Loading ...If there is profit to be made, they are all over it
Jabbing makes huge profits for Big Pharma. So it only appears that our PHO’s are concerned about our health. We are conditioning a large group of people to accept annual jabs, boosters.
More profits and working toward total control through fear.
Obesity, alcoholism and other lifestyle diseases unfortunately kill more in developed countries but the profits are made in enabling these people to become what they are. Not in curing the problem. It’s not about health, it’s about profits. There is no profit in treating these people once they attain disease status. I shouldn’t say it, but most people don’t want the treatment.
Was at the beach yesterday, no masks seen but most over 50 were seriously obese and still wore bikinis. That’s their choice. The youth seemed fit but this is an active city.
I was surprised as I saw more people on bikes with masks. Young people. What’s with that? It was a hot day in Vancouver.
One can put forward multiple hypotheses for what has caused obesity. These hypotheses are not mutually exclusive. They have varying degrees of supportive evidence. In the case of some hypotheses the evidence is not disputed other than in the details.
Whether the hypotheses include behavioral change, dietary change, composition of change, interaction with the physical environment, in one way or another creation of these changes over the past couple of generations is linked to the same entities that benefit when pharmacology companies benefit. For example, if one hypothesizes (I am no expert and do not know for sure) that certain pesticides tend to lead to obesity, then one sees certain companies that have produced pesticides but also sell products to deal with obesity or diabetes and now purportedly to help with the effects of a virus that particularly ravages those with obesity and diabetes.
I could go on. These points I have largely lifted from others. Ditto for the following, largely plagiarized from one or more people commenting at off-guardian in recent months:
Increasingly regular people have been trained to disdain older people. I was probably trained to disdain my parents more than my parents were trained to disdain their parents. However in the past couple of decades the training has been extreme. Cell phones and the like have been particularly devastating in multiple respects. There has been an ever more extreme push — from above pretending to be from below — for the new, new, new, new. It is almost automatic now. It may be nearly impossible for many younger people not to reject as stupid and against their interests anything from anyone who is older.
Note that it is not necessarily a conservative versus liberal and leftist argument. It is obviously something conservatives freak out about. What many conservatives don’t realize is that genuine leftists and liberals (not many around in many places) have always wanted to preserve the best. Thus in my kids’ public school the teachers performing rear-guard fights against “wokism” and fake leftism I believe were commies and anarchists (though perhaps true liberals if such still exist or Larouchites).
One of the many problems with showbiz and all — and why it is literally propaganda — is that it rewrites history so that kids see history via a Hollywood re-write. Then the movies get re-done to be ‘PC’. History goes down the memory hole.
To the minimal extent I have contact with younger people I try to get them to look at video clips of **anything** from the past and ask them to note how few obese people there were. I try not to suggest too hard that the idea of not being obese is being memory-holed, and that the concept of being memory-holed is being memory-holed.
should have written “‘smart’ phones” not “cellphones”