Slightly off-topic
Got an email from my credit union yesterday. An interesting read and I will quote a portion below:
“As Congress considers new infrastructure spending, lawmakers are considering unconventional sources of revenue to fund their plans. One proposal under consideration would require financial institutions like us to report to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) many activities on accounts with balances over $600.
What this means for you:
- If passed we will be required to report gross inflows and outflows of funds into your account with a breakdown for physical cash, transactions with a foreign account, and transfers to and from another account with the same owner.
- This requirement would apply to all business and personal accounts from financial institutions, including bank, loan, and investment accounts, with the exception of accounts below a low de minimis gross flow threshold of $600 or fair market value of $600.
- For further review of the relevant details from the “General Explanations of the Administration’s Revenue Proposals” (which are included in the U.S. Treasury’s Green Book for FY2022 on pages 94 and 95 of the 114 page PDF file) can be found here: https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/131/General-Explanations-FY2022.pdf
Concerns:
- This proposal would violate the personal privacy of members, like you, by forcing us and other financial institutions to provide the government with information that does not reflect taxable activity.
- The government relies on decades old data systems to store and secure IRS information. These systems have already been compromised in recent years, and the addition of this type of data only increases the likelihood of a future breach of your personal financial information.”
The credit union then goes on to ask us to send a letter to our representatives telling them we do not support this new legislation.
Important information!
We (the whole world) is soooo screwed! The totalitarianism is upon us. How will this ever end?
Good for your C/U. They may not be doing this for altruistic reasons.ie added compliance costs and fear of customers reducing balances to under $600. At least they are being proactive in trying to get their customers to let Congress know they are against it.
Agree. I can only imagine this will cost them more money.