I just saw a Yahoo headline:

“Vaccine hesitancy now almost wholly a GOP problem”

Most of us know that the phrase “vaccine hesitancy” is propaganda, mind control, whatever you want to call it.  As a meme has it (probably with a naughty word), something like, “I’m not hesitant–I’m just not XXXX getting it.”   I found the meme on the leftist UK off-guardian.com, put there by a US person with fairly clearly leftist pedigree.  You and I know that plenty of non-voters or Ds aren’t getting it unless they are forced to get it or given it surreptitiously.  Among these, clearly, are many blacks who have ample reason for skepticism.   This headline was intended to push the falsehood that “We all have gotten it except for a minority of backward holdouts, and we know who they are.  They are white nationalist/supremacist redneck racist GOPers.  They need to be marginalized.”  There are other undercurrents IMO such as making R voters defensive so that they will support their identity as R to enable R vs D divide-and-rule to continue as a distraction from main issues.  An amusing undercurrent is that the headline is profoundly racist in that it ignores how in particular blacks are pretty clearly not rushing to get the shots.

The headline is clearly untrue.  We are used to headlines that are clearly untrue.  I think it is a good project to ask yourself when you became used to seeing obviously untrue headlines as a routine.  Was it actually earlier than you realized?  Also, are some of the media that you think of as reliable playing you in subtle ways while making valid or somewhat valid points about those groups you do not like?  Frankly I am inclined to see something akin to disinformation or divide-and-rule almost everywhere I look.

I have read the assertion that towards the end people in the USSR were putting their TVs in the window faced outside, volume up.

Is one of the reasons people in the “West” do not catch on (that’s the way I see it anyway) because there are outlets that seem to voice their perspectives — after a fashion — in a way so as to foster divide-and-rule?  For example, so as to make Rs dislike the Ds, ‘conservatives’ the ‘left’, this ethnic group that, etc by creating false oppositions?    This is not a new idea BTW.  You’ve read it before.  Is it maybe more real than we realized?

 

(Gee, for some odd reason I don’t see too many corporate-sponsored demonstrations against oligarch privilege for some reason, or billionaire-sponsored “libertarian” seminars worrying about “capitalism” and “free” this or that that funnels capital to billionaires who strengthen the State and their own grip on it.)