Loading ...To YYZ and Kestrel — “Its unfortunate because they haven’t been paying attention”
For god’s sake, do a little digging before you parrot or extrapolate using crap media like this.
As Tulsi says in this clip, “Its unfortunate because they haven’t been paying attention”
WEF invites people. It doesn’t mean they accept. It doesn’t mean they agree.
Invitees might even use their opportunities to speak out directly against them, as Gabbard said.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiFvNlS6c4A
and just search on Milei and “climate change” as “socialist hoax”
Schwab won’t be smiling on those remarks. Not that he ever smiles.
Agree with pedro
100%
I have been to Otario Dental association meetings BUT I do not support any of their covid policies for instance
Thank you Pedro.I dont know what crap media you are referring to…….?!.
I never trusted Meloni as a few may remember.
Goldtent endorsed her .
I fear Melei…
This is a conversation forum.
I didnt extrapolate from any site.
That would be very superficial.
I simply do not like or respect him from what I have read from different sources.
Time will tell
Pretty soon I think.
All of our insight is encouraged here.
Tulsi was a temp member of the CFR (5 yrs)
https://www.reddit.com/r/tulsi/comments/blybco/tulsi_gabbard_explains_her_relationship_with_the/
So she’s explained it… maybe she doesn’t realize who the CFR is, their origins and what their mission is in relation to what the WEF’s is.
2016 she was on the outs with the Dem party machine and supported Bernie Sanders – what does B.S. and Rep’s have in common – other than they opposed Clinton? /s Naivete’ is the best defense I believe she’d have – oh, look there’s the Rep party, maybe they’ll take me in.
Based on my review of her political career since age 21, she has shown that she is either ignorant of the driving forces behind political organizations or she can sense where the political winds are going and that’s what drives her. I will say to her credit many of her early positions were not in-line with the Dem party but many were also.
Simply put, I don’t trust her and there are a lot of other candidates for political office that have more consistent track records than she does.
Would she ever call out Hirono in HI out as socialist/communist, probably not but I can’t believe she hasn’t figured it out.
Tulsi strongly advocated for vaccination of the elderly and not healthy younger people. What did she know or didn’t know about it in 2022 – not the smartest tool in the shed (and no I’m not giving DJT a pass either).
2018 Hawaii Dem complains about Tulsi’s lukewarm gun rights stance.
https://www.civilbeat.org/2018/03/tulsi-gabbards-record-on-gun-control-is-a-moving-target/
“We reached out to both her campaign and official House spokesperson. We dropped by her Washington office and tried to catch her in the capitol hallways between votes. We even texted and called her cell phone. Still, we were told she was unavailable.
Gabbard’s gun record could easily be described as sporadic.
While Gabbard now seems to be saying all the right things for someone in her position — that she supports universal background checks, closing the gun show loophole and banning military-style assault weapons — it hasn’t always been reflected in her actions.
She’s been slow to sign on to a number of gun control measures that have received widespread support among her Democratic Party colleagues. Sometimes she’s just a no-show.”
Even if she was not a ‘supporting’ member of the WEF (despite evidence of her affiliation by the WEF) “I did not authorize them to use my photo”. There are LOTS of politicians who have more consistent philosophical track records to get behind.
Yes, FGC isn’t going to be ‘tainted’ by attendance at a conference but then again, Professor Yuval Noah Harari is not a driving force behind their ambitions. If anything Tulsi’s position and enthusiasm on issues should be more akin to DeSantis’, Ramaswamy’s or Trump’s (she opposed getting us out of the NAFTA deal). RE: Melei, I’m with Kestrel – we’ll see what an Anarcho Capitalist has in store for his country.
Good to see the detail from you.
My point was simple. Just because WEF targets someone, and puts their names in their brochures, doesn’t mean he or she is on their team. And its deceiving to imply otherwise. End of point.
Re Tulsi, I’ve been following her since she did 2 hours with Joe Rogan many years ago. One of DBC’s many pointers, by the way.
All that is really important here is that she is one of many democrats that have abandoned that ship.
James Howard Kuntlser is another.
I did too, but that was decades ago.
Insinuating that those 33 were all WEF acolytes was just pot shot smear campaign.
I knew better, but others were going to take the bait. And did.
We’re supposed to be the clear thinkers here, not caught in the deceptive media cross fire. So I stepped in.
Point taken, thank you Pedro.
I’ve been watching the media’s incestuous relationship with the Dem party and their agenda since Bill Clinton came on the scene. Before that I used to listen to NPR and all kinds of BS (fresh out of college) – we all have our AHAA! moment.
Just like a post earlier today about how Newsom’s purported opposition to getting DJT off the California ballot is ‘suspicious’ – I guess I can’t bring myself to trust ex-career democrats in positions of power.
Regarding MELEI – I really enjoyed his T Carlson interview – well spoken and not the attention seeking clown I’ve seen him in other videos. Agreed – I don’t know his relationship to the WEF and just because the WEF has him highlighted on their website doesn’t mean he’s on board with the agenda. My opinion on him is developing, much as it is with Ramaswamy, Desantis and RFK Jr. Gguess I’m a bit more jaded on Tulsi though.
About the site “People’s Voice” – YES absolutely, I don’t believe the article ‘banners’ are always justified – they sensationalize a lot where I don’t think it’s warranted BUT, the stories they come up with makes me go digging where otherwise I wouldn’t. Admittedly, the substance of the article’s often don’t support the Headline. While I recognize the FLAWS of this site, I do think they bring things to my attention that I end up seeing on ZH and elsewhere days later. It’s a mixed bag – my intent was not to do a ‘drive by’ with that post – I’ll be more mindful of that.
Your reflections, put into word, are very much appreciated.
Re Tulsi, there is no way I’d vote for her based on her DOMESTIC policy views, akin to Sanders. But I wouldn’t hesitate to support her as Sec of State.
As for Gruesome, there is a backstory there yet to unfold, and I’ll be on the lookout for that one! Re Milei, Ron Paul could have done with some of that attention seeking clowning if that’s what’s needed to draw votes. And some of Trump’s sharp elbows too. You have to be able to reposition for the task at hand.
Good discussion guys
I’ll be Blunt
Melei is the opposite of Klaus freaking Schwab.
Sometimes people are exactly what you see .