Goldtent TA Paradise

BOMBSHELL: New FOIA Documents Reveal the COVID Pandemic Was a DoD Operation Dating Back to Obama

1. Chartsmaster says:

   January 12, 2023 - 4:00 pm at 4:00 pm

   While it will never happen, this is what should. Why do we spend trillons on the military. The Constitution did not entail having a standing army. The National Guard and the state militia’s are enough with only US military bases for purposes of defense. Get rid of the enormous number of bases around the world. Stop wasting money everywhere else. Eliminate all of these various deep state defense agencies. We could eliminate income taxes and balance the budget and stop printing money. It was fine for 200 years. It is the last 50 where evrything has gone off the rails and out of control.

2. Kewl2 says:

   January 12, 2023 - 5:29 pm at 5:29 pm

   Psychologically it seems easier to fight an unknown enemy (individual, corporation, organization or cabal) than it is to find out that our own government / military is executing a totalitarian coup d’etait & controlled depopulation operation. While we can gather strength in numbers to fight external groups, how is the citizenry to react when they find that millions are dying (have died) at the hands of our own government secret agendas?

   This linkage to our Military was first identified many months ago and it is no easier to mentally comprehend today than it was when first uncovered. What is MUCH clearer is the verified links confirming by many independent researchers that COVID is a decades long operation run by the US Military. Every country seems to have signed up as per the 1992 Rio De Janeiro Conference that led to the 1994 depopulation agreements contained within UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030.

   What possible opportunity exists to stop this carnage if all governments are committed to these goals?

   Does anyone understand their game plan? What comes next?

3. Banimal says:

   January 12, 2023 - 11:44 pm at 11:44 pm

   Of course there will be opposition to letting Pfizer off the hook for all the deaths, and it’s coming from Karen Kingston no less, who is also an expert in the field. Here’s what she has to say about it below.

   Will We Fall For the Latest Expert Psyop Protecting Pfizer from Criminal Liability?

   Misrepresenting EUA Law and DOD Contracts: How Experts Continue to Convince Americans that Pfizer Has Immunity
   KAREN KINGSTON
   JAN 10
   ?

   Have you noticed that the ongoing ‘breaking patriot news’ from trusted expert on the regulatory scandals for the FDA approval of Pfizer’s mRNA injections all protect Pfizer? The latest story is from Sasha Latypova claiming that the FDA-authorization and approval was ‘political theatre’ done under a secret military operation and therefore didn’t really happen. Remember when Dr. Malone told us the FDA-approval for Pfizer was actually for BioNTech, not Pfizer, and that was why it didn’t really happen?

   The FDA-approved Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines on August 23, 2021, breaking Pfizer’s emergency use authorization immunity shield. I broke this news with Stew Peters on August 25, 2021, but other experts strongly disagreed and defended Pfizer, specifically Dr. Robert Malone. You can read about Dr. Malone’s coverage of Pfizer’s immunity regardless of FDA-approval and engagement in post-marketing activities here and here.

   Due to constant tagging, I watched two interviews with Sasha Latypova claiming that because EUA products are medical countermeasure (MCM), such as the COVID-19 vaccines, as medical countermeasures they can not go through the FDA-approval process or FDA-authorization process at all, and that the FDA authorization, initial new drug application and approval processes for the COVID-19 vaccines were all ‘just for show’. These claims are false and misleading propaganda to try and convince us that Pfizer and the FDA have iron-clad immunity to intentionally inflict disease, disabilities and death with a bioweapon, and there is nothing the American people can do about it.

   This is the key take away from the spin Sasha has puts on the documents I have previously shared on Stew Peters (January 2021 interview reviewing of DoD contracts) and in my Substack.

   But take my word for it, listen to Clayton Morris introduce his summary of Sasha’s ‘bombshell newly obtained documents’.

   “Bombshell new report shows the DOD Pentagon controlled the COVID-19 program from the beginning and everything we were told was politically theatre, basically to cover it up, right down to the FDA vaccine approval process. It was all theatre, that means that human beings were used as props, essentially. According to newly obtained documents, the Pentagon used a combination of shady approval authorizations that are still in use, including the PREP Act, EUA Law, shielded Big pharma, agencies, medical participants that delivered unregulated vaccines from any liability and protected them and they are not on the hook for any of this, liability, these new documents are from the former executive of a contract research organization – Sasha Latypova” – Clayton Morris

   At 6:47 mark in interview.

   SASHA: These are not vaccines, these are medical countermeasures. They can use a lot of secrecy. They don’t have to run clinical trials. They are not required because these products cannot be investigational products. That’s what the law says. If they cannot be investigational products then we don’t have any investigation. We don’t have any clinical trial subjects. So that’s how they are pulling this off.

   These statements are deceptive from the perspective of a legal argument. Per the law and contracts, the medical counter measure is a vaccine that is subject to FDA EUA laws and/or initial new drug application(IND)/FDA-approval laws. To say that the clinical trials don’t exist because they can’t for a product that was authorized as a medical countermeasure is either intentionally deceptive and reckless or just completely ignorant.

   Share

   Per Pfizer’s July 21, 2020, manufacturing agreement with the Department of Defense (DOD), the manufacturing and deployment of 100 million doses of a ‘candidate vaccine’ is subject to, “technical, clinical and regulatory (FDA) success.”

   The DOD contract clearly states that, “Pfizer will meet the necessary FDA requirements for conducting clinical trials in collaboration with BioNTech,” and that these trials, “are regulated by the FDA and HHS, there is no need for separate regulation by the US Army Medical Research.”

   This means that while Pfizer was contracted to manufacturer the 100 million vials, completion of the contract and deployment of those vials on the US population was contingent on FDA requirements separate from any processes or authority of the US military.

   While PFIZER had 100% iron-clad immunity against any harm caused by their EUA mRNA vaccine, that iron-clad immunity shield is ‘separate and distinct’ from an FDA-approved mRNA product.

   The FDA-approved mRNA products are subject to the laws of the Food and Drug Consumer Protection Act and are not protected by the immunity clauses in PFIZER’s contract with the US military.

   • Kewl2 says:

     January 13, 2023 - 12:32 am at 12:32 am

     “The FDA-approved mRNA products are subject to the laws of the Food and Drug Consumer Protection Act and are not protected by the immunity clauses in PFIZER’s contract with the US military.” — I understand this to be true – however – there are numerous articles / experts that have confirmed Pfizer never manufactured or distributed any of the FDA approved mRNA products in order to avoid this liability. They continued to distribute ONLY the EUA products as these provided them with 100% immunity.

     In fact, it was this continued use of EUA vials (versus brand approved vials) that enabled the argument that no individual can be forced to take an experimental drug as per Nuremberg rules.