Loading ...HCQ CASE FATALITY RATES
That piece I posted this morning was very interesting explaining the chronology and genesis of the HCQ Controversy .
The Author went into great detail near the end to show the difference in CFR ( Deaths as divided by confirmed cases) in the EU and separately Germany vs Countries who early on and to this day have contravened WHO guidelines and are using HCQ routinely.
He Isolated Germany from the EU as it is held as the exemplary Country with the greatest success in CFR but they do not uses HCQ routinely.
I have wondered out loud on the board Why some countries have such low CFRs vs most oF the “First” World !
Here is the bottom line in a Graphic .
Suffice to say all the Countries listed below Germany are Routine HCQ Users.
Censored ( removed) …but of course !
Three other interesting cases cited by the author
1 Switzerland
At the end of May, when Lancet published the fraudulent study, several countries decided to cancel the authorization for use. Switzerland was one of them. It was banned on May 27. The country had a low daily death toll.
Between May 28 and June 7, only two people across the country died of COVID-19.
From June 8 to 23, Switzerland had 35 deaths.
The suspension did not last long. Switzerland has again authorized the use by doctors.
After June 23, deaths returned to a low level. In the next 15 days, Switzerland had only 7 deaths. The graph can be seen here on the Worldometers website.
2 New Brunswick
New Brunswick becomes Canada’s first province to “organize” and “authorize” the use of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of certain patients with COVID-19.
The confirmation is here.
On July 17, 168 cases, 2 deaths. It gives 1.19%. While in the whole of Canada, it is 8.08%.
3 South Dakota
Two news confirms. That South Dakota auditioned across the state. And that, stubborn and uncompromising, they continued using the drugs, even after FDA warnings.
On July 17, 7,789 cases, 116 deaths. 1.48%
All of the data with references are found in this piece from Brazil.
Note the author is a fierce Trump Hater ..but came to the conclusion that the suppression of HCQ is Politically Motivated by the American Left and Financially Motivated by Big Pharma.
Something Goldtent readers are very well aware of .
I did the Math and in the USA early on the CFR was close to 10% …now in sum it is 3.3% ( better than Germany)
Early on most cases were in the US North and North East ( Democrat States )
Now most cases are in the South ( largely Republican States ..except California)
But as we heard from the Frontline Doctors …many physicians are using HCQ in theUSA in spite of harrassment and barriers by the PTB….so it stands to reason the CFR has been falling.
Cases have skyrocketed but deaths have dropped ( with a small spike of late)
How many lives could have been saved in the early days in NY and all had the HCQ studies in 2005 been heeded .
Bottom line the author cites many studies and 80% show positive results for HCQ in early treatment .
Of the others the two largest negative studies were both retracted …one by Lancet and one by the New England Journal of Medicine as they were found to be not just unscientific but actually purposely fraudulent.
MURDER !
There are as usual many problems because the world is hard to control for a perfect clean experiment.
Arguably some places — NY State may be the #1 example — have a high death rate at least in part because of an unnecessarily aggressive or enthusiastic use of ventilators.
Arguably some places — again, NY comes to mind — could have had excess deaths in part be in part to policy on nursing homes.
These points by no means contradict the hypothesis that hydroxychloroquine use or lack thereof might have been a significant factor also.
Peiple will always also raise questions about demographics and crowding affecting the results.
I think it is nice to consider the possibility of multiple factors. Hydroxychloroquine usage or lack thereof definitely looks to be a candidate to consider.
I already mad my mind up
I have some ready to deploy and I would not hesitate to deploy it at first sign of symptoms for friends and family.
Its like a great trade set up Low Risk High Reward
That 2005 article explains why the WHO and others were primed and ready to denounce HCQ. Their epidemic scheme had only one weakness and that was HCQ. If HCQ was deployed by the Chinese at the beginning of the initial outbreak, then even the international spread of the virus would not have been a big enough threat to trigger lockdowns and all the other panic reactions because the disease would have been both preventable as well as treatable. People could just take HCQ and go to work. Anyone not wanting to take it would only be endangering themselves and not a threat to others because of their exposure because anyone wanting to “stay safe” would only need HCQ prophylaxis. The whole public health threat disappears and becomes only a personal health threat. No global or national panic in that.
Tim H, That is the whole ballgame in a nutshell. At some point China may very well have used it internally to limit extent of spread. It is the co-ordinated attack and prevention of it’s use in the US that proves Democratic governors, mayors etc. are more concerned with their political agenda(remove Trump) and economic agendas (ruin economy and make larger percent of population dependent on govt.) than the health and safety of people. Crime of the century.
Yikes! It’s been taken down. All you get now if you go to the link is this:
“Error
410
This account is under investigation or was found in violation of the Medium Rules.
There are thousands of stories to read on Medium. Visit our homepage
to find one that’s right for you.”