Goldtent TA Paradise

THE FOUCH HAS A “SPOKESPERSON” NOW

1. Fullgoldcrown says:

   October 25, 2021 - 3:37 pm at 3:37 pm

   ? A Vanity Fair article published Saturday is headlined, “In Major Shift, NIH Admits Funding Risky Virus Research in Wuhan.” The article gingerly but definitely questions Fauci’s truthfulness to Congress, and even features an unattractive black and white picture of Fauci looking very stressed out.

   The article begins with a quote from Fauci to Rand Paul: “I I totally resent the lie you are now propagating.” That sets up the rest of the story. There are two critical documents: a letter from the NIH trying to explain a missing report, and a research status report from the EcoHealth Alliance to the NIH that was absent from previous government public record disclosures to Congress.

   According to the NIH, they just got the missing report in August of this year — two years overdue. It was a fifth and final progress report that EcoHealth Alliance had been required to submit at the end of its grant period in 2019. In other words, the NIH just saw it. They never saw it before. So there’s no way they could have known what it said, or something. They just accidentally overlooked the fact that the report was overdue. They don’t track that kind of stuff. It just showed up, unexpectedly, in the mail this August. You know how the postal service can be.

   The thing is, the report — which describes the enhancement by EcoHealth to make a coronavirus up to 10,000 times more infectious and make mice sicker — contradicts Fauci’s testimony to Congress, where he called it a “lie” that the NIH had funded ANY gain of function research on coronaviruses. So, the NIH explainer letter from last week is now saying that Fauci WAS telling the truth to Congress, because he’d never actually SEEN the report, since it was so tardy. Not his fault, in other words. He lied, but technically it wasn’t a lie, because you can’t prove he knew. Or something.

   Vanity Fair doesn’t seem to be buying it. The article reported, “the NIH letter—coming after months of congressional demands for more information—seemed to underscore that America’s premier science institute has been less than forthcoming about risky research it has funded and failed to properly monitor.”

   Less than forthcoming. That’s a nice way of saying they are lying liars.

   “It’s just another chapter in a sad tale of inadequate oversight, disregard for risk, and insensitivity to the importance of transparency,” said Stanford microbiologist Dr. David Relman. VERY sad.

   Vanity Fair wasn’t done. “The disclosures of the last four months … present an increasingly disturbing picture.” So they asked Fauci about all this. And his spokesperson (he has a spokesperson now) said you can’t call it “gain of function research” because, even though it DID increase transmissibility and DID increase virulence in humans, the original experiments “were not reasonably expected to increase transmissibility or virulence in humans.”

   In other words, Fauci’s saying that the genetic modifications EcoHealth Alliance was doing in the Chinese military bioweapons lab in Wuhan weren’t SUPPOSED to be gain of function. Nobody ever could have seen that coming. It was just a happy surprise!

   The article then reminds us of the leaked 2018 grant proposal by EcoHealth where they had proposed to partner with the Wuhan bioweapons lab to make SARS-related bat coronaviruses with “human-specific cleavage sites” to “evaluate growth potential” of the pathogens.

   According to the government, EcoHealth’s proposal was scotched. Rejected out of hand. Way too dangerous. Uh huh.

   Apparently I’m not the only one feeling skeptical. “If I applied for funding to paint Central Park purple and was denied, but then a year later we woke up to find Central Park painted purple, I’d be a prime suspect,” said Jamie Metzl, an official on the W.H.O.’s Covid advisory committee.

   Gilles Demaneuf, a data scientist in New Zealand working for a worldwide team researching Covid’s origins (called DRASTIC), told Vanity Fair “I cannot be sure [whether COVID-19 came from] a research-related accident or infection from a sampling trip. But I am 100% sure there was a massive cover-up.”

   Me too.

2. Kewl2 says:

   October 25, 2021 - 3:55 pm at 3:55 pm

   Ongoing!

   • Fullgoldcrown says:

     October 25, 2021 - 4:32 pm at 4:32 pm

     This is getting FUN

     MSM is piling on here

     And we haven’t even discussed Beaglegate .

     Fried Fauchi anyone ?