“Keep in mind that there’s a theory out there that about 85% of the shots are placebo, which might explain why there are so many uneventful responses yet an extraordinary number of severe or lethal reactions.”
pd – the “85% theory” only started to surface in September and I don’t know if it is scientific or speculative – do you recall where you first heard it from?
O’looney used the term ~Sept21-25 so it must have been discussed publicly prior to then. He referred to it as “advocacy vax strategy” where 15% are culled immediately and 85% survive to sing the praises of the vax until the boosters are deployed……..
Good stuff Pedro. I always felt that all the govt. and lefty politicians were probably not taking the “real jab”, even they aren’t that stupid. Taking blood before and after should be standard procedure but that would prove how poisonous the real jabs are.
one comment to consider
“Keep in mind that there’s a theory out there that about 85% of the shots are placebo, which might explain why there are so many uneventful responses yet an extraordinary number of severe or lethal reactions.”
pd – the “85% theory” only started to surface in September and I don’t know if it is scientific or speculative – do you recall where you first heard it from?
O’looney used the term ~Sept21-25 so it must have been discussed publicly prior to then. He referred to it as “advocacy vax strategy” where 15% are culled immediately and 85% survive to sing the praises of the vax until the boosters are deployed……..
Yeah, only saw it in one of your posts, and remains HIGHLY speculative … aside from the Pfizer acknowledgment.
Good stuff Pedro. I always felt that all the govt. and lefty politicians were probably not taking the “real jab”, even they aren’t that stupid. Taking blood before and after should be standard procedure but that would prove how poisonous the real jabs are.