Goldtent TA Paradise

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT FILING

1. silverboom says:

   December 12, 2021 - 10:42 pm at 10:42 pm

   Nope, bad link, does not work.

2. Fullgoldcrown says:

   December 12, 2021 - 10:47 pm at 10:47 pm

   It’s a PDF …but screw it…It’s a new Action Filed in the International Criminal Court…whatever that is

   Filed by Some Heavyweights though…Here is a bit of it

   International Criminal Court
   Office of the Prosecutor
   Communications
   Post Office Box 19519
   2500 CM The Hague
   The Netherlands
   EMAIL: otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
   BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
   (TREATY OF ROME STATUTE, ART. 15.1 AND 53)
   Subject of complaint:
   – Violations of the Nuremberg Code
   – Violation of Article 6 of the Rome Statute
   – Violation of Article 7 of the Rome Statute
   – Violation of Article 8 of the Rome
   – Violation of Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute
   Based on the extensive claims and enclosed documentation, we charge those responsible for
   numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes
   of aggression in the United Kingdom, but not limited to individuals in these countries.
   Perpetrators: Prime Minister for the United Kingdom BORIS JOHNSON, Chief Medical
   Officer for England and Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government CHRISTOPHER
   WHITTY, (former) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care MATTHEW HANCOCK,
   (current) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care SAJID JAVID, Chief Executive of
   Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) JUNE RAINE, DirectorGeneral of the World Health Organisation TEDROS ADANHOM GHEBREYESUS, Co-chair
   of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation WILLIAM GATES III and Co-chair of the Bill and
   Melinda Gates Foundation MELINDA GATES, Chairman and Chief executive officer of
   Pfizer ALBERT BOURLA, Chief Executive Officer of AstraZeneca STEPHANE BANCEL,
   Chief Executive Officer of Moderna PASCAL SORIOT, Chief Executive of Johnson and
   2
   Johnson ALEX GORSKY, President of the Rockefeller Foundation DR RAJIV SHAH,
   Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) DR ANTHONY
   FAUCI, Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum KLAUS SCWAB,
   President of EcoHealth Alliance DR PETER DASZACK
   Victim(s): THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
   Applicants:
   Hannah Rose – Lawyer and human rights activist
   Dr Mike Yeadon – Qualified life science researcher with a degree in biochemistry in toxicology, and
   a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology, former Vice President and Chief Scientist of
   allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer
   Piers Corbyn – Astrophysicist and activist
   Mark Sexton – Retired Police officer
   John O’Loony – Funeral Director and activist
   Johnny McStay – Activist
   Louise Shotbolt – Nurse and human rights activist
   Legal representation and election of domicile
   The applicants will be represented for the purposes of this procedure by Hannah Rose
   Email: hannahroses111@hotmail.com
   Consequently, all subsequent correspondence shall be sent only to the email address given above. Any
   notification within the meaning of the Statute of the Court addressed in this way will be considered
   valid.
   Mr Prosecutor,
   1 This communication and complaint is provided to the office of the Prosecutor pursuant to the
   United Kingdom’s accession to the International Criminal Court’s Rome Statute deposited with
   the Secretary-General of the United Nations on October 4, 2000.
   3
   2 We have tried to raise this case through the local English police and the English Court system
   without success, we have been unable to even get the case registered either with the police or
   with the court after several attempts. The statute for the ICC declares that “The ICC is intended
   to complement, not to replace, national criminal systems; it prosecutes cases only when a State
   is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution (Article
   17(1)(a)). This is such a case which is why we are addressing the ICC directly.
   A. BACKGROUND
   3 The Corona virus ‘vaccines’
   are an innovative medical treatment, which have only received temporary Authorisation under
   Regulation 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations Act (2012). The long-term effects and
   safety of the treatment in recipients are unknown. It is important to note that the Corona Virus
   ‘vaccines’ are the world’s first introduction to the synthetic m-RNA technology and all
   previous immunisations worked in a totally different manner, by way of introducing a
   deactivated or weakened virus to the body to trigger a natural arousal of the immune system
   against it. As detailed by Dr Mike Yeadon, the risks anticipated by this innovative medical
   treatment are hereby enclosed as Appendix 1 to this request.
   4 All Phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials are ongoing and not due to conclude until late 2022/early
   2023. The vaccines are, therefore, currently experimental with only limited short-term and no
   long-term adult safety data available. In addition, they are using a completely new mRNA
   vaccine technology, which has never previously been approved for use in humans. The mRNA
   is effectively a pro-drug and it is not known how much spike protein any individual will
   produce. Potential late-onset effects can take months or years to become apparent. The limited
   children’s trials undertaken to date are totally underpowered to rule out uncommon but severe
   side effects.
   5 The Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ do not meet the requirements to be categorised as vaccines and are in
   fact gene therapy (Appendix 8). The Merriam-Webster dictionary quietly changed the
   definition of the term ‘vaccine’ to include components of the COVID-19 m-RNA injection.
   The definition of vaccine was specifically changed due to the Covid-19 injection on February
   5
   th 2021. Dr Mike Yeadon, joint applicant on this request, asserts that claims calling the Covid19 injections a ‘vaccine is public manipulation and misrepresentation of clinical treatment. It’s
   4
   not a vaccination. It’s not prohibiting infection. It’s not a prohibiting transmission device. It’s
   a means by which your body is conscripted to make the toxin that then allegedly your body
   somehow gets used to dealing with it, but unlike a vaccine, which is to trigger the immune
   response, this is to trigger the creation of the toxin.’ MRNA uses the cell’s machinery to
   synthesize proteins that are supposed to resemble the SPIKE protein of the virus, which is what
   it uses to enter cells via the ACE2 receptor. These proteins are then identified by the immune
   system, which builds antibodies against them. The real concern is that these proteins could
   accumulate in the body especially in regions of high concentration of ACE2 receptors, such as
   the gonads. If the immune system then attacks the location where they accumulate, then you
   could be dealing with an auto-immune condition.

3. Fullgoldcrown says:

   December 12, 2021 - 10:49 pm at 10:49 pm

   PCR Tests
   A review from the University of Oxford’s Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (Appendix 2)
   found that the standard PRC test is so sensitive, that it can detect old infections by picking up
   fragments of dead viral cells. Originally developed to detect the presence of DNA and RNA in
   biological samples, even its Nobel Prize-winning inventor Kary Mullis declared that PCR was
   never intended to diagnose a disease. It simply detects the presence of specific genetic material,
   which may or may not indicate infection. As Dr. Kary Mullis put it, the PCR technique can
   find almost anything in anybody. The PCR test uses amplification cycles to find viral RNA.
   The sample is repeatedly chemically amplified to increase the RNA copies until they can be
   detected. Each “cycle” of amplification doubles the number of molecules in a sample. If you
   run enough cycles, you can effectively find a single molecule of any substance. Public Health
   England (PHE) policy confirms that the cycle threshold should be set around 25.6 and if the
   machine must run more than 25 to 35 cycles (Appendix 2a) to get the sample to the test’s Limit
   of Detection, there isn’t enough virus in the sample to matter clinically.
   5
   (Appendix 2a)
   We have information from freedom of information requests that as many as 40-45 cycles are
   being carried out (Appendix 3, 3a, 3b, 3c) which is too many because it increases the chance
   of a positive result even without coronavirus RNA being present in the original sample – hence
   the ‘asymptomatic’ individuals. In addition to being completely unreliable the PCR tests also
   contain carcinogenic ethylene oxide. (Appendix 48)
   7 Covid is a biological weapon – Gain of function research
   Chinese Virologist Li-Meng Yan was among the first researchers to study covid-19 in China
   after she was enlisted to investigate the origin of the virus by superior Leo Poon. Dr Li-Meng
   Yan and her team published a report (Appendix 4) claiming that the novel coronavirus was
   developed “as a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as
   a template and/or backbone.” The report states that “ZC45 and ZXC21 were discovered
   between July 2015 and February 2017 and isolated and characterized by the aforementioned
   military research laboratories.” It also says that when a non-military lab, the Shanghai Public
   Health Clinical Centre, published a Nature article reporting “a conflicting close phylogenetic
   relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and ZC45/ZXC2 rather than with RaTG13, was quickly
   shut down for ‘rectification.’” The report also accuses several publications of bowing to
   6
   political pressure or of experiencing “conflicts of interest” so as not to publish findings that
   differ from the natural origin theory. “The existing scientific publications supporting a natural
   origin theory rely heavily on a single piece of evidence – a previously discovered bat
   coronavirus named RaTG13, which shares a 96% nucleotide sequence identity with SARSCoV-2,”.
   8 The National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the USA has admitted to funding of gain of function
   research on bat coronaviruses at China’s Wuhan lab – despite Dr Anthony Fauci repeatedly
   denying this. In a letter to Republican James Comer (Appendix 5), NIH’s principal deputy
   director A. Tabak, blamed EcoHealth Alliance – that funnelled US funds to the Wuhan lab –
   for not being transparent about the work it was doing. British scientist Peter Daszak who runs
   EcoHealth is accused by Tabak of failing to comply with the terms of the grant. As recently as
   November 2021 Fauci was accused of lying about gain of function research after documents
   obtained by the intercept (Appendix 6) detailed grants given to EcoHealth Alliance for bat
   coronavirus studies. The $3.1 million grant was awarded for a five-year period between 2014
   and 2019. After the funding was renewed in 2019, it was suspended by the trump administration
   in April 2020. The grant directed $599,000 to the Wuhan institute of Virology for bat
   coronavirus research.
   9 British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen, published a
   report in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics (Appendix 7) and claim that the coronavirus’s
   spike protein contains sequences that appear to be artificially inserted. They claim they had
   ‘prima facie evidence of retro-engineering in China’ for a year – but were ignored by academics
   and major journals. Dalgleish is a professor of oncology at St George’s University, London,
   and is best known for his breakthrough creating the first working ‘HIV vaccine’, to treat
   diagnosed patients and allow them to go off medication for months. While analysing COVID19 samples last year in an attempt to create a vaccine, Dalgleish and Sørensen discovered
   ‘unique fingerprints’ in the virus that they say could only have arisen from manipulation in a
   laboratory. They said they tried to publish their findings but were rejected by major scientific
   journals which were at the time resolute that the virus jumped naturally from bats or other
   animals to humans. Even when former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove spoke out publicly
   saying the scientists’ theory should be investigated, the idea was dismissed as ‘fake news.’

4. Toomuchpower says:

   December 12, 2021 - 11:18 pm at 11:18 pm

   Let’s hope that a true patriot Canadian lawyer and US, and Aussie…. cuts and pastes. Foundation has been laid. I would love to get involved in this in any way possible.

   Man, I am coiled for some ass kicking .

5. Fullgoldcrown says:

   December 12, 2021 - 11:37 pm at 11:37 pm

   It’s 50 pages and full of a LOT more …Incredible body of work

   Lets wish them well with the case

6. Banimal says:

   December 13, 2021 - 12:22 am at 12:22 am

   This should be the correct link to download the entire document:
   https://hannahroselaw.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/icc-complaint-7.docx