of that is due to the higher incidence of injections in those age groups, Appears that the cases are approaching the ratio of unjabbed to jabbed. Would indicate that the shots have failed as time elapses.
If we remember the mantra at the rollout that the jabs would prevent one from getting Covid (95% effective), to it would protect from a severe infection, to it would keep you out of the hospital, to keeping you off a ventilator, to not likely to die………… All proven false. When the CDC admitted that a jabbed person can transmit and become infected it should have been a wakeup call to our PHOs. The logic of a Vaccine Passport is totally nullified.
The booster shots for some reason adds a protective 2-3 months (Israel) They will likely rollout the fourth shot very soon to the vulnerable. Not sure how that works as they are priming with the same mRNA for the original strain of Covid. I guess there is not that much variation in the mutations at this point. I’m still of the opinion that the benefit of a possible 4 month window of protection for a virus 99% survive while taking on thrombotic risks is not worth the risk.
I’m wondering how the booster shots will skew the numbers over the next few months. I expect the numbers will favour the jabbed during this time.
When we look back on this time in the history of our world, I hope we’ve learned that Big Pharma captured our Bureaucrats and Technocrats who are calling the shots.
Expect the punishment to ramp up on the unjabbed before this is over. It’s not about health. Never was.
Are the jabs becoming less effective over time as THIS VIRUS mutates? Boosters wouldn’t be needed if this weren’t the case.
But I’m more concerned about what the spike proteins from the jabs are doing to overall health.
So I’m much more concerned about the risks from the jabs compromising the natural immunity that the jabbed ONCE HAD against all other pathogens (if one subscribes to germ theory).