Considering what has been done personally to Kavanaugh, Flynn, Page and others, should people conclude, as FOX news has, that this is just another case of Trump crying wolf and anyone who would stoop so low can’t possibly be trusted or have their arguments heard? Nothing towards you Surf, but IMO, this article is purely designed to cast doubt in the minds of readers on Trump’s assertions – AKA FUD. This is why people don’t trust the media. If I asked someone if the volume of a glass had exactly 50% water whether it was half full or empty and 100% of the time they said it was half full – what credibility do they have after it’s pointed out that it could be half empty but they insist that it is ONLY half full and then assert that I’d have to be stupid to think otherwise. Ignore and walk away.
In general conservatives, welcome the half-full half-empty debate, leftists just want to suppress them or character smear anyone who disagrees esp. if they get enough ‘followers’.
Leftist strategy is to take the head and the body will follow, problem is they don’t realize how little POWER the ‘thought leaders’ really have in this country. That’s why their followers are often called NPC’s. Miley Cyrus said this, or Kapernick said that or T Swift thinks that .. who gives a fk – NPC’s that’s who.
YYZ, He has a pattern of calling Election Frauds in the past, so it is clear to me that his ego won’t allow him to say that he was a loser. Before the 2016 General Election, he stated many times that if he lost to Clinton it would be due to fraud but this is the first time I knew that it went back as far as the Republican primaries with Cruz.
So far he has lost 35 lawsuits due to lack of evidence. If he can get the proof he needs, great but his batting average is not very good right now.
If Trump can produce the evidence he needs and wins in court great. Until that happens, he has claimed fraud several times before and the Cruz primary is exactly the same script he is using today.
Another Trump lawsuit bites the dust setting up a trip to the Supreme Court. And don’t tell me ZH is a liberal site. ZH asks the question, “what happens if the Supreme Court decides to pass?” I plan to be patient and see how the appeal plays out.
I’ll tell you what will happen, SC. Everyone will know that the left is unstoppable. They have swallowed the executive branch; that is to say, if a president’s policies disagree with the swamp’s, they die. The legislative branch, it’s power justly derived from the people, is now worthless due to criminal vote tampering. And now, the obvious and easily provable corruption is given a pass by the one body whose roll it is to uphold the tenets of the constitution, thereby nullifying the entire basis of the republic. No big deal. Stay patient, SC.
BTW, The Appeals Court judge that dismissed the Pennsylvania case for lack of evidence was a Trump Appointee.
Also, no one has addressed the core issue of this post that Trump has been claiming election fraud for some time using the same basic script every time.
Trumps Tweet “Ted Cruz didn’t win Iowa, he stole it. That is why all of the polls were so wrong and why he got far more votes than anticipated. Bad!”
Trump was probably right back then, let’s say someone did have control of the election knows in 2016, Trump is more than suspicious in the Iowa primary, blames Cruz, all the while Barack and the boys controlling the the wizard of OZ knobs in the background. The boys back off the knobs for fear of being caught.
Fast forward to the 2016 general election, the folks controlling the knobs are ready to go, but because of the huge vote disparity realize that they can’t pull it off for Hillary. Barack immediately gives Hillary the bad news that they weren’t prepared to produce enough votes that night in that short of time frame and that she would have to concede.
Fast forward to 2020 and they thought that they were prepared, until the mountains of Trump votes came rolling in, they followed through, and now we are seeing history being made.
Hearst, you are probably right. A DemiGod like Trump would of course be infallible and right about everything. No real evidence that would stand up in a court of law should be needed. Also, a DemiGod would not be capable of telling us any lies so everything he says or Tweets should be believed as an article of faith. Bind trust is your best bet.
FOX provides evidence that says Trump has a habit of crying foul.
Maybe they are suggesting we should ignore the facts presented here?
https://goldtadise.com/?p=482062
Or the charges brought here…..
https://goldtadise.com/?p=481996
Considering what has been done personally to Kavanaugh, Flynn, Page and others, should people conclude, as FOX news has, that this is just another case of Trump crying wolf and anyone who would stoop so low can’t possibly be trusted or have their arguments heard? Nothing towards you Surf, but IMO, this article is purely designed to cast doubt in the minds of readers on Trump’s assertions – AKA FUD. This is why people don’t trust the media. If I asked someone if the volume of a glass had exactly 50% water whether it was half full or empty and 100% of the time they said it was half full – what credibility do they have after it’s pointed out that it could be half empty but they insist that it is ONLY half full and then assert that I’d have to be stupid to think otherwise. Ignore and walk away.
In general conservatives, welcome the half-full half-empty debate, leftists just want to suppress them or character smear anyone who disagrees esp. if they get enough ‘followers’.
Leftist strategy is to take the head and the body will follow, problem is they don’t realize how little POWER the ‘thought leaders’ really have in this country. That’s why their followers are often called NPC’s. Miley Cyrus said this, or Kapernick said that or T Swift thinks that .. who gives a fk – NPC’s that’s who.
Sorry surf kind of went off there….
YYZ, He has a pattern of calling Election Frauds in the past, so it is clear to me that his ego won’t allow him to say that he was a loser. Before the 2016 General Election, he stated many times that if he lost to Clinton it would be due to fraud but this is the first time I knew that it went back as far as the Republican primaries with Cruz.
So far he has lost 35 lawsuits due to lack of evidence. If he can get the proof he needs, great but his batting average is not very good right now.
There is obviously Massive Fraud
Of that there is No doubt
There is tons of proof and Thousands of witnesses
Losing court cases is not the issue.
Some cases were designed to lose to move forward to a higher court and some are just Liberal Judges doing their thing
Over Half the country agrees he lost by fraud
He was winning by a landslide..they stopped counting then miraculously at 4 AM the tide turned
You are a chart guy Surf….can you explain those Spikes at 3 AM ..the complete deviation from the curve ?
No you can’t unless you understand the depth of the fraud.
If Trump can produce the evidence he needs and wins in court great. Until that happens, he has claimed fraud several times before and the Cruz primary is exactly the same script he is using today.
https://spectator.org/what-we-must-believe-to-believe-biden-won/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=d00a088d38-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_11_17_10_43&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-d00a088d38-104865282
I am not a judge so I paln to wait and see how it all plays out in court.
Granted, his ego is only superceded by the size of his balls.
LOL. 🙂
Also can you explain how the guy who had a dozen people at his few rallies beat the guy who had millions in the last week alone ?
No you cannot
YOU are Judging Surf.
You are making the Claim that there was no fraud because Trump cries Wolf all the time.
We have presented reams of evidence of the fraud …It is already settled in the Court Of Common Sense.
Please present One bit of evidence that it was NOT fraud.
Please present one sworn statement from anybody that the things thousands of people are claiming they saw and swearing to it…are lying or misguided .
IF 2016 was won by fraud do you not think Hillary would have fought it in court ?
There was NO contest …what does that say ?
I have no time or interest to run down rabbit holes. The courts will eventually figure it out and I am fine with the outcome.
All I was saying is that it was News to Me that Trump was playing the same basic card all the way back to the 2016 Republician Primaries.
PS…FOX NEWS was the Fraud ring leader. They called Az early and it is NOT settled even now
But they refused to call FLA. even when it was a landslide.
After I saw the Fox article on Cruz, I searched for the event in 2016 and found several news stories on this event. Are those fake news as well?
I don’t know I am not reading them but if they come from ANY MSM source the probability is YES!
And whatever…It has nothing to do with THIS Election’s massive Fraud
You don’t need to be a judge to see it….Just need to read the evidence.
The Case will be judged politically not necessarily on its merits though….so we shall see which side “controls” the court
Another Trump lawsuit bites the dust setting up a trip to the Supreme Court. And don’t tell me ZH is a liberal site. ZH asks the question, “what happens if the Supreme Court decides to pass?” I plan to be patient and see how the appeal plays out.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/pennsylvania-appeals-court-tosses-trump-lawsuit-setting-stage-supreme-court-showdown
I’ll tell you what will happen, SC. Everyone will know that the left is unstoppable. They have swallowed the executive branch; that is to say, if a president’s policies disagree with the swamp’s, they die. The legislative branch, it’s power justly derived from the people, is now worthless due to criminal vote tampering. And now, the obvious and easily provable corruption is given a pass by the one body whose roll it is to uphold the tenets of the constitution, thereby nullifying the entire basis of the republic. No big deal. Stay patient, SC.
BTW, The Appeals Court judge that dismissed the Pennsylvania case for lack of evidence was a Trump Appointee.
Also, no one has addressed the core issue of this post that Trump has been claiming election fraud for some time using the same basic script every time.
Trumps Tweet “Ted Cruz didn’t win Iowa, he stole it. That is why all of the polls were so wrong and why he got far more votes than anticipated. Bad!”
Trump v Cruiz in an Iowa primary is insignificant compared to this monstrosity IMO
Also Surf you seem to be one Court Ruling behind the times in Penn. This Judge says NO Certification pending a hearing.
https://www.marklevinshow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/301/2020/11/Memorandum-Opinion-Filed.pdf
Trump was probably right back then, let’s say someone did have control of the election knows in 2016, Trump is more than suspicious in the Iowa primary, blames Cruz, all the while Barack and the boys controlling the the wizard of OZ knobs in the background. The boys back off the knobs for fear of being caught.
Fast forward to the 2016 general election, the folks controlling the knobs are ready to go, but because of the huge vote disparity realize that they can’t pull it off for Hillary. Barack immediately gives Hillary the bad news that they weren’t prepared to produce enough votes that night in that short of time frame and that she would have to concede.
Fast forward to 2020 and they thought that they were prepared, until the mountains of Trump votes came rolling in, they followed through, and now we are seeing history being made.
Hearst, you are probably right. A DemiGod like Trump would of course be infallible and right about everything. No real evidence that would stand up in a court of law should be needed. Also, a DemiGod would not be capable of telling us any lies so everything he says or Tweets should be believed as an article of faith. Bind trust is your best bet.