I just scanned through a recent article by John Hussman about the price one pays for an investment contributing to the level of one’s return. Nothing new or earth shocking there. But it had me jumping to thoughts about Bitcoin. I have written many times about Bitcoin being worthless and a ponzi scheme that will eventually reflect it’s true value. What I never articulated, or really thought about in investment terms(despite being a business major who studied finance and economics) was the classic definition that Hussman reminded me of valuing a security in terms of it’s discounted cash flow being only worth what that flow will realize into the future. I guess I never thought of Bitcoin that way because I don’t consider Bitcoin a security. A bond, or more likely a stock, or even income generating real estate, generates a stream of income and or discounted cash flow for the stock of a company but Bitcoin generates nothing. It is just the greater fool theory of hoping someone will pay more in the future than what you paid for it. Again, nothing that others haven’t said before. It’s just that Bitcoin isn’t really a security, it isn’t even like a bond which is somone or some entity’s promise to pay you back in the future with interest along the way.