For Armstrong Watchers
From Art Roldan
Martin Armstrong just released his September Gold and Silver Update Report. He continues to maintain that Gold will bottom on one his upcoming Benchmark Cycles. The next benchmark is the week of December 7, 2015 and the one thereafter is the week of March 28, 2016. See the two red vertical lines on the chart linked to the url below.
It’s a fascinating report. He draws attention to the Gold/Silver ratio as one to follow into these two Benchmarks. The Benchmark is the convergence of the gold’s 16 week cycle and Silver’s 18 week cycle. In his report he delves into the history of the benchmark cycle together with the Gold/Silver ratio and how together they marked the major highs and lows for gold and silver.
What he posits this time around is that a spike high in this ratio on a benchmark date will project the low for gold and that this ratio could exceed 100 should gold test the 1980 high of 875. Ouch!!
https://www.tradingview.com/x/BykXJndG
He doesn’t project a final low for gold or silver other than to say that gold will fall below 1,000.
The high for this ratio in 1991 was 101.80. Note the inverse H&S pattern on this chart and its projection.
Going forward I will send an update of this chart each week.
He also revised his weekly and monthly reversal levels for gold and silver. I will make those changes and the weekly and monthly MA charts will reflect those changes.
He also provided new weekly and monthly arrays for gold and silver.
From those arrays my sense is the second March 28th benchmark will bring the final low for gold.
I highly recommend you purchase this report
Art Roldan
https://www.tradingview.com/x/BykXJndG
I bought the report. Read it this morning. His #’s are very similar to mine.
GSR next stop 85:1 (My Math)by late Fall. (Martins # was 86:1)
wonder if its ok to publish his “paid” for report findings in a public forum… guess you give a third party link though.. but the link does not provide the information provided in your post.
Art Rolden is an Armstrong watcher
I dunno if its OK for him to Quote Armastrong but its OK for us to quote Art
There ismuch more to the report btw
we have it too
.. perhaps post link where it says all that is said above as current links do not say that… i dont know either.. appreciate the post as did not realize armstrong updated his report
what i mean.. is the links you provide much more information than in the links… i believe art wrote the above.. but wonder is the all that is said above in your post public????.. it might be… but your links do not correlate with your post.