Loading ...ARE NUKES REALLY LONG TERM EXISTENTIALLY TOXIC ?
This is a question we should be exploring at this time with many pundants saying a Nuclear Event is about to happen at any moment. Either Dirty Bombs Tactical Nukes or an Attack on the ZNPP in Ukraine
Here is an interesting article …it shows Animal Populations thriving in the Fukushima area …which is still not largely inhabited by humans
FUKUSHIMA
How Long Will Fukushima Stay Radioactive?
https://www.discovermagazine.com/environment/how-long-will-fukushima-stay-radioactive
THREE MILE ISLAND
https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/5-facts-know-about-three-mile-island
CHERNOBYL
Life goes on at Chernobyl 35 years after the world’s worst nuclear accident
Although there were mass evacuations following the radioactive catastrophe, Chernobyl never fully emptied of people.
Similar articles show that Hiroshima and Nagasaki has similar experiences .
Is it possible this Nuclear holocaust is another Hoax ? No doubt a Nuke Bomb exploding over your head would be devestating but are these Nuclear “leaks” all that devestating ?
Even if animal numbers rebound in the contaminated area, I don’t see ANY attention paid in this “popular science” piece to their longevity, nor to their physiology.
Numbers can grow due to migration.
They can also grow if they are lower on the food chain. Adverse effects tend to be found higher up (eg, mercury in predator fish).
What then matters is how long can individual inhabitants live amidst the radioactive landscape?
And are there unwelcome mutations?
No attention to these questions at all, that I saw.