Question Everything
Here’s an example of why it’s so important to question everything you read. The only way to build up confidence in your forecast is to look at multiple scenarios and gather the evidence on both sides of the argument. Following a post I put on Twitter someone stated that gold was ‘going sub $900’. I genuinely want to consider all sides of the discussion, so asked why he thought that. He gave me a link to a chart someone had posted. Here it is…
I noticed it’s a log scale, and immediately thought it odd. My log chart for gold doesn’t look like that. This is a case of someone drawing a chart with thick lines to fit their bearish narrative. Notice how they’ve scribbled the number ‘2’ right on top of the candle. It hides the fact that their line doesn’t touch the top of the candle. It’s so important to look at your chart on an appropriate level of ‘zoom’ and use a thinner line to get it right. Here’s my version…
The implications are very, very different, I’m sure you’ll agree. If the 8 and 16 year cycle low is behind us (which it is), it makes little sense to make a new low in a years time. Sub $900 gold is fundamentally hard to imagine. Mining shares already lost an average of 80% or more. They would be almost worthless if gold fell another $400 or more, with many mines likely to close. I’m not saying that would be impossible, but it is a very, very low likelihood, with the cyclical lows behind us. The stocharstic indicator on this scale has turned down, but as you can see in early 2009 and early 2010, it means very little in isolation. The chart ‘evidence’ he posted is plain wrong, and it goes to show how people are misled on a regular basis.