J C
Of all places, the Miami Herald ran a vaccine-skeptical story last week, headlined, “COVID Booster May Lower Protection Against Omicron Reinfection, Study Finds. Here’s Why.” The fact that a science-loving liberal newspaper like the Miami Herald could deny vaccine science like this is ten times worse than the horrors of climate change.

Anyway, the article reported on a Qatar study titled “COVID-19 primary series and booster vaccination and immune imprinting.” According to the Herald, the researchers found that triple-jabbed patients were more often reinfected with an Omicron variant than were twice-jabbed patients.

In other words, that one more jab was one jab too many. Should’ve stuck with two.

Researchers concluded the higher risk of reinfection occurred because “the immune response against the primary omicron infection was compromised by differential immune imprinting in those who received a third booster dose, consistent with emerging laboratory science data.”

That’s a mouthful, but “immune imprinting” occurs when exposure to part of a virus through vaccination subsequently suppresses a person’s immune response against future new variants. The notion is that the immune system can get “locked in” to a specific past variant by a vaccine, becoming ineffective at countering new variant types.

This happens mostly when the virus is a type that quickly evolves. Like coronaviruses. They’ve known about immune imprinting for a long time. Some people even warned it could happen with covid jabs.

Anyway, according to the study and the Herald article, not only does the third shot NOT work, but it also makes you MORE likely to catch covid. That means it’s working! Haha, the experts euphemistically call this kind of vaccine failure “negative efficacy.” It’s like buying a fire-sprinkler system that short circuits, making it more likely your house will burn down.

In other words, they’re a garbage product. But good luck getting your money back. All jabs are final.