Goldtent TA Paradise

For future reference — Successful treatment of new-onset diabetes mellitus and IgA nephropathy after COVID-19 vaccination: a case report

1. Kewl2 says:

   December 27, 2023 - 1:36 pm at 1:36 pm

   From Covid & Coffee

   A wildly significant little study — it’s actually just a case report — quietly popped up in the American Journal of Translational Research last month, titled “Successful treatment of new-onset diabetes mellitus and IgA nephropathy after COVID-19 vaccination: a case report.” It offers substantial hope to vaccine injured folks, far beyond its plain meaning.

   In this case report, the researchers described a 56-year-old man who spontaneously developed atypical, adult-onset Type 2 diabetes three months after his third jab. Significantly, he had no “genetic predisposition” to diabetes, and he never had covid:

   The patient was never infected with COVID-19. He had no known COVID-19 exposures and did not experience flu-like illness throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. He had no family history of kidney disease.

   The introduction’s first three sentences showed amazing progress. Apparently researchers can now get published without having to idolize the jabs at all. Well, they still have to say the shots were important, but look how matter of fact the language has become:

   COVID-19 vaccine has been administered in almost all countries as a critical measure used to control the pandemic. However, COVID-19 vaccination-related glomerular (kidney) diseases have become a new concern. Both the mRNA vaccine and the inactivated vaccine can cause new-onset and relapsing glomerular (kidney) disease. These diseases typically occur after the first or second dose of vaccination.

   Haha. So much for “safe and effective.” The researchers stated as an obvious fact that the mRNA vaccine can cause new-onset (and relapsed) kidney disease. They didn’t even squawk it was “rare.” (They even said typically occur awfully close to the word disease.) They ignored the drooling idiots infecting the useless CDC and captured FDA, neither of which apparently has the slightest idea at all that mRNA vaccines can cause kidney diseases. Lalalalala we can’t hear you.

   Science.

   It was me who called the patient’s diabetes “atypical,” which to me is a flag for vaccine involvement. But his doctors used more clinical language. Still, it because his disease was atypical that they discovered a successful treatment.

   The researchers said they ultimately treated his diabetes as a vaccine injury rather than a blood sugar disorder, rejecting insulin — which was not helping much — and successfully controlled his diabetes using steroids for the inflammation and a leukemia drug to treat his vaccine-induced autoimmunity. Both drugs are normally contraindicated for diabetes; in fact, the steroids usually make kidney disease worse. In the researcher’s own words (lightly edited for clarity):

   This case is unique because the kidneys and pancreas were simultaneously affected by the vaccine. Although correlation does not imply causation, the onset of symptoms of injury of two organs soon after vaccination should be considered as the inciting event. And in this case, it was strange that the patient’s blood sugar level was dramatically high within a short period, without any history of diabetes or a propensity to the disease. Therefore we suspected that the diabetes was caused by an immunological mechanism triggered by the COVID-19 vaccination.

   Based on the vaccine-related mechanism of the immune reaction, we treated the patient with glucocorticoid (a steroid) and cyclophosphamide (a leukemia drug) and successfully controlled the diabetes mellitus within a short period.

   In general, glucocorticoids are considered a medication that can worsen diabetes and harm pancreas function, ostensibly leading to an increase in blood glucose levels. Given this response, glucocorticoids are rarely used to treat diabetes mellitus.

   This little case report is some of the best news to come down the pike in a while. The patient’s doctors ignored the CDC, did not gaslight him, and actually considered whether the vaccines might have caused his illness. In other words, because his doctors were open-minded about the possibility of vaccine injury, and were willing to try treating him as vaccine injured — not as what it looked like on the med school flow chart (“diabetes”) — this patient is now recovering instead of baffling doctors by getting worse and worse.

   Bless these doctors who used their skills and training and thought for themselves.

   I bet my next paycheck that “covid vaccine injury” is not listed anywhere on Medicare’s reimbursement guidelines. But I bet diabetes is on there; you betcha. We can assume the doctors would have earned more from treating his diabetes than they did from treating his covid vaccine injury. In other words, they were even more courageous and independent than it looks at first.

   In an interesting side note, this patient got the Chinese Sinovac vaccine, which is based on inactivated virus and not mRNA. But based on the growing body of academic evidence (well illustrated in the report’s footnotes), the authors explicitly included mRNA vaccines at nearly every opportunity. The other fascinating point was what the report tells us about how harmful spike really is. Since the Sinovac jab only includes “attenuated” or inactive virus, and still can give you sudden diabetes, it must be that even dead spike protein can cause very serious adverse events.

   What a perfectly horrible idea to code spike protein into the mRNA vaccines. Oh well, that’s Science! Don’t be a denier!

   There’s a lot of hope to be found in this little vaccine-induced diabetes case report. Maybe most hopeful of all is that at least some doctors have stopped gaslighting victims and started looking for solutions. We’re getting there.