I did not know this:

Question Now is…do they have the guts to fulfill their constitutional duty ?

“Under the Constitution the state Legislature always retains 100% exclusive legal right to appoint its electors directly, and it should not hesitate to do so whenever it thinks their state’s election result is lacking in credibility, or if the margin of victory looks smaller than the margin of problems, or if their election rules weren’t followed faithfully.

Times like these are why the founders put Pres Electors solely into their hands. (not into judges hands, or crooked county election board officers, etc). They are the check and balance (not Scotus). Just like with impeachments, the standard is up to the sole judgement of the legislators, who in turn answer to their people. When the legislature abandons its right to override, the big-city machine knows there is effectively no ‘controlling legal authority’ over their hustle, even when it’s an open secret.

Republicans control both houses of legislature in MI, WI, PA, GA, AZ. They are the only ones who actually have the power to stop a steal, override a fraud, or fix a big failure. They just need the guts and conviction to do what is their right and duty to do. And we have to have their backs when they do.

imo the Speaker of the legislature should announce:
– The state’s Pres election result may not be credible, or that their election laws were changed or ignored. Margin of victory is too small with mistakes/irregularities too large, for any confidence in the end result with such high stakes.
– Will review of ballots, reporting, chain-of-custody, application of legislatures rules, and ask for everyone to document (where possible) or testify to things that are fishy, don’t add up, etc
– Legislature will meet to review it, and will exercise its right to appoint the electors directly if they judge the results are not credible, mail-in system or ballot custody/progeny fails integrity, etc.”