Loading ...Justin Trudeau lost at the Emergencies Act inquiry
If justifying the Emergencies Act requires legal gymnastics and technicalities, it’s because the facts of the case don’t readily support it.
With no evidence of espionage or sabotage, foreign influenced activities, acts of serious violence, or covert unlawful acts, the debate shifted to a redefinition of the very threats the Emergencies Act was intended to address.
The more into the weeds the lawyers got about the intricacies of the Emergencies Act and CSIS Act, the more apparent it was that no facts existed to support the government’s narrative.
https://andrewlawton.substack.com/p/justin-trudeau-lost-at-the-emergencies?
“No facts existed to support the government’s narrative.”
No facts exist to support Canada’s narrative. Let’s call it a day, and admit the obvious. It’s every region for itself!